Abstract
In spite of the new microsurgical techniques, the prognosis of perforating injuries in many cases is still quite poor and is dependent mostly on the severity of the primary injury. Because perforating eye injuries most commonly affect people at the working age, they cause loss of working days and, at the worst, permanent disability and, thus, great cost to the society. Furthermore, loss of visual function even in one eye is always a great individual tragedy. The term “perforating eye injury” describes a very specific type of ocular injury where there are two wounds that are caused by the same agent: one of the wounds is the entrance site, whereas the other one is the exit site of that agent. This terminology was defined by “the Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System” (BETTS) (Kuhn et al. 2002). They are open-globe injuries as defined by BETTS and need to be treated as open-globe injuries in the first place.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Azad RV, Kumar N, Sharma YR, et al. Role of prophylactic scleral buckling in the management of retained intraocular foreign bodies. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32:58–61.
Bajaire B, Oudovitchenko E, Morales E. Vitreoretinal surgery of the posterior segment for explosive trauma in terrorist warfare. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:991–5.
Behrens-Baumann W, Praetorius G. Intraocular foreign bodies. 297 consecutive cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1989;198:84–8.
Bhagat N, Nagori S, Zarbin M. Post-traumatic infectious endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56:214–51.
Brinton GS, Aaberg TM, Reeser FH, et al. Surgical results in ocular trauma involving the posterior segment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;93:271–8.
Chaudhry IA, Shamsi FA, Al-Harthi E, et al. Incidence and visual outcome of endophthalmitis associated with intraocular foreign bodies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246:181–6.
Cinotti AA, Maltzman BA. Prognosis and treatment of perforating ocular injuries. The John Luhr memorial lecture. Ophthalmic Surg. 1975;6:54–61.
Cleary PE, Ryan SJ. Method of production and natural history of experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rhesus monkey. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979;88:212–20.
Colyer MH, Chun DW, Bower KS, et al. Perforating globe injuries during operation Iraqi Freedom. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:2087–93.
Colyer MH, Weber ED, Weichel ED, et al. Delayed intraocular foreign body removal without endophthalmitis during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1439–47.
Cupples HP, Whitmore PV, Wertz FD. Ocular trauma treated by vitreous surgery. Retina. 1983;3:103–7.
El-Asrar AM, Al-Amro SA, Khan NM, et al. Visual outcome and prognostic factors after vitrectomy for posterior segment foreign bodies. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2000;10:304–11.
Essex RW, Yi Q, Charles PG, et al. Post-traumatic endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2015–22.
Ferreira N, Monteiro S, Meireles A, et al. Outcome of vitrectomy and chorioretinectomy in perforating eye injuries. Ophthalmic Res. 2015;53(4):200–6.
Ghoraba HH, Ellakwa AF, Ghali AA, et al. Long-term results of 360A degrees scleral buckling and vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for management of gunshot-perforating ocular injury. Eye. 2012;26:1318–23.
Hariprasad SM, Shah GK, Mieler WF, et al. Vitreous and aqueous penetration of orally administered moxifloxacin in humans. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:178–82.
Hermsen V. Vitrectomy in severe ocular trauma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1984;189:86–92.
Jandeck C, Kellner U, Bornfeld N, et al. Open globe injuries in children. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:420–6.
Jonas JB, Budde WM. Early versus late removal of retained intraocular foreign bodies. Retina. 1999;19:193–7.
Kruger EF, Nguyen QD, Ramos-Lopez M, et al. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy after trauma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2002;42:129–43.
Kuhn F, Mester V, Morris R. A proactive treatment approach for eyes with perforating injury. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004;221:622–8.
Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT): terminology and classification of mechanical eye injuries. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2002;15:139–43.
Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Mann L. Blunt-force injuries involving the posterior segment. Retinal Physician. 2007;4:20–24.
Kuhn F, Teixeira S, Pelayes DE. Late versus prophylactic chorioretinectomy for the prevention of trauma-related proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2012;48 Suppl 1:32–7.
Ma J, Zhang Y, Moe MC, et al. Transocular removal of a retrobulbar foreign body and internal patch of the posterior exit wound with autologous tenon capsule. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:493–6.
Martin DF, Meredith TA, Topping TM, et al. Perforating (through-and-through) injuries of the globe. Surgical results with vitrectomy. Arch ophthalmol. 1991;109:951–6.
May DR, Kuhn FP, Morris RE, et al. The epidemiology of serious eye injuries from the United States Eye Injury Registry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:153–7.
Meredith TA, Gordon PA. Pars plana vitrectomy for severe penetrating injury with posterior segment involvement. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;103:549–54.
Mester V, Kuhn F. Ferrous intraocular foreign bodies retained in the posterior segment: management options and results. Int Ophthalmol. 1998;22:355–62.
Miyake Y, Ando F. Surgical results of vitrectomy in ocular trauma. Retina. 1983;3:265–8.
Moisseiev J, Vidne O, Treister G. Vitrectomy and silicone oil injection in pediatric patients. Retina. 1998;18:221–7.
Moreira Jr CA, Debert-Ribeiro M, Belfort Jr R. Epidemiological study of eye injuries in Brazilian children. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:781–4.
Niiranen M. Perforating eye injuries. A comparative epidemiological, prognostic and socie-economic study of patients treated in 1930–39 and 1950–59. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1978;135:1–87.
Niiranen M. Perforating eye injuries treated at Helsinki University Eye Hospital 1970 to 1977. Ann Ophthalmol. 1981;13:957–61.
Ozdek S, Hasanreisoglu M, Yuksel E. Chorioretinectomy for perforating eye injuries. Eye (Lond). 2013;27(6):722–7.
Punnonen E. Epidemiological and social aspects of perforating eye injuries. Acta Ophthalmol. 1989;67:492–8.
Punnonen E. Pathological findings in eyes enucleated because of perforating injury. Acta Ophthalmol. 1990;68:265–9.
Punnonen E, Laatikainen L. Long-term follow-up and the role of vitrectomy in the treatment of perforating eye injuries without intraocular foreign bodies. Acta Ophthalmol. 1989;67:625–32.
Ryan SJ. Guidelines in the management of penetrating ocular trauma with emphasis on the role and timing of pars plana vitrectomy. Int Ophthalmol. 1979;1:105–8.
Sakamoto H, Sakamoto M, Hata Y, et al. Aqueous and vitreous penetration of levofloxacin after topical and/or oral administration. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17:372–6.
Schmidt JC, Mennel S, Horle S, et al. ‘Ab interno’ intravitreal suturing of a large traumatic scleral perforation at the posterior pole. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1721–2.
Scott IU, Flynn Jr HW, Azen SP, et al. Silicone oil in the repair of pediatric complex retinal detachments: a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1399–407.
Sobaci G, Akin T, Erdem U, et al. Ocular trauma score in deadly weapon-related open-globe injuries. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:760–1.
Soylu M, Demircan N, Yalaz M, et al. Etiology of pediatric perforating eye injuries in southern Turkey. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998;5:7–12.
Spalding SC, Sternberg Jr P. Controversies in the management of posterior segment ocular trauma. Retina. 1990;10 Suppl 1:76–82.
Stone TW, Siddiqui N, Arroyo JG, et al. Primary scleral buckling in open-globe injury involving the posterior segment. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1923–6.
Szijarto Z, Gaal V, Kovacs B, et al. Prognosis of penetrating eye injuries with posterior segment intraocular foreign body. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246:161–5.
Thompson CG, Kumar N, Billson FA, et al. The aetiology of perforating ocular injuries in children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:920–2.
Thompson JT, Parver LM, Enger CL, et al. Infectious endophthalmitis after penetrating injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. National Eye Trauma System. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1468–74.
Topping TM, Abrams GW, Machemer R. Experimental double-perforating injury of the posterior segment in rabbit eyes: the natural history of intraocular proliferation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:735–42.
Uysal Y, Mutlu FM, Sobaci G. Ocular Trauma Score in childhood open-globe injuries. J Trauma. 2008;65:1284–6.
Wani VB, Al-Ajmi M, Thalib L, et al. Vitrectomy for posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies: visual results and prognostic factors. Retina. 2003;23:654–60.
Weichel ED, Bower KS, Colyer MH. Chorioretinectomy for perforating or severe intraocular foreign body injuries. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248:319–30.
Woodcock MG, Scott RA, Huntbach J, et al. Mass and shape as factors in intraocular foreign body injuries. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:2262–9.
Zhang Y, Zhang M, Jiang C, et al. Intraocular foreign bodies in china: clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and visual outcomes in 1,421 eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:66–73.
Zivojnovic R. Silicone oil in vitreoretinal surgery. Chap 5. In: Surgical techniuqes. Dordrecht: Marinus Nijhoff; 1987. p. 45–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ozdek, S., Hasanreisoglu, M. (2016). Current Concepts and Management of Severely Traumatized Tissues in the Inner Coatings (the Posterior Segment: the Ciliary Body, the Choroid, and the Retina) of the Globe: Mechanical Injuries, Perforating Injury. In: Sobacı, G. (eds) Current Concepts and Management of Eye Injuries. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7302-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7302-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-7300-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-7302-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)