Skip to main content

Reform of the Energy Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Economics

Abstract

This chapter discusses the reform and restructuring of energy industries and presents the issues related to these structural changes in the energy industry. The chapter starts with a discussion about the economic rationale for government intervention in the energy sector, and the changes that weakened these arguments. Alternative reform models are then presented along with their pros and cons. It also presents a set of factors that determine the substainability of any reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A public good is characterised by non-exclusivity and non-rivalry. Non-exclusivity implies that it is difficult to exclude others from using the good or service without withholding the good or service. Non-rivalry on the other hand means that consumption by one does not reduce its potential to be used by others.

  2. 2.

    See Tenenbaum et al. (1992), Hunt and Shuttleworth (1996), Newbery (1999), World Bank (2004), IEA (1999, 2001) and Ljung (2007) for further details.

  3. 3.

    See also RAP (2000).

  4. 4.

    This consists of (a) identifying the objectives and constraints of reform , (b) analysing how these are taken care of and identifying the threat to reform and (c) to suggest improvements/modifications to remove the threats.

  5. 5.

    These include credibility of the regulator, use of simple instruments, avoiding problems of euphoria or pessimism, etc.

References

  • Arizu, B., Gencer, D., & Maurer, L. (2006). Centralised Purchasing Arrangements: International Practices and Lessons learnt on Variations to the Single Buyer Model, Discussion Paper 16, Energy and Mining Sector Board, World Bank (see World Bank website).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, R., & Besant-Jones, W. (2001). Global electric power reform, privatisation and liberalisation of the electric power industry in developing countries. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 26, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. F., & Halpern, J. (2000). The role of energy subsidies, Chapter 7, in Energy Services for the World’s poor, ESMAP, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1982). Contestable markets: An uprising in the theory of industry structure. The American Economic Review, 72(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavides, J. M. (2003). Can reforms be made sustainable? Analysis and design considerations for the electricity sector, Technical Paper, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, S. C., & Dey, P. (2003). Selection of power market structure using the analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 20(1), 36–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2007a). Power sector reform in South Asia: Why slow and limited so far? Energy Policy, 35(1), 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2007b). Sustainability of power sector reform in India: What does recent experience suggest. Special Issue of Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(2), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. J., Palmer, K. L., & Martinez, S. A. (2002). Alternating currents: Electricity markets and public policy. Resources for the Future, Chapter 15: Restructuring and environment protection. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J., & Mun, Y. (2003). Rethinking reform in electricity sector: Power liberalisation or energy transformation? In N. Wamukonya (Ed.), 2003. Electricity reform: Social and environmental challenges, UNEP, Riso, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira, A., & MacKerron, G. (1992). Is the World Bank approach to structural reform supported by experience of electricity privatisation in the UK? Energy Policy, February, pp. 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira, A. (1997). Electricity system reform: World Bank approach and Latin American reality. Energy for Sustainable Development, 3(6), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubash, N. (Ed.). (2002). Power politics: Equity and environment in electricity reform. Washington, D.C: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA. (1996). The changing structure of the electric power industry: An update. Washington, D.C.: Energy Information Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, V., Witte, S., Ghosh Banerjee, S., & Moreno, A. (2017). Charting the diffusion of power sector reforms across the developing world, Policy Research Working Paper 8235, The World Bank, Washington DC. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/576801510076208252/pdf/WPS8235.pdf.

  • Guasch, J. L., & Spiller, P. (1999). Managing the regulatory process: Design, concepts, issues and the Latin American and Caribbean story, World Bank, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, T. C., & Victor, D. (2004). A political economy of electric power market restructuring: introduction to issues and expectations, Working paper 1, Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, Stanford University, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S., & Shuttleworth, G. (1996). Competition and choice in electricity. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (1999). Electricity Market reform: An IEA Handbook. Paris: International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2001). Competition in electricity markets. Paris: International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, M. (1995). Oscillating currents: The changing rationale for government intervention in the electricity industry. Energy Policy, 23(7), 579–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. (2000). Deregulation and regulatory reform in the US electric power sector, MIT Discussion paper. http://www.iasa.ca/ED_documents_various/joskow03.pdf.

  • Klein, M. (1996). Competition in network industries. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. D., & Usman, Z. (2018). Taking stock of the political economy of power sector reforms in developing countries: A literature review, Policy Research Working Paper 8518, The World Bank, Washington DC. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/431981531320704737/pdf/WPS8518.pdf.

  • Ljung, P. (2007). Energy sector reform: strategies for growth, equity and sustainability, SIDA Studies 20, Swedish International Development Corporation Agency, Stockholm. https://www.sida.se/contentassets/1c3b428bc150489faeef9e796dbc8113/14096.pdf.

  • Lovei, L. (2000). The single buyer model: a dangerous path toward competitive electricity markets, Public Policy for the Private Sector, World Bank, Note 225, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. M. G. (1999). Privatisation, restructuring and regulation of network utilities. Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAP. (2000). Best practices guide: Implementing power sector reform. Vermont, USA: Regulatory Assistance Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenenbaum, B. R., Lock & Barker, J. (1992). Electricity privatization: structural, competitive and regulatory options. Energy Policy, 1134–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, D. P., Gülen, G., Hebner, R., King, C. W., Spence, D. B., Andrade, J., Wible, J. A., Baldwick, R., & Duncan, R., The History and Evolution of the U.S. Electricity Industry. White Paper UTEI/2016-05-2, 2016, available at https://energy.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/UTAustin_FCe_History_2016.pdf.

  • Von der Fehr, N.-H. M., & Milan, J. J. (2001). Sustainability of power sector reform in Latin America: An analytical framework, Working paper, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrolijk, C. (ed.) (2002). Climate change and power: Economic instruments for European Electricity. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wamukonya, N. (Ed.). (2003). Electricity Reform: Social and environmental challenges. UNEP Riso Centre, Denmark: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1995). Bureaucrats in business: The economics and politics of government ownership. Waashington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2004). Reforming infrastructure: privatisation, regulation and competition, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, C., Zhao, Q., Zhang, G., & Xiong, B. (2016). Energy revolution: from a fossil energy era to a new energy era. Natural Gas Industry B, 3(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhes C. Bhattacharyya .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bhattacharyya, S.C. (2019). Reform of the Energy Sector. In: Energy Economics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7468-4_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics