Off Line Reference Shaping for Systems with State and Control Constraints
- 303 Downloads
This paper shows a method to shape the given reference signals for closed loop systems so as not to violate the input and state constraints of the plants. In particular, improvement of the output response is taken into account explicitly subject to the given constraints, and the method is computationally efficient because of LMI formulae. The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated by simulation and experiment.
Keywordsconstrained systems saturation servo systems LMI optimization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- K. J. Aström and L. Runqwist, “Integrator windup and how to avoid it” in Proc. American Control Conf.1989, pp. 1693–1698.Google Scholar
- E.G. Gilbert and K.T. Tan, “Nonlinear control of discrete-time linear systems with state and control constraints: A reference governor with global convergence properties,” inProc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control1994, pp. 144–149.Google Scholar
- K. Hirata and M. Fujita, “Set of admissible reference signals and control of systems with state and control constraints,” inProc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control1999, pp. 1427–1432.Google Scholar
- K. Hirata and K. Kogiso, “A performance improving off-line reference management for systems with state and control constraints,” inProc. 40th IEEE Conf. on Decision and ControlOrlando, 2001, pp. 4645–4650.Google Scholar
- P. Kapasouris and M. Athans“Control systems with rate and magnitude saturation for neutrally open loop systems,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control1990, pp. 3404–3409.Google Scholar
- P. Kapasouris, M. Athans, and G. Stein, “Design of feedback control systems for stable plants with saturating actions,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control1988, pp. 469–479.Google Scholar
- T. Sugie and T. Fukui, “Robust reference management for constrained systems and its experimental evaluation,” submitted.Google Scholar
- T. Sugie and H. Yamamoto, “Reference management for closed loop systems with state and control constraints,” inProc. American Control ConfArlington, 2001, pp. 1426–1431.Google Scholar