Elastic Workplace Design
With the consumerization of IT, rugged, process-centric enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are increasingly challenged by small fit-to-purpose productivity applications that are designed for very specific use cases. ERP content, which used to reside in transactional database applications, suddenly becomes accessible on mobile devices and blends into personal knowledge management applications. This increasing pervasiveness of information systems in work and private contexts demands, we argue, more situational adaptability of functionality and content.
KeywordsShipping Volatility Editing Alan Buono
- Arafat, S. (2007). Foundations research in information retrieval inspired by quantum theory. Ph.D. thesis. University of Glasgow. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/181/01/2007arafatphd.pdf. Accessed 2 Apr 2012.
- Ardito, C., Costabile, M. F., Desolda, G., Latzina, M., & Matera, M. (2015a). Making mashups actionable through elastic design principles. In P. Díaz, V. Pipek, C. Ardito, C. Jensen, I. Aedo, & A. Boden (Eds.), End-user development (pp. 236–241). Springer International Publishing.cf. http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319184241
- Ardito, C., Costabile, M. F., Desolda, G., Latzina, M., & Matera, M. (2015b). Hands-on actionable mashups. In P. Díaz, V. Pipek, C. Ardito, C. Jensen, I. Aedo, & A. Boden (Eds.), End-User Development (pp. 295–298). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Ardito, C., Costabile, M. F., Matera, M., Piccinno, A., Desolda, G., & Picozzi, M. (2012). Composition of situational interactive spaces by end users. In NordiCHI 2012: Proceedings of the 7th nordic conference on human-computer interaction: Making sense through design, October 14th–17th, Copenhagen, Denmark: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Ardito, C., Costabile, M. F., Lanzilotti, G. D. R., Matera, M., Piccinno, A., Picozzi, M. (2014). User-driven visual composition of service-based interactive spaces. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 25(4), 278–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.01.003.
- Bernstein, A. (2000). How can cooperative work tools support dynamic group processes? Bridging the specificity frontier. Philadelphia: CSCW, ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Cabitza, F., & Simone, C. (2015). Building socially embedded technologies: Implications about design. In V. Wulf, K. Schmidt & D. Randall (Eds.), Designing socially embedded technologies in the real-world (pp. 217–270). London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Campbell, I. (2000). The ostensive model of developing information needs. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Computer Science, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
- Cooper, A., Reimann, R., & Cronin, D. (2007). About Face 3: The essentials of interaction design. Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- De Michelis, G. (2015). Situated computing. In V. Wulf, K. Schmidt & D. Randall (Eds.), Designing socially embedded technologies in the real-world (pp. 65–77). London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Dix, A. (2007). Designing for appropriation. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group annual conference on people and computers: HCI…but not as we know it – Vol. 2 (BCS-HCI ‘07) (pp. 27–30). Swinton: British Computer Society.Google Scholar
- Dubberly, H. (2008). On modeling. Design in the age of biology: Shifting from a mechanical-object ethos to an organic-systems ethos. Interactions 15(5), 35–41. doi: 10.1145/1390085.1390092
- Fischer, G. (2009). Democratizing design: New challenges and opportunities for computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conf. on Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL’09), Vol. 1. (pp. 282–286). International Society of the Learning Sciences. Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
- Henderson, A., & Kyng, M. (1991). There’s no place like home: Continuing design in use. In J. Greenbaum, M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work – Cooperative design of computer artifacts (pp. 219–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Latzina, M. (2015). Searching in a playful manner. In P. Díaz, V. Pipek, C. Ardito, C. Jensen, I. Aedo, & A. Boden (Eds.), End-user development (pp. 279–282). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Latzina, M., & Beringer, J. (2012). Transformative user experience: Beyond packaged design. Interactions 19(2), 30–33. doi: 10.1145/2090150.2090159
- Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., & Wulf, V. (Eds.). (2006). End user development. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Perlin, K., & Meyer, J. (1999). Nested user interface components. In Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (UIST ‘99) (pp. 11–18). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Werner, H., Latzina, M., & Brade, M. (2011). Symbik – A new medium for collaborative knowledge-intensive work. In Proceedings of the international conference on education, informatics, and cybernetics (Orlando, Florida, Nov 29–Dec 2, 2011). icEIC 2011. Winter Garden, Florida: International Institute of Informatics and Systemics (IIIS). Available: http://www.iiis.org/CDs2011/CD2011IDI/ICEIC_2011/PapersPdf/EI924DD.pdf
- Wulf, V., Pipek, V., & Won, M. (2008). Component-based tailorability: Enabling highly flexible software applications. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS), 66(1), 1–22.Google Scholar