Abstract
The style used for writing an essay—the format for conveying thoughts—is never as important as the thoughts themselves. Still, at the very outset, I am confronted with a style dilemma: Should I try to analyze the Nazi data issue using a subjective “first person” format—full of “I” and “my”—or should I, instead, revert to the classic “third person” style with its editorial “we” and more somber phraseology? The first lends itself better to emotional descriptions of human tragedy and passionate debate about its consequences. But editors of scientific journals and philosophical treatises seem to prefer the more formal approach, which dampens passion. Third person styles project images of reasoned objectivity and academic authority. They can be used to describe suffering without breaking into tears. They might be able to deal with the Holocaust without going mad.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greene, V.W. (1992). Can Scientists Use Information Derived from the Concentration Camps?. In: Caplan, A.L. (eds) When Medicine Went Mad. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0413-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0413-8_11
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6751-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0413-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive