Skip to main content

Template Aging in Iris Biometrics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Iris Recognition

Abstract

Using a data set with approximately 4 years of elapsed time between the earliest and most recent images of an iris (23 subjects, 46 irises, 6,797 images), we investigate template aging for iris biometrics. We compare the match and non-match distributions for short-time-lapse image pairs, acquired with no more than 120 days of time lapse between them, to the distributions for long-time-lapse image pairs, with at least 1,200 days of time lapse. We find no substantial difference in the non-match, or impostor, distribution between the short-time-lapse and the long-time-lapse data. We do find a difference in the match, or authentic, distributions. For the image dataset and iris biometric systems used in this work, the false reject rate increases by about 50 % or greater for the long-time-lapse data relative to the short-time-lapse data. The magnitude of the increase in the false reject rate varies with changes in the decision threshold, and with different matching algorithms. Our results demonstrate that iris biometrics is subject to a template aging effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. P. Artal, Aging effects on the optics of the eye, in Age-Related Changes of the Human Eye (Springer, 2008), pp. 35–44

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Atchison et al., Age-related changes in optical and biometric characteristics of emmetropic eyes. J. Vis. 8(4), 1–20 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Baker, K. Bowyer, P. Flynn, Empirical evidence for correct iris match score degradation with increased time-lapse between gallery and probe matches, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Biometrics, 2009, pp. 1170–1179

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Baker et al., Degradation of iris recognition performance due to non-cosmetic prescription contact lenses. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 114(9), 1030–1044 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Bito, A. Matheny, O.C.K. Cruickshanksa, D. Nondahl, Eye color changes past early childhood. Arch. Ophthalmol. 115, 659–663 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Carls et al., Biometric enhancements: Template aging error score analysis, in 8th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2008, pp. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Daugman, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 21–30 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Daugman, New methods in iris recognition. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 37(5), 1167–1175 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S.P. Fenker, Experimental evidence of a template aging effect in iris biometrics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Flom, A. Safir, Iris recognition systems. U.S. Patent No. 4641394 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Flom, A. Safir, D. Hu, Photobiology of the uveal tract, in Photobiological Sciences Online (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Hollingsworth, K.W. Bowyer, P.J. Flynn, Pupil dilation degrades iris biometric performance. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Hollingsworth, K.W. Bowyer, P.J. Flynn, Similarity of iris texture between identical twins, in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Biometrics Workshop, June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Lanitis, A survey of the effects of aging on biometric identity verification. Int. J. Biometr. 2(1), 34–62 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. LG, (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. X. Liu, K.W. Bowyer, P. Flynn, Experiments with an improved iris segmentation algorithm, in Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Technologies, Oct 2005, pp. 118–123

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Miyazawa, et al., IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30, 1741–1756 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Miyazawa et al., Aging and the Eye (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Monro, S. Rakshit, D. Zhang, DCT-based iris recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 4(29), 586–595 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Monro, S. Rakshit, D. Zhang, Iris Challenge Evaluation (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. NeuroTechnology, VeriEye SDK

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Phillips et al., Face Recognition Vendor Test 2002: Overview and Summary (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Phillips et al., The iris challenge evaluation 2005, in Proceedings of the Second IEEE Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Ryu, J. Jang, H. Kim, Analysis of effect of fingerprint sample quality in template aging, in NIST Biometric Quality Workshop, vol. II, 2007, pp. 7–8

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. I. T. W. I. I. R. B. Scalability (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Thornton, M. Savvides, V. Kumar, A Bayesian approach to deformed pattern matching of iris images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29(4), 596–606 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. P. Tome-Gonzalez, F. Alonso-Fernandez, J. Ortega-Garcia, On the effects of time variability in iris recognition, in Proceedings of the Second IEEE Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. U. Uludag, A. Ross, A. Jain, Biometric template selection and update: a case study in fingerprints. Pattern Recogn. 37, 1533–1542 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. B. Winn et al., Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Investig. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 35(3), 1132–1137 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. Wright, P. Spiegel, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

SEB, KWB, and PJF were supported by the National Science Foundation under grant CNS01-30839, by the Central Intelligence Agency, by the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity and by the Technical Support Working Group under US Army contract W91CRB-08-C-0093. PJP acknowledges the support of the the Biometric Task Force, the Department of Homeland Security’s Directorate for Science and Technology, the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Technical Support Working Group (TSWG).

The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our sponsors. The identification of any commercial product or trade name does not imply endorsement or recommendation by the authors, the University of Notre Dame, or the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin W. Bowyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baker, S.E., Bowyer, K.W., Flynn, P.J., Phillips, P.J. (2016). Template Aging in Iris Biometrics. In: Bowyer, K., Burge, M. (eds) Handbook of Iris Recognition. Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6784-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6784-6_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6782-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6784-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics