Abstract
Earlier we reported neonatologists’ reaction (Kopelman et al., 1988) to the controversial federal regulations governing the treatment of severely handicapped infants—the “Baby Doe” Regulations (DHHS, 1985). We found that the responding neonatologists were highly critical of these regulations, and that their concerns were similar to those expressed by the United States Supreme Court (Bowen v. Am. Hosp. Ass’n., 1986) in rejecting an earlier set of Baby Doe regulations (DHHS, 1984). This agreement among the neonatologists and legal authorities on the Supreme Court lead us to conclude that these regulations were ill-considered. Some have questioned, however, whether the neonatologists’ negative reaction to these rules as reported in our survey might be biased, since the regulations restrict their daily practice. Others question if neonatologists have an unrealistic, pessimistic picture of severely sick newborns’ prognoses, since they do not generally deal with older children. To help answer these questions, we now present the reaction of nonneonatologist pediatricians to these regulations. These data were collected at the same time as the reported survey. Their responses are similar to the neonatologists’ responses, undercutting both objections to the conclusions of our survey.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) v. Heckler, 561 F. Supp. 395, 397 (D.D.C.) 1983.
American Medical Association (1980) Principles of medical ethics. Am. Med. News 66, 9.
Avery, G. B., ed. (1987) “Neonatology: Perspective in the Mid-1980’s,” in Neonatology: Pat hophysiology and Management of the Newborn, 3d Ed. (J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia), pp. 9–12.
Bowen vs. American Hospital Association, et al. (1986) US Supreme Court. 106 S.Ct. 2101, No. 84–15–9.
Coulter, D. L. (1987) Neurological uncertainty in newborn intensive care. N. Engl. J. Med. 316, 840–844.
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (1984) Non-discrimination on the Basis of Handicap Relating to Health Care for Handicapped Infants. 49 Fed. Reg. 1622–54 (Referred to as BDR-I).
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (1985) The Child Abuse and Treatment Amendments of 1984 (Public Law 98–457). 50 Fed. Reg. 14878–901 (Referred to as BDR-II).
Freeman, J. M. (1988) “Baby Doe” Regulations. N. Engle. J. Med. 319, 726.
Gianelli, D. M. (1986) Minnesota judge: Baby Lance can die. Am. Med. News 1, 34.
The Hippocratic Oath, Ancient (1982), in Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, 2d Ed. (Beauchamp, T. L. and Walters, L., eds.), Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, p. 121.
Holder, A. R. (1983) Parents, courts and refusal of treatment. J. Pediatrics 103, 515–521.
Kopelman, L. M., Irons, T. G., and Kopelman, A. E. (1988) Neonatologists judge the “Baby Doe” regulations. N. Engl. J. Med. 318, 677–683.
Office of Inspector General (OIG), Office of Analysis and Inspections (1987) Survey of State Baby Doe Programs (Publication no. OA103–87–0018).
Order in the Steinhaus Case (1986) Issues Law Med. 2, 241–251.
Smith, D. W. (1982) Recognizable patterns of human malformations: Genetic, embryologic and clinical aspects, in Major Problems in Clinical Pediatrics, 3rd Ed., vol. 7. (W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia).
University Hospital, State of New York at Stoney Brook (SUNY), US Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit, No. 679, Docket 83–6343 (1984).
US Child Abuse Protection and Treatment Amendments of 1984, Public Law 98–457. Amendments to Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act and Child Abuse Prevention and Adoption Reform Act. Amendment No. 3385. Congressional Record 1984; Senate S8951–S8956.
US Rehabilitation Act. Public Law 93–112.29 USC. 794.
Zar, J. H. (1984) “Testing for Goodness of Fit,” in Biostatistical Analysis, 2d Ed. (Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ), p. 45.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kopelman, L.M., Kopelman, A.E., Irons, T.G. (1992). Neonatologists, Pediatricians, and the Supreme Court Criticize the “Baby Doe” Regulations. In: Caplan, A.L., Blank, R.H., Merrick, J.C. (eds) Compelled Compassion. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0409-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0409-1_9
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6749-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0409-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive