Enveloping Algebras: Problems Old and New

  • Anthony Joseph
Part of the Progress in Mathematics book series (PM, volume 123)

Abstract

I recently came across a list of twenty problems on enveloping algebras that I had presented during a meeting on Enveloping Algebras in Oberwolfach during August 1982. This was a time when the study of primitive ideals had reached a particularly interesting stage and before quantum groups had been invented. Of these roughly half were settled and need not be mentioned further. On the remaining problems relatively little progress has been made despite the availability of new geometric information particularly on orbital varieties and of our experience with quantum groups. In the following sections some of these and some new questions are reviewed. Throughout g denotes a semisimple Lie algebra and U(g) its enveloping algebra.

Keywords

Filtration Manifold Lution Reso Nite 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [A]
    J. Adams and coeditors, Representation Theory of Groups and Algebras, Comtemp. Math. 145 AMS, Providence 1993.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [AD]
    J. Alev and F. Dumas, Sur le corps des fractions de certaines algèbres quantiques, J. Algebra. (In the Press).Google Scholar
  3. [AK]
    L. Auslander and B. Kostant, Polarization and unitary representations of solvable Lie groups, Inv. Math. 14 (1971), 255–354.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [Ba]
    D. Barbasch, Representations with Maximal Primitive Ideal, pp.317–331 in Progress in Math. 92 Birkhauser, Boston 1990.Google Scholar
  5. [BB]
    A. Beilinson and J. Bernstein, Localization deg modules, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris (A) 292 (1981), 15–18.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [BV]
    D. Barbasch and D.A. Vogan, Unipotent representations of complex simple Lie groups, Ann. Math. 121 (1985), 41–110.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [Bl]
    E. Benlolo, Étude des variétés orbitales dans U(sl(n, ℂ)), C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris (A), 315 (1992), 537–540.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [B2]
    E. Benlolo, Sur la quantification de certaines variétés orbitales, Bull. Sci. Math. 3 (1994), 225–241.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [BG]
    I.N. Bernstein and S.I. Gelfand, Tensor products of finite and infinite dimensional representatives of semisimple Lie algebras, Compositio Math. 41 (1980), 245–285.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [Bro]
    B. Broer, Line Bundles on the Cotangent Bundle of the Flag Variety, Invent. Math. 113 (1993), 1–20.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [Br]
    R.K. Brylinski, Limits of weight spaces, Lusztig’s q-analogs, and fiberings of adjoint orbits, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 (1989), 517–533.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [BK]
    J.-L. Brylinski and M. Kashiwara, Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture and holonomic systems, Invent. Math. 64 (1981), 387–410.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [BV]
    D. Barbasch and D.A. Vogan, Unipotent representatives of complex semisimple Lie groups, Ann. Math. 121 (1985), 41–110.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [Ca]
    P, Caldero, Sur le centre de U q(n+), Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie 35 (1994), 13–23.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [CC]
    L.G. Casian and D.H. Collingwood, The Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture for generalized Verma modules, Math. Z. 195 (1987), 581–600.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [C]
    N. Conze, Algèbres d’opérateurs différentiels et quotients des algèbres enveloppantes, Bull. Soc. Math. France 102 (1974), 379–415.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [CD]
    N. Conze-Berline and M. Duflo, Sur les représentations induites des groupes semisimples complexes, Compositio Math. 34 (1977), 307–336.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [D]
    J. Dixmier, Enveloping Algebras, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.Google Scholar
  19. [DK]
    C. De Concini and V.G. Kac, Representations of quantum groups at roots of 1, pp.471–506 in Progress in Math. 92 Birkhauser, Boston 1990.Google Scholar
  20. [DKP]
    C.De Concini, V.G. Kac and C. Procesi, Quantum coadjoint action, JAMS, 5 (1992), 151–189.MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [Dr]
    V.G. Drinfeld, On almost cocommutative Hopf algebras, Leningrad Math. J. 1 (1990), 321–342.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. [Du]
    M. Duflo, Sur la classification des idéaux primitifs dans l’algèbre enveloppante d’une algèbre de Lie semisimple, Ann. Math. 105 (1977), 107–120.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [G]
    A.B. Goncharov, Constructions of the Weil representations of certain simple Lie algebras, Punct. Anal. Appl. 16 (1982), 70–71.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. [GJ]
    O. Gabber and A. Joseph, On the Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand resolution and the Duflo sum formula, Compositio Math. 43 (1981), 107–131.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [H]
    W.H. Hesselink, Characters of the Nullcone, Math. Ann. 252 (1980), 179–182.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [HJ]
    M. Harris and H.P. Jakobsen, Singular Holomorphic Representations and Singular Modular Forms, Math. Ann. 259 (1982), 227–244.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [Ho]
    R. Hotta, On Joseph’s construction of Weyl group representations, Tohoku Math. J. 36 (1984), 49–74.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [I]
    R.S. Irving, The Socle Filtration of a Verma Module, Ann. Ec. Norm. Sup. 21 (1988), 47–65.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [Ja]
    J.-C. Jantzen, Moduln mit einem höchsten Gewicht, LN 750, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1979.MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [J1]
    A. Joseph, A generalization of the Gelfand-Kirillov conjecture, Amer. J. Math. 99 (1977), 1151–1165.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [J2]
    A. Joseph, Dixmier’s problem for Verma and principal series submodules, J. London Math. Soc. 20 (1979), 193–204.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [J3]
    A. Joseph, Goldie rank in the enveloping algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra III, J. Algebra 73 (1981), 295–326.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [J4]
    A. Joseph, Completion functors in the O category, LN 1020, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1983, 80–106.Google Scholar
  34. [J5]
    A. Joseph, On the variety of a highest weight module, J. Algebra 88 (1984), 238–278.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [J6]
    A. Joseph, A surjectivity theorem for rigid highest weight modules, Invent. Math. 92 (1988), 567–596.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [J7]
    A. Joseph, Multiplicity of the adjoint representations in simple quotients of the enveloping algebra of a simple Lie algebra, TAMS 316 (1989), 447–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [J8]
    A. Joseph, On the characteristic polynomials for orbital varieties, Ann. Ec. Norm. Sup. 22 (1989), 569–603.MATHGoogle Scholar
  38. [J9]
    A. Joseph, A sum rule and multiplicities for primitive quotients, preprint 1991, unpublished.Google Scholar
  39. [J10]
    A. Joseph, Annihilators and associated varieties of unitary highest weight modules, Ann. Ec. Norm. Sup. 25 (1992), 1–45.Google Scholar
  40. [J11]
    A. Joseph, Quantum Groups and their Primitive Ideals, Springer-Verlag. (In the Press).Google Scholar
  41. [J12]
    A. Joseph, Characters for Unipotent Representations, J. Algebra 130 (1990), 273–295.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [JL1]
    A. Joseph and G. Letzter, Local finiteness for the adjoint action for quantized enveloping algebras, J. Algebra 153 (1992), 289–318.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [JL2]
    A. Joseph and G. Letzter, Separation of variables for quantized enveloping algebras, Amer. J. Math., 116 (1994), 127–177.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [JL3]
    A. Joseph and G. Letzter, Verma module annihilators and quantized enveloping algebras, Ann. Ec. Norm. Sup. (In the Press).Google Scholar
  45. [JL4]
    A. Joseph and G. Letzter, Rosso’s form and quantized enveloping algebras, Preprint 1993.Google Scholar
  46. [Ki]
    A.A. Kirillov, Unitary representations of nilpotent Lie groups, Uspehi Mat. Nauk 17 (1962), 57–110.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  47. [K1]
    B. Kostant, Lie group representations on polynomial rings, Amer. J. Math. 85 (1963), 327–404.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [K2]
    B. Kostant, On the existence and irreducibility of certain series of representations, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 75 (1969), 627–642.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [K3]
    B. Kostant, Quantization and Unitary Representations, pp.87–208 in Lecture Notes in Mathematics 170, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1970.Google Scholar
  50. [K4]
    B. Kostant, Verma modules and the existence of quasi-invariant differential operators, pp. 101–128 in Non-commutative Harmonic Analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 466, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1975.Google Scholar
  51. [LS]
    T. Levasseur and J.T. Stafford, Rings of Differential Operators on Classical Rings of Invariants, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 412 (1989).Google Scholar
  52. [LSS]
    T. Levasseur, S.P. Smith and J.T. Stafford, The minimal nilpotent orbit, the Joseph ideal, and differential operators, J. Algebra, 116 (1988), 480–501.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [L1]
    G. Lusztig, Characters of reductive groups over a finite field, Ann. of Math. Studies, 107, Princeton, 1984.Google Scholar
  54. [L2]
    G. Lusztig, Introduction to Quantum Groups, Progress in Mathematics 110, Birkhauser, Boston 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
  55. [M1]
    A. Melnikov, RobinsonSchensted procedure and combinatorial properties of geometric order sl(n), C.R. Acad. Sci. 315 (1992), 709–714.MATHGoogle Scholar
  56. [M2]
    A. Melnikov, Irreducibility of the associated variety of simple highest weight modules in sl(n), C.R. Acad. Sci. 316 (1993), 53–57.MATHGoogle Scholar
  57. [M3]
    A. Melnikov, Orbital varieties and Order Relations on Young Tableaux, Preprint 1994.Google Scholar
  58. [PRV]
    K.R. Parthasarathy, R. Ranga Rao and V.S. Varadarajan, Representations of complex semisimple Lie groups and Lie algebras, Ann. Math. 85 (1967), 383–429.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. [R]
    W. Rossmann, Nilpotent Orbital Integrals in a Real Semisimple Lie algebra and Representations of Weyl Groups, pp. 263–287 in Progress in Mathematics 92, Birkhauser, Boston, 1990.Google Scholar
  60. [Ro]
    M. Rosso, Analogues de la forme de Killing et du theorem d’Harish-Chandra pour les groupes quantiques, Ann. Ec. Norm. Sup. 23 (1990), 445–467.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. [S]
    N.N. Shapovalev, On a bilinear form on the universal enveloping algebra of a complex semisimple Lie algebra, Funct. Anal. Appl., 6 (1972), 307–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [So]
    J.-M. Souriau, Quantification Geometrique, Commun. Math. Phys. 1 (1966), 374–378.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. [V]
    D.A. Vogan, Unitary Representations of Reductive Lie Groups, Ann. of Math. Studies 118, Princeton 1987.Google Scholar
  64. [T]
    T. Tanisaki, Characteristic varieties of highest weight modules and primitive quotients, Adv. Studies in Pure Math. 14 (1988), 1–30.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  65. [Z]
    A. Zahid, Orbite Nilpotent Minimale en type G 2, et Operateurs Différentiels, Thèse, Partie 2, Paris 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Joseph
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Theoretical MathematicsThe Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Mathématiques FondamentalesUniversité de Pierre et Marie CurieParis 75252 Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations