Axonal Morphometric Correlates of Evoked Potentials in Experimental Spinal Cord Injury
Cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials recorded at a succession of intervals after contusion injury of the cat spinal cord were compared with the numbers of axons surviving in transverse sections of the lesion at 3 months postinjury. In a sample of 25 animals, with injuries varying from ca.87% to 99% loss of myelinated axons in the white matter, there was a significant correlation between chronic axonal survival and the amplitude of the SEP recorded from 30 min to 1 day postinjury. There was little or no correlation between axon numbers and SEPs recorded at 3 months, within this narrow but crucial range of injury intensity. Robust, relatively normal waveforms could be obtained from animals with as few as 2% of the original axon population surviving at the lesion site, and from animals in which all the surviving axons in the dorsal columns were restricted to the outer 100–200 um of tissue. In other cases, repeatable SEPs could not be recorded from animals with >5% survival of axons. SEPs were lost immediately after contusion injury, but partially recovered within the first 4 hours in ca.30% of cases. There was a secondary severe reduction of SEP amplitude within the first day in most examples of early recovery. Most of the final recovery of chronic SEP amplitude occurred within 2–4 weeks.
SEPs from chronic injuries are useful indicators of conduction in spinal cord sensory tracts, though their amplitude cannot be interpreted as a measurement of axonal survival. Acute recovery of the SEP is predictive of chronic functional improvement and indicative of significant axonal survival. Reduction of SEP amplitude is a much more sensitive indicator of acute axonal distress than of chronic axonal loss.
KeywordsAttenuation Hydrochloride Neurol Hunt Stein
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Berenstein, A., Young, W., Ransohoff, J., Benjamin, V. and Merkin, H.: Somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) during spinal angiography and therapeutic transvascular embolization. J. Neurosurg. 60:777–785, 1983.Google Scholar
- 6.Blight, A.R.: Delayed demyelination and macrophage invasion: a candidate for “secondary” cell damage in spinal cord injury. Cen. Nerv. Syst. Trauma 2:299–315, 1985.Google Scholar
- 7.Blight, A.R.: Motor evoked potentials in CNS trauma. Cen. Nerv. Syst. Trauma 3:207–214, 1986.Google Scholar
- 8.Blight, A.R.: Mechanical aspects of experimental spinal cord trauma. J. Amer. Paraplegia Soc, in press, 1988.Google Scholar
- 14.Dorfman, L.J., Perkash, I., Bosley, T.M. and Cummins, K.L.: Use of cerebral evoked potentials to evaluate spinal somatosensory function in patients with traumatic and surgical myelopathies. J. Neurosurg. 52:654–660.Google Scholar
- 20.Schramm, J.: Spinal cord monitoring: Current status and new developments. Cen. Nerv. Syst. Trauma 2:207–227, 1985.Google Scholar
- 25.Young, W.: Correlation of somatosensory-evoked potentials and neurological findings in spinal cord. In: Tator, C.H. (ed) Early Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury. Raven Press, New York, pp. 153–165, 1982.Google Scholar
- 27.Young, W.: Blood flow, metabolic and neurophysiological mechanisms in spinal cord injury. In Becker, D. and Povlishock, J. (Eds) CNS Trauma Status Report. NIH/NINCDS, William Byrd Press, Virginia, pp. 463–473, 1985.Google Scholar