Advertisement

Preparation- or Intention-To-Act, in Relation to Pre-Event Potentials Recorded at the Vertex

  • Benjamin Libet
  • Elwood W. WrightJr.
  • Curtis A. Gleason
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Neuroscientists book series (CN)

Abstract

A slow negative shift in potential, recordable extracranially, appears during the second or so preceding a signal to which a subject is supposed to respond. The ’ contingent negative variation’ (CNV) was the first discovered example of this (Walter et al. 1964). Similar pre-event potentials were found in a variety of delayed reaction paradigms, in both man (Low et al. 1966a; Donchin et al. 1971, 1972; Kutas and Donchin 1980; Rohrbaugh et al. 1980; Sanquist et al. 1981; Libet et al. 1982) and monkeys (Low et al. 1966b; Rebert 1972; Rosen and Stamm 1972). Several classes of processes may be reflected in these pre-event potentials: (1) a non-motor process; suggestions for this have included expectancy or anticipation (Walter et al., 1964), or an orienting or possibly more ‘general response to salient or novel stimuli’ (see Rohrbaugh and Gaillard, 1983) which may involve a shift in attentive or arousal state (Desmedt 1981) and leads to some behavioral/mental response (Donchin et al. 1971, 1972); (2) a general cerebral motor process, as represented in the readinesspotential (RP), that leads to the response (e.g., Rohrbaugh et al. 1980; Sanquist et al. 1981); (3) a combination of (1) and (2) (see Kutas and Donchin 1980; Rohrbaugh and Gaillard 1983); (4) a conative process of preparing or intending to act, independent of any actual movement (e.g., Low et al. 1966a; Libet et al. 1982). The present work helps to distinguish more definitively among these alternatives for the case of vertex-recorded potentials. The same human subject was tested with closely related procedures all of which developed mental sets of strong expectancy, orientation and attentiveness but differed in whether motor or non-motor responses were required. The study utilizes the subjects’ introspective reports, in conjunction with the behavioral tasks, to define the mental sets in question.

Keywords

Supplementary Motor Area Contingent Negative Variation Readiness Potential Introspective Report Vertex Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Deecke, L. and Kornhuber, H.H. An electrical sign of participation of the mesial “ supplementary” motor cortex in human voluntary finger movement. Brain Res., 1978, 159: 473–476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deecke, L., Grö zinger, B. and Kornhuber, H.H. Voluntary finger movement in man: cerebral potentials and theory. Biol. Cybernet, 1976, 23: 99–119.Google Scholar
  3. Desmedt, J.E. Scalp-recorded cerebral event-related potentials in man as point of entry into the analysis of cognitive processing. In: F.O. Schmitt, F.G. Worden, G. Adelman and S.D. Dennis (Eds.), The Organization of the Cerebral Cortex. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1981: 441–473.Google Scholar
  4. Desmedt, J.E. and Debecker, J. Slow potential shifts and decision P350 interactions in tasks with random sequences of near threshold clicks and finger stimuli delivered at regular intervals. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1979, 47: 671–679.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donchin, E., Otto, D., Gerbrandt, L.K. and Pribram, K.H. While a monkey waits; electrocortical events recorded during the foreperiod of a reaction time study. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1971, 31: 115–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donchin, E., Gerbrandt, L.K., Leifer, L. and Tucker, L. Is the contingent negative variation contingent on a motor response? Psychophysiology, 1972, 9: 178–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eccles, J.C. The initiation of voluntary movements by the supplementary motor area. Arch. Psychiat. Nervenkr., 1982, 231: 423–441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kornhuber, H.H. and Deecke, L. Hirnpotentialanderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol., 1965, 284: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kutas, M. and Donchin, E. Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Res., 1980, 202: 95–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lassen, N.A., Ingvar, D.H. and Skonhoj, E. Brain function and blood flow. Scient. Amer., 1978, 239: 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Libet, B., Wright, Jr., E.W. and Gleason, C.A. Readiness potentials preceding unrestricted “ spontaneous” vs. preplanned voluntary acts. Electroenceph. din. Neurophysiol., 1982, 54: 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Libet, B., Gleason, C.A., Wright, E.W. and Pearl, D.K. Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activities (readiness-potential); the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 1983, 106: 623–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Low, M.D., Borda, R.P. and Kellaway, P. “Contingent negative variation” in rhesus monkeys: an EEG sign of a specific mental process. Percept. Motor Skills, 1966a, 22: 443–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Low, M.D., Borda, R.P., Frost, Jr. J.D. and Kellaway, P. Surface-negative, slow-potential shift associated with conditioning in man. Neurology (Minneap.), 1966b, 16: 771–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rebert, C.S. Cortical and subcortical slow potentials in the monkey’s brain during a preparatory interval. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1972, 33: 389–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rohrbaugh, J.W. and Gaillard, A.W.K. Sensory and motor aspects of the contingent negative variation. In: A.W.K. Gaillard and W. Ritter (Eds.), Tutorials in ERP Research: Endogenous Components. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1983: 269–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rohrbaugh, J.W., Syndulko, K., Sanquist, T.F. and Lindsley, D.B. Synthesis of the contingent negative variation brain potential from noncontingent stimulus and motor elements. Science, 1980, 208: 1165–1168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosen, S.C. and Stamm, J.S. Cortical steady potential shifts during delayed response performance by monkeys. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1972, 33: 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sanquist, T.F., Beatty, J.T. and Lindsley, D.B. Slow potential shifts of human brain during forewarned reaction. Electroenceph. din. Neurophysiol., 1981, 51: 639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vaughan, Jr., H.G., Costa, L.D. and Ritter, W. Topography of the human motor potential. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1968, 25: 1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Walter, W.G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V.J., McCallum, W.C. and Winter, A.L. Contingent negative variation: an electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature (Lond.), 1964, 203: 380–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Libet
    • 1
  • Elwood W. WrightJr.
    • 2
  • Curtis A. Gleason
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Neurological Institute, Department of NeuroscienceMount Zion Hospital and Medical CenterSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations