Advertisement

Finite Frequency Characterization of Easily Controllable Plant toward Structure/Control Design Integration

  • Shinji Hara
  • Tetsuya Iwasaki
Chapter
Part of the Trends in Mathematics book series (TM)

Abstract

This paper summarizes the authors’ recent results on finite frequency characterization of easily controllable plants under control effort constraint, the aim being the development of a new approach for plant/control design integration. We first show by a motivating example that the closed-loop bandwidth achievable with a reasonable control effort is closely related to the frequency range for which the plant is high-gain and exhibits positive-realness. We then present an LMI characterization of the finite frequency Kalman—Yakubovich—Popov (KYP) lemma and derive several related conditions. Finally, the conditions for the finite frequency positive-real (FFPR) and the finite frequency high-gain (FFHG) properties are shown.

Keywords

KYP lemma Structure/control design integration Finite frequency property Passivity LMI 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    B. D. O. Anderson and S. VongpanitlerdNetwork Analysis and Synthesis.Prentice Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    T. Asai, S. Hara, and T. Iwasaki, “Simultaneous parametric uncertainty modeling and robust control synthesis by LFT scaling,”Automaticavol. 36, pp. 1457–1467, 2000.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Fan, A. Tits, and J. Doyle, “Robustness in the presence of mixed parametric uncertainty and unmodeled dynamics,”IEEE Trans. Auto. Contr.vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 25–38, 1991.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    K. M. Grigoriadis and F. Wu “IntegratedH ooplant/controller design via linear matrix inequalities,“ inProc. IEEE Conf. Decision Contr., 1997.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    K. M. Grigoriadis, G. Zhu, and R. E. Skelton, “Optimal redesign of linear systems,”ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr.vol. 118, pp. 596–605, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Hara, T. Iwasaki, and F. Shimizu “Finite frequency characterization of easily controllable mechanical systems under control effort constraint,” inProc. IFAC World Congress2002.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. Iwasaki and S. Hara,“Integrated design of dynamical systems: Requirements for easily controllable structures,” inPre-print of TITech COE/Super Mechano-Systems Workshop’ 991999, pp. 68–72.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    T. Iwasaki, S. Hara, and H. Yamauchi “Structure/control design integration with finite frequency positive real property,” inProc. American Contr. Conf.2000.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    T. Iwasaki, S. Hara, and H. Yamauchi “Dynamical system design from a control perspective: Finite frequency positive-realness approach,” submitted toIEEE Trans. Auto. Contr.2002.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    T. Iwasaki, G. Meinsma, and M. Fu, “Generalized S-procedure and finite frequency KYP lemma,”Mathematical Problems in Engineeringvol. 6, pp. 305–320, 2000.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    T. Iwasaki and G. Shibata, “LPV system analysis via quadratic separator for uncertain implicit systems,”IEEE Trans. Auto. Contr.vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1195–1208, 2001.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    I. Kajiwara and A. Nagamatsu, “An approach of optimal design for simultaneous optimization of structure and control systems using sensitivity analysis,”J. SICEvol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1140–1147, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    K. Ono and T. Teramoto, “Design methodology to stabilize the natural modes of vibration of a swing-arm positioning mechanism,”ASME Adv. Info. Storage Syst.vol. 4, pp. 343–359, 1992.Google Scholar
  14. 114]
    J. Onoda and R. Haftka, “An approach to structure/control simultaneous optimization for large flexible spacecraft,”AIAA Journalvol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1133–1138, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Rantzer, “On the Kalman¡ªYakubovich¡ªPopov lemma,”Sys. Contr. Lett., vol. 28, no. 1, 1996.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    C. Sultan and R. E. Skelton, “Integrated design of controllable tensegrity structures,” in Proc. Int. Mech. Eng. Congress, Dallas, TX, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. C. Willems, “Least squares stationary optimal control and the algebraic Riccati equation,”IEEE Trans. Auto. Contr., vol. 16, pp. 621–634, 1971.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shinji Hara
    • 1
  • Tetsuya Iwasaki
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information Physics and Computing Graduate School of Information Science and TechnologyThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations