New Results on Nonlinear H-Control via Measurement Feedback

  • Alberto Isidori
Conference paper
Part of the Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games book series (AISDG, volume 1)

Abstract

In the last few years, the solution of the H (sub)optimal control problem via state-space methods was developed by several authors (see, e.g. the prize-winning paper [1], the theses [2] [3] and the recent paper [4]). In the state-space formulation, the problem of minimizing the H norm (or, equivalently, the L 2gain) of a closed loop system is viewed as a two-person, zero sum, differential game and, thus, the existence of the desired controller can be related to the existence of a solution of the algebraic Riccati equations arising in linear quadratic differential game theory (see, e.g. [5], [6] and [7]).

Keywords

Attenuation Rium Decis Doyle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J.C. Doyle, K. Glover, P.P. Khargonekar, and B.A. Francis, State space solutions to standard H2 and H control problems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC-34:831–846, 1989.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A.A. Stoorvogel, The H∞ control problem: a state space approach, PhD thesis, Technical University Eindhoven, 1990.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. Scherer, The Riccati inequality and state-space H∞-optimal control, PhD thesis, University of Würzburg, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    LR. Petersen, B.D.O. Anderson and E.A. Jonckheere, A first principles solution to the nonsingular H control problem, Int. J. of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 1:153–170, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    E.F. Mageirou and Y.C. Ho, Decentralized stabilization via game theoretic methods, Automatica, 13:888–896, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Tadmor, Worst case design in time domain, Math. Control, Signals and Systems, 3:301–324, 1990.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. Basar and P. Bernhard, H∞-optimal control and related Minimax problems, Birkhauser, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.A. Ball and J.W. Helton, H∞ optimal control for nonlinear plants: connection with differential games, In Proc. of 28th Conf. Decision and Control, pages 956–962, Tampa, FL, December 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A.J. Van der Schaft, A state-space approach to nonlinear H∞ control, Syst. and Contr. Lett., 16:1–8, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Isidori, Feedback control of nonlinear systems, In Proc. of 1st European Control Conf., pages 1001–1012, Grenoble, France, July 1991.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    A.J. Van der Schaft, L2-gain analysis of nonlinear systems and nonlinear H∞ control, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC-37:770–784, 1992.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Isidori and A. Astolfi, Nonlinear H∞ control via measurement feedback, J. Math. Systems, Estimation and Control, 2:31–44, 1992.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Isidori and A. Astolfi, Disturbance attenuation and H∞ control via measurement feedback in nonlinear systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC-37:1283–1293, 1992.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. Ball, J.W. Helton, and M.L. Walker, A variational approach to nonlinear H∞ control, Tech. memorandum, University of California at San Diego, August 1991.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Isidori, Dissipation inequalities in nonlinear H∞ control, Proc. 31th Conf. Decis. Contr., pages 3265–3270, Tucson, AZ, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Isidori
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Departement of Computer and Systems ScienceUniversità di Roma “La Sapienza”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Systems Sciences and MathematicsWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations