Abstract
Using a data set with approximately 4 years of elapsed time between the earliest and most recent images of an iris (23 subjects, 46 irises, 6,797 images), we investigate template aging for iris biometrics. We compare the match and non-match distributions for short-time-lapse image pairs, acquired with no more than 120 days of time lapse between them, to the distributions for long-time-lapse image pairs, with at least 1,200 days of time lapse. We find no substantial difference in the non-match, or impostor, distribution between the short-time-lapse and the long-time-lapse data. We do find a difference in the match, or authentic, distributions. For the image dataset and iris biometric systems used in this work, the false reject rate increases by about 50 % or greater for the long-time-lapse data relative to the short-time-lapse data. The magnitude of the increase in the false reject rate varies with changes in the decision threshold, and with different matching algorithms. Our results demonstrate that iris biometrics is subject to a template aging effect.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
P. Artal, Aging effects on the optics of the eye, in Age-Related Changes of the Human Eye (Springer, 2008), pp. 35–44
D. Atchison et al., Age-related changes in optical and biometric characteristics of emmetropic eyes. J. Vis. 8(4), 1–20 (2008)
S. Baker, K. Bowyer, P. Flynn, Empirical evidence for correct iris match score degradation with increased time-lapse between gallery and probe matches, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Biometrics, 2009, pp. 1170–1179
S. Baker et al., Degradation of iris recognition performance due to non-cosmetic prescription contact lenses. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 114(9), 1030–1044 (2010)
L. Bito, A. Matheny, O.C.K. Cruickshanksa, D. Nondahl, Eye color changes past early childhood. Arch. Ophthalmol. 115, 659–663 (1997)
J. Carls et al., Biometric enhancements: Template aging error score analysis, in 8th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2008, pp. 1–8
J. Daugman, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 21–30 (2004)
J. Daugman, New methods in iris recognition. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 37(5), 1167–1175 (2007)
S.P. Fenker, Experimental evidence of a template aging effect in iris biometrics (2011)
L. Flom, A. Safir, Iris recognition systems. U.S. Patent No. 4641394 (1987)
L. Flom, A. Safir, D. Hu, Photobiology of the uveal tract, in Photobiological Sciences Online (1987)
K. Hollingsworth, K.W. Bowyer, P.J. Flynn, Pupil dilation degrades iris biometric performance. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. (2009)
K. Hollingsworth, K.W. Bowyer, P.J. Flynn, Similarity of iris texture between identical twins, in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Biometrics Workshop, June 2010
A. Lanitis, A survey of the effects of aging on biometric identity verification. Int. J. Biometr. 2(1), 34–62 (2010)
LG, (2010)
X. Liu, K.W. Bowyer, P. Flynn, Experiments with an improved iris segmentation algorithm, in Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Technologies, Oct 2005, pp. 118–123
K. Miyazawa, et al., IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30, 1741–1756 (2008)
K. Miyazawa et al., Aging and the Eye (2008)
D. Monro, S. Rakshit, D. Zhang, DCT-based iris recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 4(29), 586–595 (2007)
D. Monro, S. Rakshit, D. Zhang, Iris Challenge Evaluation (2006)
NeuroTechnology, VeriEye SDK
P. Phillips et al., Face Recognition Vendor Test 2002: Overview and Summary (2000)
P. Phillips et al., The iris challenge evaluation 2005, in Proceedings of the Second IEEE Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems (2008)
J. Ryu, J. Jang, H. Kim, Analysis of effect of fingerprint sample quality in template aging, in NIST Biometric Quality Workshop, vol. II, 2007, pp. 7–8
L. I. T. W. I. I. R. B. Scalability (2009)
J. Thornton, M. Savvides, V. Kumar, A Bayesian approach to deformed pattern matching of iris images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29(4), 596–606 (2007)
P. Tome-Gonzalez, F. Alonso-Fernandez, J. Ortega-Garcia, On the effects of time variability in iris recognition, in Proceedings of the Second IEEE Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (2008)
U. Uludag, A. Ross, A. Jain, Biometric template selection and update: a case study in fingerprints. Pattern Recogn. 37, 1533–1542 (2008)
B. Winn et al., Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Investig. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 35(3), 1132–1137 (1994)
K. Wright, P. Spiegel, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (2003)
Acknowledgments
SEB, KWB, and PJF were supported by the National Science Foundation under grant CNS01-30839, by the Central Intelligence Agency, by the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity and by the Technical Support Working Group under US Army contract W91CRB-08-C-0093. PJP acknowledges the support of the the Biometric Task Force, the Department of Homeland Security’s Directorate for Science and Technology, the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Technical Support Working Group (TSWG).
The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our sponsors. The identification of any commercial product or trade name does not imply endorsement or recommendation by the authors, the University of Notre Dame, or the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baker, S.E., Bowyer, K.W., Flynn, P.J., Phillips, P.J. (2016). Template Aging in Iris Biometrics. In: Bowyer, K., Burge, M. (eds) Handbook of Iris Recognition. Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6784-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6784-6_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6782-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6784-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)