Skip to main content

Numerical Simulation of Entry Flow over Blunt Swept-Wing Planes

  • Chapter
  • 198 Accesses

Abstract

Viscous, heat-conducting flow with chemical and vibrational relaxation processes of the constituent gases surrounding winged spacecraft is considered in the continuum regime. The Navier-Stokes equations are appended by additional vibrational energy and species rate equations and supplemented by the equations of state and the phenomenological laws based on mixture rules or collisional cross sections. Numerical convective flux can be obtained from several forms of one-dimensional Riemann solver , with or without entropy correction. High-order accuracy is obtained from two types of reconstructive interpolation. A number of explicit and implicit numerical schemes have been implemented as a means to yield converged solutions. Both shock-fitting, finite-difference and shock-capturing, finitevolume techniques have been tested for configurations such as a sphere, double ellipsoid, blunt-edge delta wing, a European Hermes vehicle, and the U .S. Shuttle orbiter. The shock-fitting code provides excellent results only for simple configurations, whereas the shock-capturing code leads to overall satisfying solutions for complex geometries. The ADI or LU factorization technique using a local time increment up to the Courant number equal to 4 has facilitated inviscid, reacting flow simulations on a Convex 2 or Cray XMP. Yet viscous and thermochemical nonequilibrium flow computations require prohibitively large memory sizes and unavailable computer speeds; hence only a few cases of practical interest are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wada, Y. and Kubota, H., “Numerical Simulation of Re-Entry Flow around the Space Shuttle with Finite-Rate Chemistry,” submitted to AIAA J., March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yamamoto, Y., “Numerical Simulation of Hypersonic Viscous Flow for the Design of H-II Orbiting Plane(HOPE), Part II” Paper 91–1390, AIAA 26th Thermophysics Conference, Honolulu, HA, June, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eberle, A., Schmetz, M. and Bissinger, N., “Generalized Fluxvectors for Hypersonic Shock Capturing,” Paper 90-0390, AIAA 28th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Jan. 8-11, 1990, Reno, NV.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li, C. P., “Computational Methods for Shock Waves in ThreeDimensionalSupersonic Flow,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 87, pp. 305–327, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Da Costa, J. L., “Hypersonic Inviscid Flow Field Simulations Around Reentry Vehicles with Flap Deflection,” Proceedings of the First European Symposium, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, May 1991, pp. 407–412.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ma, E., Wey, T., and Li, C. P., “Flowfield Computations and Comparison with Shuttle Aerodynamic Data” Paper 91-1744, AIAA 22nd Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics Lasers Conference, Honolulu, HA, June 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamilton, H. H., Greene, F. A. and Weilmuenster, K. J., “Comparison of Heating Rate Calculations with Experimental Data on a Modified Shuttle Orbiter at Mach 6,” Paper 91-1347, AIAA 26th Thermophysics Conference, Honolulu, HA, June 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Desideri, J-A, Mallet, M., Periaux, J. and Stouffiet, B., “Adapted Finite Element Simulation of 3D Hypersonic Reacting Flows around Hermes,” in HYPERSONICS II, 3&4, ed. J. J. Bertin, J. Periaux, J. Ballmann, Birkhuser Boston, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pfitzner, M., “A 3-D Non-Equilibrium Shock-Fitting Algorithm Using Effective Rankine-Hugoniot Relations,” Paper 91-1467, AIAA 22nd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmas Dynamics Lasers Conference, Honolulu, HA, June 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, C. P., “Computational Aspects of Chemically Reacting Flows,” AIAA 10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Paper 91-1574, Honolulu, HA, June, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rieger, H., Stock, H. and Wagner, B., “Computational Aerothermodynamic Method for Industrial Applications to Re-Entry and Hypersonic Cruise Problems,” Proceedings of the First European Symposium, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, May 1991, pp. 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vos, J. B. and Bergman, C. M., “A Multiblock Flow Solver for Inviscid Hypersonic Flows,” Proceedings of the First European Symposium, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, May 1991, pp. 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Park, C., Nonequilibrium Hyperronic Aerothermodynamicr, John Wiley Sons, Inc., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tarn, L. T. and Li, C. P., “Three-Dimensional Thermochemical Nonequilibrium Flow Modeling for Hypersonic Flows,” Paper 89-1860, AIAA 20th Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, Buffalo, NY, June 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tannehill, J. V. and Mugge, P. H., “Improved Curve Fits for the Thermodynamic Properties of Equilibrium Air Suitable for Numerical Computation using Time-Dependent or Shock-Capturing Methods,” Report ISU-ER1-Ames-74050, Feb. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vincenti, W. G. and Kruger, C. H., Introduction to Phyrical Gar Dynamics, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McBride, B. J. and Gordon, S., “Fortran IV Program for Calculation of Thermodynamic Data,” TND-4097, NASA, August 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Srinivasan, S. and Tannehill, J. V., “Simplified Curve Fits for the Transport Properties of Equilibrium Air,” CR 178411, NASA, Dec. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li, C. P., “Computation of Hypersonic Flow Fields,” in HYPERSONICS II, ed. J. J. Bertin, R. Glowinski, J. Periaux, Birkhuser Boston, 1989, pp. 289–411.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hirsch, C., Numerical Computation tor External and Internal Flowr, John Wiley Sons, Inc., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pan, D. and Chakravarthy, S., “Unified Formulation for Incompressible Flows,” Paper 89-0122, 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Jan. 1989, Reno, NV.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, C. P., “A Finite Difference Method for Solving Transient Viscous Flow Problems,” AIAA J. Vol. 23, 1985, pp. 659–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lax, P. D., “Weak Solutions of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations and their Numerical Computation,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 7, pp.159–193

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roe, P. L., “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes,” J. Comp. Phys. 43, 1981, pp.357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Walters, R. W., Cinnella, P. and Slack, D. C., “Characteristic-Based Algorithms for Flows in Thermo-Chemical N onequilibrium,” Paper 90-0393, 28th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Jan. 1990, Reno, NV.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Molvik, G. A. and Merkle, C. L., “A Set of Strongly Coupled, Upwind Algorithms for Computing Flows in Chemical Nonequilibrium,” Paper 89-0199, AIAA 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Jan. 9-12, 1989, Reno, NV.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Van Leer, B., “Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme, Part IV,” J. Comp. Phys. 23, 1977, pp. 276–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Alabada, G. D. and Van Leer, B. and Roberts, W., “A Comparative Study of Computational Methods in Cosmic Gas Dynamics,” Astron. Astrophysicl, 108, 1982, pp.76–84.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yee, H. C., “A Class of High-Resolution Explicit and Implicit ShockCapturing Methods,” TM 101088, NASA, Feb. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sanders, R. and Li., C., “A Variation Nonexpansive Central Differencing Scheme for Nonlinear Hyperbolic Conservation Laws,” Proc. Tenth Inter. Conf. Computing Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Versailles, France, Feb. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Palmer, G., “The Development of an Explicit Thermochemical Nonequilibrium Algorithm to Compute Three Dimensional AFE Flow Fields,” Paper 89-1701, AIAA 25th Thermophysics Conference, June, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gnoffo, P. A., “Upwind-Biased, Point-Implicit Relaxation Strategies for Viscous, Hypersonic Flows,” Paper 89-1972-CP, AIAA 9th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, June, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jameson, A., “Numerical Solution of the Euler Equatian far Compressible Inviscid Fluids,” in Numerical Methods lor the Euler Equations of Fluid Dynamics, ed. F. Angrand, et al. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1985, pp.199–231.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Beam, R. M. and Warming, R. F., “An Implicit Faetored Scheme for the Compressible N avier-Stokes Equations,” AIAA J. 16, 1978, pp. 393–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yee, H., “Linearized Form ofImplicit TVD Schemes for Multidimensional Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations,” Computers Y Mathmatics with Applications, 12A, pp. 413–432, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shuen, S. and Yoon, S., “Numerieal Study of Chemieally Reacting Flows Using a Lower-Upper Symmetrie Suceessive Overrelaxation Scheme,” AIAA J. 27, No. 12, Dec 1989, pp. 1752–1760.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Grantham, W. L., “Flight Results of a 25,000 foot per Second Reentry Experiment Using Microwave Reflectometers to Measure Plasma Electron Density and Standoff Distance,” NASA TN D-6617, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lobb, R. P., “Experimental Measurement ofShock Detachment Distance on Sphere Fired in Air at Hypervelocities,” Chap. 26 in The High Temperature Aspect. of Hypersonic Flow, ed. W. C. Nelson, The Macmillan Co., New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Marrone, P. V., “Inviseid Nonequilibrium Flow Behind Bow and Normal Shock Waves. Part I. General Analysis and Numerical Examples,” CAL Report No. QM-1626-A-12(I). Cornell Aeronautical Lab., Inc, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stupoehenko, Y. V., Losev, S. A. and Osipov, A. I., Relaxation in Shock Walle., R. S. L. Lee, Ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1967.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. “Workshop on Hypersonic Flows for Reentry Problems, Part II,” Antibes, France, April 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Manna, M., Deconick, H., Ma, E. and Li., C. P., “Validation of High Resolution Upwind Solvers on 3D Inviscid Hypersonic Flow Around Delta Wings,” Symposium on Theoretical and Experimental Methods in Hypersonic Flows, AGARD 70th Fluid Dynamics Panel Meeting, Torino, Italy, May, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wey, T. and Li, C. P., “Numerical Simulation of Shuttle Ascent Transonic Flow Using an Unstructured Approach,” Computer. & Structures 39, no.1 and 2, 1991, pp.207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Li, C.P. (1992). Numerical Simulation of Entry Flow over Blunt Swept-Wing Planes. In: Bertin, J.J., Periaux, J., Ballmann, J. (eds) Advances in Hypersonics. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0375-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0375-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6732-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0375-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics