Skip to main content

Calculating the Appropriate Information Matrix for Log-linear Models When Data Are Missing at Random

  • Conference paper
Modelling Longitudinal and Spatially Correlated Data

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 122))

  • 946 Accesses

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that likelihood based inferences are valid when data are missing at random. In his original work on this topic, Rubin defined precisely the extent to which this statement holds. In particular, the observed but not the expected information matrix can be used for frequentist inference. In the rapidly growing literature on this subject, this fact is not always appreciated. An illustration is given, in the setting of the log-linear model for correlated binary data.

G. Molenberghs is Assistant Professor, Biostatistics, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Belgium. M.G. Kenward is a Reader in the Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Kent, UK

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, S.G., Rosenberger, W.F., Dersimonian, R. (1992). Closed-form estimates for missing counts in two-way contingency tables. Statistics in Medicine, 11,643–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cox, D. R. (1972). The analysis of multivariate binary data. Applied Statistics, 21 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kenward, M.G., Molenberghs, G. (1996). Likelihood based frequentist inference when data are missing at random. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laird, N.M. (1988). Missing data in longitudinal studies. Statistics in Medicine, 7, 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Little, R.J.A. (1976). Inference about means for incomplete multivariate data. Biometrika, 63 593–604.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Little, R.J.A., Rubin, D.B. (1987) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubin, D.B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63 581592.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Molenberghs, G., Kenward, M.G. (1997). Calculating the Appropriate Information Matrix for Log-linear Models When Data Are Missing at Random. In: Gregoire, T.G., Brillinger, D.R., Diggle, P.J., Russek-Cohen, E., Warren, W.G., Wolfinger, R.D. (eds) Modelling Longitudinal and Spatially Correlated Data. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 122. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0699-6_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0699-6_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98216-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0699-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics