Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 108))

  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

During the design of a data system, indirect estimators rarely, if ever, are considered for Federal statistical programs when resources to produce direct estimates of adequate precision are available. However, given an existing system, if direct estimation is judged to be inadequate for a domain not specified in the design, indirect estimation may, in some cases, prove to be a valuable alternative. There are a number of reasons that direct estimators are preferable to indirect ones and, if federal statistical agencies are to improve the usefulness of indirect estimates, a number of important issues, including those that follow, should receive additional attention. The following points are developed further in the sections of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brackstone, G.J. (1987), “Small Area Data: Policy Issues and Technical Challenges,” in Small Area Statistics, New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, H.G., Jackson, D.J., Doenhoefer, S.Johnson W., Tweed, D.L., Stiles, D., Barbano, J.P and Wait,G.(1984),“The Health Demographic Profile System’s Inventory of Small Area Social Indicators,” National Institute of Menta1 Health. Series BN No. 4., Pub. No. (ADM) 84–1354. Washington, D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.H., (1990),“Discussion of paper by Kish,” Survey Methodology, 16–1, 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalton, G. (1987), “Panel Discussion” in Small Area Statistics, New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish, L., (1990), “Rolling Samples and Censuses,” Survey Methodology, 16–1, 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royall, R.A. (1979), Prediction Models in Small Area Estimation“ in Synthetic Estimates for Small Areas (National Institute Abuse, Research Monograph 24), Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuren(1990), “Discussion of paper by Kish,” Survey Methodology, 16–1, 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, W.R. Discussion of a Paper by Levy“ in Synthetic Estimates for Small Areas (National Institute on Drug Abuse, Researc:h Monograph 24 Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govemment pring Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schaible, W.L. (1996). Recommendations and Cautions. In: Schaible, W.L. (eds) Indirect Estimators in U.S. Federal Programs. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 108. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0721-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0721-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94616-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0721-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics