Skip to main content

Complexity of Systems and Controllers

  • Chapter
Control and Modeling of Complex Systems

Part of the book series: Trends in Mathematics ((TM))

  • 376 Accesses

Abstract

In this article, we introduce some recent results on the complexity of the model and controller using a unified probabilistic approach to model estimation/selection and controller design. The objective systems are assumed to include unknown random parameters with probability distributions. The first issue is what evaluation function, for model estimation, is reasonable with respect to the controller design. Second, we analyse the effects of the complexity of the parameter distribution model and the class of controller on the expectation of the evaluation functions for model estimation. Finally, we discuss the distribution of systems with a result on a metric structure of a set of analytic functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Akaike, “A new look at the statistical model identification,”IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, vol. AC-19, no. 6, pp. 716–723, 1974.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Asai, S. Hara, and T. Iwasaki, “Simultaneous modeling and synthesis for robust control by LFT scaling,” inPreprints of 13th IFAC World Congress1996, pp. 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Chen, G. Gu, and C. N. Nett, “Worst case identification of continuous time systems via interpolation,”Automaticavol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1825–1837, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Asai, S. Hara, and T. Iwasaki, “Simultaneous modeling and synthesis for robust control by LFT scaling,” inPreprints of 13th IFAC World Congress1996, pp. 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Giarre, B. Z. Kacewicz, and M. Milanese, “Model quality evaluation in set membership identification,”Automatica, vol.33, no. 6, pp. 1133–1139, 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. I. J. Good and R. A. Gaskins, “Nonparametric roughness penalties for probability densities,”Biometrika, vol.58, no. 2, pp. 255–277, 1971.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. G. C. Goodwin, M. Gevers, and B. Ninness, “Quantifying the error in estimated transfer functions with application to model order selection,”IEEE Trans.Automatic Control,vol.AC-37, pp. 913–928, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. P. J. Green, “Penalized likelihood for general semi-parametric regression models,” International Statistical Review, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 245–259, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. J. Helmicki, C. A. Jacobson, and C. N. Nett, “Control oriented system identification: A worst-case/deterministic approach inH am “ IEEETrans. Automatic Control, vol. AC-36, no. 10, pp. 1163–1176, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Hewitt and K. StrombergReal and Abstract Analysis.New York: Springer-Verlag, 1975.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Konishi and G. Kitagawa, “Generalized information criteria in model selection,” Biometrika, vol. 83, no. 4, no. 875–890, 1996.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. R. L. Kosut, M. K. Lau, and S. P. Boyd, “Set-membership identification of systems with parametric and nonparametric uncertainty,”IEEE Trans. Automatic Control vol.AC-37, no. 7, pp. 929–941, 1992.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Kullback, Information Theory and Statistics. Mathematical Statistics, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Lasota and M. C. MackeyChaos Fractals and Noise: Stochastic Aspects of Dynamics2nd ed. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 97, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Linhart and W. ZucchiniModel Selection.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. G. LorentzApproximation of Functions.New York: Chelsea Publishing Company, 1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Milanese and A. Vicino, “Optimal estimation theory for dynamic systems with set membership uncertainty: An overview,”Automaticavol. 27, pp. 997–1009, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Pinkus, n-Widths in Approximation Theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Rissanen, “Universal coding, information, prediction and estimation,”IEEE Trans. Information Theory vol. IT-30, pp. 629–636, 1984.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Schwarz, “Estimating the dimension of a model,”The Annals of Statisticsvol. 6, no. 2, pp. 461–464, 1978.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Takeuchi, “Distribution of information statistics and criteria for adequacy of models” (in Japanese)Mathematical Sciencesvol. 153, pp. 12–18, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. M. Tichomirov, “Diameters of sets in function spaces,” Uspehi Mat. Nauk, Russian Math Surveys, vol. 15, pp. 75–111, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Tsumura, “Information criterion for model selection with controller design,” inProceedings of the 12th IFAC Symposium on System IdentificationSanta Barbara, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Tsumura“Metric structure of a set of analytic functions,” in Proceedings of the 30th SICE Symposium on Control Theory, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. Tsumura, “Unification of modeling, estimation and controller design,” inProceedings of the 40th Conference on Decision and Control2001, pp. 1995–2000.

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Tsumura, “Unification of modeling, estimation and controller design,” submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  27. K. Tsumura and H. Kimura“Criterion for selection of model and controller design based on IO data,” in Proceedings of the 39th Conference on Decision and Control2000, pp. 2837–2842.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. Tsumura and S. Shin“Simultaneous modeling and data-distribution-dependent robust control system design,” in Preprints of the 11th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Kitakyushu1997, pp. 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. G. VitushkinTheory of the Transmission and Processing of Information.New York: Pergamon, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. Zames, “On the metric complexity of causal linear systems:e-entropy and E-dimension for continuous time,”IEEE Trans. Automatic Controlvol. AC-24, no. 2, pp. 222–230, 1979.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. G. Zames and J. G. Owen, “A note on metric dimension and feedback in distance time,”IEEE Trans. Automatic Controlvol. AC-38, no. 4, pp. 664–667, 1993.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tsumura, K. (2003). Complexity of Systems and Controllers. In: Hashimoto, K., Oishi, Y., Yamamoto, Y. (eds) Control and Modeling of Complex Systems. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0023-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0023-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6577-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0023-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics