Skip to main content

Legal Issues in Biotechnology

  • Chapter
The Biotech Business Handbook

Abstract

Research costs are very high in the biotechnology industry. A single one day experiment can cost several thousand dollars worth of labor, laboratory reagents and expendable goods, equipment use, and over head. Logically, the data derived from such research need to be concealed from corn—petitors in order to maintain the forefront status in this fast paced field. In addition, once new products are manufactured and sold, those that are substantial revenue producers for the company must be protected from slightly different, metoo products developed by competing biotechnology and healthcare firms. As we will see in this chapter, there are numerous legal methods that can be used to protect biotechnology inventions, drug formulations, instruments, scientific literature, product brand names, etc. These include patents, trademarks, and copyrights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Pertinent Reading

Articles

  • Amicus Curiaebrief, American Patent Law Association (US. Supreme Court filing October, 1979, No. 79–136) in the case of:Sidney A. Diamond

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. 1993. Researchers win decision on knockout mouse pricing (Intellectual Property).Science260:23–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. 1993. A new model for gene patents?Science260:23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1993. Genetics Institute and Amgen settle prolonged EPO dispute.GEN 13(11): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bent, S. 1992. Misplaced concerns surround Venter/ NIH application covering human genes.GEN124

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, D.A. 1983. Lifeforms, computer programs and the pursuit of a patent.Technol. Rev.pp. 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitwisch, R. 1992. Patenting DNA (Letter to the Editor).Science254:1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey, G.D. and E. Kahn. 1991. How to negotiate reasonable royalty rates for licensing novel biomedical products.GEN 11:4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danheiser, S.L. 1993. PEC wins patent on protein evolution technology.GEN13(14):1.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Palma, A. 1993. Enzo Biochem sues Calgene in dispute over patent.GEN13:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, G.J. 1988. PTO sets up new group for biotech patent applications.GEN8:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J.L. NIH nixes human DNA patents. What next?Bio/Technology12(4):348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granados, P. and S. Bent. 1991. Senate subcommittee considers biotech patent protection act.GEN11: 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.S. 1992. NIH files second patent on expressed sequence tags.GEN12:17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.J. 1991. Patenting DNA (Letter to the Editor).Science254:1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebovitz, R. 1991. Patenting DNA (Letter to the Editor).Science254:1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, T. 1983. Genetic Engineering: To patent everything in sight?Technol. Rev. February/ Marchpp. 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Coy, H.D., Jr. 1993. Research on fetal tissue likely to trigger more legal complications.GEN13:3.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGough, K.J. and D.P. Burke. 1993. Legislation closes gap in patent protection.Bio/Technology11:778–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. 1984. What is a patentable biotechnological invention? in:The Proceedings of Biotech. ‘84 Europe.Pinner, Online Publications Ltd., pp. 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slutsker, G. 1991. Patenting mother nature.ForbesScience Technology Section, January 7, p. 290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimpel, H. 1992. Experts say patent squabbles affect NIH-industry relations.GEN12(19):1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, J.B. 1984. Licensing of biotechnology products. in:The Proceedings of Biotech. ‘84 Europe.Pinner, Online Publications Ltd., pp. 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K.M. 1994. How to avoid patent infringement.Bio/Technology12:297–298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Books

  • The Concise Guide to PatentsTrademarks and Copyrights.(Ed., S.J. Schepps) Bell Publishing Company, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copyright Handbook.(2nd ed.) by D.F. Johnson. R.R. Bowker, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • How to Register a Copyright and Protect Your Creative Workby R.B. Chickering and S. Hartman. Scribner, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inventor’s Handbook.by T.W. Fenner and J.L. Everett. Chemical Publishing Co., New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Inventor’s Notebook.by G. Grissom and D. Pressman. Nolo Press, Berkeley, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patent Law in BiotechnologyChemicals Pharmaceuticals.by H.C. Wegner. Stockton Press, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patenting in the Biological Sciences.by R.S. Crespi. Wiley, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • PharmaceuticalsBiotechnology The Law.by T. Cook, C. Doyle, and D. Jabbari. Stockton Press, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protecting Biotechnology Inventions.by R. Saliwanchik. Science Tech Publishers, Madison, WI, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protecting Scientific Ideas and Inventions.by R.D. Foltz and T.A. Penn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Understanding Chemical Patents: A Guide for the InventorSecond Edition.by J.T. Maynard and H.M. Peters. ACS Publications, Washington, DC, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Writer’s LawyerEssential Legal Advice for Writers and Editors in All Media.by R.L. Goldfarb and G.E. Ross. Times Books, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Writing the Laboratory Notebook.by H.M. Kanare. ACS Publications, Washington, DC, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pappas, M.G. (1994). Legal Issues in Biotechnology. In: The Biotech Business Handbook. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0293-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0293-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7139-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0293-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics