Skip to main content

Mode of Delivery and Perineal Trauma

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1196 Accesses

Abstract

Perineal trauma during childbirth is common. Although in the majority of cases perineal trauma does not have a major impact in the woman’s future pelvic floor function, severe degrees of childbirth trauma such as levator ani trauma and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) may result in significant pelvic floor dysfunction including urinary and faecal incontinence. Levator ani muscle trauma is diagnosed in one third of women who have vaginal birth. Levator trauma can lead to weakening of the pelvic floor muscles, widening of the urogenital hiatus and pelvic organ prolapse in the future. In this chapter, the biomechanics of the second stage of labour and its effects on the pelvic floor and levator ani complex are discussed along with the effects of prolonged second stage on the pelvic floor. Different modes of delivery including instrumental deliveries have a different impact on the risk of perineal trauma and levator ani complex. The effect of fetal malposition and malpresentation and multiple pregnancies on perineal trauma as well as the role of episiotomy are also discussed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vacca A. Vacuum-assisted delivery: an analysis of traction force and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;46:124–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pearse WH. Electronic recording of forceps delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1963;86:43–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V. Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:707–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. On the biomechanics of vaginal birth and common sequelae. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;11:163–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fitzpatrick M, O’Brien C, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Patterns of abnormal pudendal nerve function that are associated with postpartum fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:730–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan HQ, Kerns JM, Lin DL, Sypert D, Steward J, Hoover CR, et al. Dual simulated childbirth injury delays anatomic recovery. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;296(2):F277–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Operative vaginal delivery. ACOG practice bulletin 17. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith AR, Warrell DW. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(9):770–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kearney R, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):144–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson JN, Norwitz ER, Cohen AP, McElrath TF, Lieberman ES. Epidural analgesia and third- or fourth-degree lacerations in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(2):259–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hauck YL, Lewis L, Nathan EA, White C, Doherty DA. Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during vaginal childbirth: a Western Australian retrospective cohort study. Women Birth. 2015;28(1):16–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shek KL, Dietz HP. Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117(12):1485–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Harkin R, Fitzpatrick M, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Anal sphincter disruption at vaginal delivery: is recurrence predictable? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;109(2):149–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirayama F, Koyanagi A, Mori R, Zhang J, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Prevalence and risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: a multi-country study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;119:340–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowder JL, Burrows LJ, Krohn MA, Weber AM. Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:344.e1–e5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L, Mahmood T, Adams E, Richmond D, et al. Third and fourth degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(12):1516–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD000081.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Basu M, Mukerji S, Doumouchtsis SK. Perineal trauma in women undergoing vaginal delivery following uterine fetal demise: a case control analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:61–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Porat S, Baud D, Farine D. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries in vaginal delivery of twins: associated risk factors and comparison with singletons. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(5):769–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Department of Health. Statistical Bulletin. Maternity statistics England 2002–2003. London: HMSO; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. O’Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11):CD005455.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Patel RR, Murphy DJ. Forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice. Br Med J. 2004;328:1302–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Park JS, Robinson JN, Norwitz ER. Rotational forceps: should these procedures be abandoned? Semin Perinatol. 2003;27:112–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chinnock M, Robson S. An anonymous survey of registrar training in the use of Kjelland’s forceps in Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49(5):515–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tan KH, Sim R, Yam KL. Kielland’s forceps delivery: is it a dying art? Singapore Med J. 1992;33(4):380–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Olah KS. In praise of Kielland’s forceps. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109:492–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jain V, Guleria K, Gopalan S, Narang A. Mode of delivery in deep transverse arrest. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993;43:129–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stock SJ, Josephs K, Farquharson S, Love C, Cooper SE, Kissack C, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(5):1032–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bahl R, Van de Venne M, Macleod M, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(12):1526–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gauthaman N, Henry D, Chis Ster I, Khunda A, Doumouchtsis SK. Kielland’s forceps – does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(10):1525–32.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Krofta L, Otcenasek M, Kasikova E, Feyereisl J. Pubococcygeus puborectalis trauma after forceps delivery: evaluation of the levator ani muscle with 3D/4D ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:1175–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dietz HP, Chantarasorn V, Shek KL. Levator avulsion is a risk factor for cystocele recurrence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:76–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gardella C, Taylor M, Benedetti T, Hitti J, Critchlow C. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:896–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bhide A, Guven M, Prefumo F, Vankalayapati P, Thilaganathan B. Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20(7):541–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green top guideline no 26. Operative vaginal delivery. 3rd ed. London: RCOG; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Coats PM, Chan KK, Wilkins M, Beard RJ. A comparison between midline and mediolateral episiotomies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;87:408–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Werner CH, Schuler W, Meskendahl I. Midline episiotomy versus mediolateral episiotomy: a randomised prospective study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. In: Proceedings of 13th World Congress of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), Singapore; Book 1. 1991. p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  38. de Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HCS. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;108(4):383–7.

    Google Scholar 

  39. de Leeuw JW, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(1):104–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kudish B, Blackwell S, Mcneeley SG, Bujold E, Kruger M, Hendrix SL, Sokol R. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(3):749–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, Howarth L, Goyder K, Van de Venne M, Murphy DJ. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(13):1688–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, Goyder K, Howarth L, Strachan B. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(13):1695–702.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O'Herlihy C. Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(6):1027–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vergers-Spooren HC, de Leeuw JW. A rare complication of a vaginal breech delivery. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:306124.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Gauthaman N, Walters S, Tribe IA, Goldsmith L, Doumouchtsis SK. Shoulder dystocia and associated manoeuvres as risk factors for perineal trauma. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. DOI 10.1007/s00192-015-2863-x.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nivedita Gauthaman MBBS, MD, MRCOG .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gauthaman, N., Doumouchtsis, S.K. (2017). Mode of Delivery and Perineal Trauma. In: Doumouchtsis, S. (eds) Childbirth Trauma. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6711-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6711-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6710-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6711-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics