Analysis of One and Two Particle Quantum Systems using Geometric Algebra

  • Rachel Parker
  • Chris J. L. Doran

Abstract

When two or more subsystems of a quantum system interact with each other they can become entangled. In this case the individual subsystems can no longer be described as pure quantum states. For systems with only two subsystems this entanglement can be described using the Schmidt decomposition. This selects a preferred orthonormal basis for expressing the wavefunction and gives a measure of the degree of entanglement present in the system. The extension of this to the more general case of n subsystems is not yet known. We present a review of this process using the standard representation and apply this method in the geometric algebra setting, which has the advantage of suggesting a generalisation to n subsystems.

Keywords

Timothy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S.J. Lomonaco, An entangled tale of quantum entanglement, quantph/0101120.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    C.J.L. Doran, A.N. Lasenby, and S.F. Gull, States and operators in the spacetime algebra, Found. Phys. 23(9) (1993), 1239.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    C.J.L Doran, A.N. Lasenby, S.F. Gull, S.S. Somaroo, and A.D. Challinor, Spacetime algebra and electron physics, Adv. Imag. & Elect. Phys. 95 (1996), 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S.S. Somaroo, A.N. Lasenby, and C.J.L. Doran, Geometric algebra and the causal approach to multiparticle quantum mechanics, J. Math. Phys. 40(7) (1999), 3327–3340.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J.S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 1987.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Ekert and P.L. Knight, Entangled quantum systems and the Schmidt decomposition, Am. J. Phys. 63(5) (1995), 415.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.P. Paz and W.H. Zurek, Environment-induced decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical, quant-ph/0010011.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. Hestenes, Real spinor fields, J. Math. Phys. 8(4) (1967), 798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Hestenes, Vectors, spinors, and complex numbers in classical and quantum physics, Am. J. Phys. 39 (1971), 1013.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. Hestenes and R. Gurtler, Consistency in the formulation of the Dirac, Pauli and Schrödinger theories, J. Math. Phys. 16(3) (1975), 573.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Hestenes, New Foundations for Classical Mechanics, second edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    C.J.L. Doran and A.N. Lasenby, Pysical applications of geometric algebra, Cambridge University Lecture Course. Lecture notes available from http: //www .mrao. cam. ac .uk/~clif f ord/ptIIIcourse.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    T.F. Havel and C.J.L. Doran, Geometric algebra in quantum information processing, quant-ph/0004031, AMS Contemporary Math Series, to appear.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel Parker
  • Chris J. L. Doran

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations