Skip to main content

Use of Risk Indicators for Major Hazard Risk

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Offshore Risk Assessment Vol. 2

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

  • 683 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter starts with a general discussion on the indicators of major hazard risk, followed by a discussion of the Risk Level project by PSA in Norway and the lessons learned from this project with respect to major hazard risk indicators. The final part discusses how major hazard risk indicators should be used by individual companies and installations, in order to control major hazard risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    2011 was the last year with available detailed data at the time of the manuscript preparation, 2017 is the last year with available overall data.

References

  1. Safety Science (2009) Special issue, vol 47, no 4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vinnem JE (2000) Risk monitoring for major hazards, SPE paper 61283. In: Presented at the SPE international conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and production, Stavanger, 26–28 June 2000

    Google Scholar 

  3. Øien K, Sklet S (1999) Risk control during operation of offshore petroleum installations. In: Proceedings of ESREL=99, Munich, October, 1999. Balkema, pp 1297–1302

    Google Scholar 

  4. HSE (1995) Prevention of fire and explosion, and emergency response regulations. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Total E&P Norway (1998) Health, safety and environment. Annual report for 1997. Total E&P, Stavanger

    Google Scholar 

  6. Øien K, Sklet S, Nielsen L (1997) Risk level indicators for surveillance of changes in risk level. In: European safety and reliability conference 1997. Lisboa, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baker J (2007) The report of the BP U.S. refineries independent safety review panel, ‘Baker report’, January 2007

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kjellén U (2009) The safety measurement problem revisited. Saf Sci 4(47):486–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ale B (2009) More thinking about process safety indicators. Saf Sci 47(4):470–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zwetsloot GIJM (2009) Prospects and limitations of process safety performance indicators. Saf Sci 47(4):495–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kvitrud A, Ersdal G, Leonardsen RL (2001) On the risk of structural failure on Norwegian offshore installations. In: Proceedings of ISOPE 2001, 11th international offshore and polar engineering conference, Stavanger, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kjellén U (2000) Prevention of accidents through experience feedback. Taylor & Francis, London and NY

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rockwell TH (1959) Safety performance measurement. J Ind Eng 10:12–16

    Google Scholar 

  14. Øien K (2001) A framework for the establishment of organizational risk indicators. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 74(2):147–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aven T (2003) Foundations of risk analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Vinnem JE et al (2006) Major hazard risk indicator for monitoring of trends in the Norwegian offshore petroleum sector. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(7):778–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aven T, Vinnem JE (2007) Risk management, with applications from the offshore oil and gas industry. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tharaldsen JE, Olsen E, Rundmo T (2008) A longitudinal study of safety climate on the Norwegian continental shelf. Saf Sci 46(3):427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huber et al (2008) Learning from organisational incidents: resilience engineering for high-risk process environments. Process Saf Prog 28(1):90–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. PSA (2011) Guidelines to regulations relating yo material and information in the petroleum activities (the information duty regulations). Petroleum Safety Authority, 1 January 2011

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heide B (2009) Monitoring major hazard risk for industrial sectors. PhD thesis, University of Stavanger

    Google Scholar 

  22. PSA (2019) Trends in risk level on the Norwegian continental shelf, main report, (in Norwegian only, English summary report). Petroleum Safety Authority, Stavanger, 11 April 2019

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sklet S (2006) Safety barriers; definition, classification and performance. J Loss Prev Process Ind 19:494–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vinnem JE, Aven T, Sørum M, Øien K (2003) Structured approach to risk indicators for major hazards. In: Presented at the ESREL 2003 conference. Maastrict, 16–18 June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vinnem JE, Hestad JA, Kvaløy JT, Skogdalen JE (2010) Analysis of root causes of major hazard precursors in the offshore petroleum industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95(11):1142–1153

    Google Scholar 

  26. HSE (1996) The offshore installations and wells (design and construction, etc.) regulations. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vinnem JE, Pedersen JI, Rosenthal P (1996) Efficient risk management: use of computerized QRA model for safety improvements to an existing installation. In: 3rd international conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and production, New Orleans, USA. SPE paper 35775

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vinnem JE (1997) On the sensitivity of offshore QRA studies. In: European safety and reliability conference, 1997, Lisboa, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  29. NPD (1992) Regulations relating to explosion and fire protection of installations in the petroleum activities. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Stavanger, 1992, February

    Google Scholar 

  30. Syvertsen R (2006) Weight of importance for barriers in the offshore oil and gas industry. MSc thesis, University of Stavanger

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hale A (2009) Why safety performance indicators. Saf Sci 47(4):479–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vinnem JE (2010) Risk indicators for major hazards on offshore installations. Saf Sci 48(6):18p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thomassen O, Sørum M (2002) Mapping and monitoring the safety level, SPE 73923. In: Presented at SPE international conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and production, Kuala Lumpur, 20–22 March 2002

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vinnem JE et al (2007) Operational safety condition—concept development. In: Paper presented at ESREL 2007, Stavanger, 25–27 June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vinnem JE (2008) On causes and dependencies of errors in human and organizational barriers against major accidents. In: Presented at ESREL2008, Valencia, 22–25 September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  36. Høivik D, Moen BE, Mearns K, Haukelid K (2009) An explorative study of health, safety and environment culture in a Norwegian petroleum company. Saf Sci 47(7):992–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Austnes-Underhaug R et al (2011) Learning from incidents in Statoil (in Norwegian only). IRIS report 2011/156, 21 September 2011. Available from www.statoil.com

  38. Rosness R, Guttormsen G, Steiro T, Tinmannsvik RK, Herrera IA (2004) Organisational accidents and resilient organisations: five perspectives. SINTEF report STF38 A 04403

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hansen HN, Rekdal O (2015) Barrier management for Goliat (in Norwegian only). ESRA Norway, 25 March 2015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan-Erik Vinnem .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vinnem, JE., Røed, W. (2020). Use of Risk Indicators for Major Hazard Risk. In: Offshore Risk Assessment Vol. 2. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7448-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7448-6_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-7447-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-7448-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics