Lifting of Characters

Part of the Progress in Mathematics book series (PM, volume 101)


In Lifting of Characters and Harish-Chandra’s Method of Descent [1] we discussed lifting of characters from endoscopic groups in terms which we need for Arthur's conjectures [4]. This paper is an expository version of [1], written with some important special cases in mind and illustrated by numerous examples. We refer the reader to the introduction to [1] for motivation; here we limit ourselves to a summary of some essential points and a discussion of how this paper differs from [1].


Real Form Discrete Series Borel Subgroup Principal Series Cartan Subgroup 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Adams and D. Vogan, Lifting of Characters and Harish-Chandra’s Method of Descent, submitted to Journal of AMS (preprint).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Adams and D. Vogan, L-Groups, Projective Representations, and the Langlands Classification, to appear in Amer. Journal Math.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Adams and D. Vogan, Lifting of Characters and Harish-Chandra’s Method of Descent, to appear in Amer. Journal Math.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Arthur, On Some Problems Suggested By the Trace Formula, in Proc. of the Special Year in Harmonic Analysis, University of Maryland, R. Herb, Ft. Lipsman and J. Rosenberg, eds., SLN, vol. 1024, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Borel, Automorphic L-Functions, Proc. Symp. Pure Math., vol. 33, American Math. Soc, Providence, Rhode Island, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harish-Chandra, Invariant Eigendistributions on a Semi-simple Lie Group, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 119 (1965), 457–508.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Helgason, in Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Langlands, On the Classification of Irreducible Representations of Real Algebraic Groups, in Representation Theory and Harmonic Analysis on Semisimple Lie Groups, P. Sally, D. Vogan, eds., Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 31, AMS, Providence, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Shelstad, Orbital Integrals and a Family of Groups attached to a Real Reductive Group, Ann. École Nat. Sup. Méc. Nantes 12 (1979), 1–31.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Shelstad, L-Indistinguishability for Real Groups, Math. Ann. 259 (1982), 385–430MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Steinberg, Regular Elements of Semisimple Algebraic Groups, Publ. I.H.E.S. (1965).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Vogan, Representations of Real Reductive Lie Groups, Birkhauser, Boston, 1981.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Vogan, Irreducible Characters of Semisimple Lie Groups IV. Character- Multiplicity Duality, Duke Math. J. 49, No. 4 (1982), 943–1073.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Zuckerman, Tensor Products of Finite and Infinite Dimensional Representations of Semisimple Lie Groups, Ann. of Math. (2) (1977).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations