Advertisement

Analysis of Weight Change in HControl Design

  • Brian D. O. Anderson
  • Xavier Bombois
Chapter
  • 310 Downloads
Part of the Trends in Mathematics book series (TM)

Abstract

H∞. control design is generally performed iteratively. At each iteration, the weights constraining the desired closed loop transfer functions are adapted. The way in which the weights are adapted is generally purely heuristic. It is consequently very interesting to build some insights about the influence of a weight modification on the obtained (central) controller and, more importantly, on the obtained closed-loop transfer functions. In this paper, we analyze this influence in the case of a classical two-block problem under the assumption of “small” modifications in the weights. The concept small modificationmust be understood in the sense of small enough to allow first order approximation.

Keywords

H∞ control design J-spectral factorization Weight selection Robust control design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    G. Ferreres and V. Fromion, “Computation of the robustness margin with the skewed µ-tool,”Systems Control Lettersvol. 32, pp. 193–202, 1997.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. Glover and J. C. Doyle, “State-space formulae for all stabilizing controllers that satisfy an H∞-norm bound and relations to risk sensitivity,”Systems Control Lettersvol. 11, pp. 167–172, 1988.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Green, K. Glover, D. Limebeer, and J. Doyle, “A J-spectral factorization approach toH∞ control,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimizationvol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1350–1371, 1990.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    V. Ionescu and R. Stefan, “Chain-scattering solution to the -y-DF problem: a Popov function approach,”IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Informationvol. 17, pp. 147–165, 2000.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    H. Kimura, “Directional interpolation approach toHoptimization and robust stabilization,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Controlvol. 32, pp. 1085–1093, 1987.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Kimura, “Conjugation, interpolation and model-matching inH” International Journal of Controlvol. 49, pp. 269–307, 1989.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. KimuraChain-Scattering Approach to H-Control.Boston: Birkhäuser, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. Zames, “Feedback and optimal sensitivity: Model reference transformations, multiplicative seminorms, and approximate inverses,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Controlvol. AC-26, no. 2, pp. 301–320, April 1981.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian D. O. Anderson
    • 1
  • Xavier Bombois
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Systems Engineering Research School of Information Sciences and EngineeringAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Applied PhysicsDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations