On Sampled Control with Distributed Processing

  • Adam ŚmiarowskiJr.
  • Joe N. Anderson
Part of the Progress in Systems and Control Theory book series (PSCT, volume 7)


The distributed temporal processing of input and output is the main feature of distributed sampling control (DSC). The DSC method was first used to improve the performance of multi-input multi-output (MIMO) control systems for robots. Control algorithms for which this method can be applied require each system output (or state variable) at a different time point and generate each plant input at a different time point. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the underlying concept and to demonstrate its performance through examples of simple robots operating with model-based controllers. Two controllers are used to drive the same plants. One is based on conventional control principles where feedback signals are simultaneously sampled and plant inputs are applied simultaneously and the other utilizes DSC. Differences in the control action are then analyzed. General aspects of the distributed sampling control are also discussed.


Control Algorithm MIMO System Control Torque Control Command Joint Variable 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, J. N. and A. Śmiarowski, “A Real-Time Computer Architecture for Advanced Robotic Controllers,” in Proc. IASTED International Symposium on Robotics and Automation, May 1988, pp. 85–90.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Śmiarowski, A Real-Time Computer Architecture for Robotic Control, Ph.D. Dissertation, Tennessee Technological University, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paul, R. P., Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming and Control, MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neuman, C. P. and J. J. Murray, “Computational Robot Dynamics: Foundations and Applications,” Journal of Robotic Systems, 2(4), 1985, pp. 425–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luh, J. Y. S., M. W. Walker, and R. P. C. Paul, “On-Line Computational Scheme for Mechanical Manipulators,” Transactions ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Vol. 102, 1980, pp. 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tumeh, Z. S., “A Gain Scheduling Approach in Decentralized Manipulator Control Using Discretized Equivalent Joint Models,” in Proc. of the 27th Conference on Decision and Control, Austin, TX, December 1988, pp. 616–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fu, K. S., R. S. Gonzales, and C. S. G. Lee, Robotics: Control, Sensing, Vision, and Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam ŚmiarowskiJr.
    • 1
  • Joe N. Anderson
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Manufacturing Research and Technology UtilizationTennessee Technological UniversityCookevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations