Skip to main content

Meta-design: Transforming and Enriching the Design and Use of Socio-technical Systems

  • Chapter
Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real-World

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

Abstract

The meta-design of socio-technical systems (STSs) is an approach which complies with the need of integrating two different types of structures and processes: technical systems which are engineered to provide anticipatable and reliable interactions between users and systems and social systems which are contingent in their interactions and a subject of evolution. Meta-design is focused on objectives, techniques, and processes to allow users to act as designers. In doing so, it does not provide fixed solutions but a framework within which all stakeholders (designers and users) can contribute to the development of technical functionality and the evolution of the social side such as organizational change, knowledge construction, and continuous learning.

This paper describes the possibilities of transforming and enriching the design and use of STSs grounded in the conceptual framework of meta-design. It explores cultures of participation, seeding, evolutionary growth and reseeding, and underdesign as specific components of the framework. Two specific examples of meta-designed STSs illustrate the conceptual framework, and findings derived from the assessment of these developments in practice are briefly discussed. Based on the combination of conceptual and methodological consideration, initial guidelines for the meta-design of STSs are derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen, R., & Mørch, A. (2009). Mutual development: A case study in customer-initiated software product development. In V. Pipek, M. B. Rossen, B. de Ruyter, & V. Wulf (Eds.), End-user development (pp. 31–49). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arias, E. G., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., & Scharff, E. (2001). Transcending the individual human mind—Creating shared understanding through collaborative design. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Human-computer interaction in the new millennium (pp. 347–372). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2010). The upside of irrationality—The unexpected benefits of defying logic at work and at home. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. E., Lau, F., Myers, M. D., & Nielsen, P. A. (1999). Action research. Communications of the ACM, 42(1), 94–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based peer production and virtue. Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, T., DeMichelis, G., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P., & Wagner, I. (2011). Design things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budweg, S., Draxler, S., Lohmann, S., Rashid, A., & Stevens, G. (2009). Open design spaces supporting user innovation. In Proceedings of the international workshop on open design spaces; international reports on socio-informatics, 6(2). Available at http://www.iisi.de/fileadmin/IISI/upload/IRSI/IRSIV6I2.pdf.

  • Carmien, S. (2006). Socio-technical environments supporting distributed cognition for persons with cognitive disabilities. Phd thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Colorado, Boulder. Available at http://www.scarmien.com/papers/dissertation_sm.pdf.

  • Carmien, S., Dawe, M., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., Kintsch, A., & Sullivan, J. F. (2005). Socio-technical environments supporting people with cognitive disabilities using public transportation. Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction (ToCHI), 12(2), 233–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmien, S. P., & Fischer, G. (2008). Design, adoption, and assessment of a socio-technical environment supporting independence for persons with cognitive disabilities. In Proceedings of CHI 2008 (pp. 597–607). Florence: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finholt, T., & Olson, G. M. (1997). From laboratories to collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Science, 8, 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (2001). Communities of interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge systems. In 24th annual information systems research seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS’24) (pp. 1–14). Ulvik, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (2002). Beyond ‘couch potatoes’: From consumers to designers and active contributors, in Firstmonday. Peer-Reviewed Journal on the Internet. Available at http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_12/fischer/

  • Fischer, G. (2011, May + June). Understanding, fostering, and supporting cultures of participation. ACM Interactions, XVIII(3), 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., & Giaccardi, E. (2006). Meta-design: A framework for the future of end user development. In H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, & V. Wulf (Eds.), End user development (pp. 427–457). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., & Herrmann, T. (2011). Socio-technical systems: A meta-design perspective. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 3(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K., & Ye, Y. (2009, September/October). Meta-design: Guidelines for supporting domain experts in software development. IEEE Software, 26, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., & Ostwald, J. (2002). Seeding, evolutionary growth, and reseeding: Enriching participatory design with informed participation. In Proceedings of the participatory design conference (PDC’02) (pp. 135–143). Sweden: Malmö University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Piccinno, A., & Ye, Y. (2008). The ecology of participants in co-evolving socio-technical environments. In P. Forbrig & F. Paternò (Eds.), Engineering interactive systems (Proceedings of 2nd conference on human-centered software engineering) (Vol. LNCS 5247, pp. 279–286). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habraken, N. J. (1972). Supports: An alternative to mass housing. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A., & Kyng, M. (1991). There’s no place like home: Continuing design in use. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 219–240). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T. (2003). Learning and teaching in socio-technical environments. In T. J. V. Weert & R. K. Munro (Eds.), Informatics and the digital society: Social, ethical and cognitive issues (Proceedings of Seciii 2002, pp. 59–72). Kluwer: Boston.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T. (2009). Systems design with the sociotechnical walkthrough. In A. Whitworth & B. de Moore (Eds.), Handbook of research on socio-technical design and social networking systems (pp. 336–351). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2005). The metamorphoses of workflow projects in their early stages. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14(5), 399–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Kunau, G., & Loser, K. (2004). A modeling method for the development of groupware applications as socio-technical systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(2), 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T., Kunau, G., & Loser, K.-U. (2007). Socio-technical self-description as a means for projects of introducing computer supported cooperation. In Electronically published;40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICCS 2007): Available at http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/diglib.htm

  • Hess, J., Randall, D., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2013). Involving users in the wild—Participatory product development in and with online communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(5), 570–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7(3), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, H., Paterno, F., & Wulf, V. (Eds.). (2006). End user development. Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morch, A. (1997). Three levels of end-user tailoring: Customization, integration, and extension. In M. Kyng & L. Mathiassen (Eds.), Computers and design in context (pp. 51–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E. (2000). A socio-technical approach to systems design. Requirements Engineering, 5(2), 125–133, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. A. (1993). A small matter of programming. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (Eds.). (1986). User-centered system design, new perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. (2005) What is Web 2.0 – Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Available at http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html

  • Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines—An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca: ILR Press/Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, P. P. (2000). Our present: Postmodern? In H. Andersen & L. B. Kaspersen (Eds.), Classical and modern social theory (pp. 412–431). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2009). The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H., & Webber, M. M. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 135–144). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (1997). Of maps and scripts. The status of formal constructs in cooperative work. Information and Software Technology, 6(41), 319–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (Vol. II, pp. 37–54). San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portofolio, Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge—Improving decisions about health, wealth, an happiness. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L. (1981). The sociotechnical perspective: The evolution of sociotechnical systems as a conceptual framework and as an action research program. In A. H. VanDe Ven & W. F. Joyce (Eds.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V., Rohde, M., Pipek, V., & Stevens, G. (2011). Engaging with practices: Design case studies as a research framework in CSCW. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on computer supported cooperative work, Hangzhou, China (pp. 505–512). Hangzhou: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Y., & Fischer, G. (2007) Converging on a “science of design” through the synthesis of design methodologies (Chi’2007 workshop). Available at http://swiki.cs.colorado.edu:3232/CHI07Design/3

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the members of the Center for LifeLong Learning & Design at the University of Colorado (specifically Hal Eden, the main developer of the EDC, and Stefan Carmien who developed MAPS as part of his PhD) and the team of the Information and Technology Management group at the University of Bochum, Germany, who have made major contributions to the ideas described in this paper.

The research at CU Boulder was supported in part by:

  • Grants from the National Science Foundation, including (a) IIS-0613638 A Meta-Design Framework for Participative Software Systems, (b) IIS-0709304 A New Generation Wiki for Supporting a Research Community in ‘Creativity and IT, and (c) IIS-0843720 Increasing Participation and Sustaining a Research Community in ‘Creativity and IT’

  • Google research award Motivating and Empowering Users to Become Active Contributors: Supporting the Learning of High-Functionality Environments

  • SAP research project Giving All Stakeholders a Voice: Understanding and Supporting the Creativity and Innovation of Communities Using and Evolving Software Products

The research at the University of Bochum was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, including:

  • SPIW: Logistics agencies in the web – 01 HT 0143

  • Service4home: Coordination of services for elderly people by micro-systems technology input devices – 01 FC08008

The first author was supported in part for this work by a fellowship of the Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg (an Institute for Advanced Study) in Delmenhorst, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerhard Fischer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fischer, G., Herrmann, T. (2015). Meta-design: Transforming and Enriching the Design and Use of Socio-technical Systems. In: Wulf, V., Schmidt, K., Randall, D. (eds) Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real-World. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6719-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6720-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics