Technological Knowledge and Organizational Learning



Innovation and knowledge are intimately connected. Firms and individuals are able to innovate thanks to the knowledge they possess, while the process of innovation they are engaged in, can—in turn—influence their knowledge. As we will soon see, this emphasis on knowledge has led students of innovation to develop a very specific perspective on the nature of firms, based on knowledge assets and learning capabilities. So, the first point to be covered is the definition of knowledge and its role in technology and science.


Competitive Advantage Tacit Knowledge Absorptive Capacity Procedural Knowledge Knowledge Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Argote L (1999) Organizational learning: creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. Argote L, Epple D, Rao RD, Murphy K (1997) The acquisition and depreciation of knowledge in a manufacturing organization: turnover and plant productivity. Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Working paperGoogle Scholar
  3. Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Manag Sci 49(4):571–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120Google Scholar
  5. Cohen WM, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Denrell J (2004) Random walks and sustained competitive advantage. Manag Sci 50(7):922–934MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strateg Manag J 25(8–9):909–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: cognitive and experiential search. Adm Sci Q 45(1):113–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Groysberg B, McLean A, Nohria N (2006) Are leaders portable? Harvard Bus Rev 84(5):92–100Google Scholar
  10. Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530Google Scholar
  11. Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organ Sci 2(1):88–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knott AM (2008) R&D Returns causality: absorptive capacity or organizational IQ. Manag Sci 54(12):2054–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 3(3):383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee D, Van den Steen EJ (2010) Managing know-how. Manag Sci 56(2):270–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. March JG (1990) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nelson RR, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harward University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Poincaré H (1902) La science et l’hypothèse. Flammarion, ParisMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Simon H (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vincenti W (1990) What engineers know and how they know it. John Hopkins university Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  22. Von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation. Manag Sci 40(4):429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhou KZ, Wu F (2010) Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strateg Manag J 31:547–561Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations