Skip to main content

Standardization of Audiovisual Media Accessibility

From Vision to Reality

  • Chapter
A Multimodal End-2-End Approach to Accessible Computing

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

  • 414 Accesses

Abstract

The final chapter discusses role and utility of standardization of accessibility. Section 16.2 discusses the role of accessible media in the twenty-first century, in particular what we mean by ‘media’, ‘computing’ and ‘accessibility’. Section 16.3 goes on to discuss the role of standardization in furthering media accessibility. Section 16.4 concludes with an account of the work of a focus group at ITU-T on Audio Visual Media Accessibility to produce a roadmap of actions covering legislation, regulation and standardization that can make Audio Visual (AV) media more accessible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    AD Broadcast mix is an alternative ‘ready-to-use’ mix of the audio channels including the AD. It is produced by the broadcaster.

  2. 2.

    AD Receiver mix delivers the AD as a separate audio track to the receiver. This track is mixed with the original programme audio in the receiver itself.

References

  1. Moeller, S., Joseph, A., Lau, J., & Carbo, T. (2011). Towards media and information literacy indicators. Background document of the expert meeting, 4–6 November 2010, Bangkok, Thailand. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved July 7, 2012, from http://www.ucm.es/BUCM/boletin/doc17043.pdf

  2. Looms, P. O. (2012, October). Design models for media accessibility. Journal of Designing in China. Hangzhou, PRC.

    Google Scholar 

  3. UPIAS founding statement. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/UPIAS/UPIAS.pdf

  4. UNDP. (2009). Human development report 2009 human movement: Snapshots and trends. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prensky, M. (2001, October). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. Bradford: MCB University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, C., & Bernoff, J. (2008). Groundswell: Winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Damodaran, L. (2002). Analogue to digital switchover: Human aspects of adoption (A scoping study for the Digital Television Project – CRSP456). http://www.digitaltelevision.gov.uk/pdf_documents/publications/scoping_study.pdf

  8. Carter, L. (2009). Digital Britain – Final report. http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm76/7650/7650.pdf

  9. Helsper, E. J. (2011). The emergence of a digital underclass digital policies in the UK and evidence for inclusion (Media Policy Brief 3). London: London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Media and Communications. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/

  10. Carter, L. (2010). Delivering digital inclusion. Annex 2: Who do we want to help? (pp. 4–5). London: UK Department for Business Innovation & Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cap Gemini Consulting. (2012). 6.2. The economic case for digital inclusion – Key findings (p. 62). Evaluating the work of the UK Digital Champion and Race Online 2012 – An independent review March 2012 Race Online, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  12. David, P. A., & Greenstein, S. (1990). The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. The Economics of Innovations and New Technology, 1(1/2), 3–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fomin, V., & Keil, T. (2000). Standardization: Bridging the gap between economic and social theory. In ICIS ’00 proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Information systems (pp. 206–217). Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wood, D. (2011). Mapping digital media: Technical standards in terrestrial television (Reference Series No. 9). Open Society Media Program. Open Society Foundations. http://www.soros.org/reports/mapping-digital-media-technical-standards-terrestrial-television

  15. Wikipedia. BBC iPlayer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_iPlayer

  16. Looms, P. O. (2006). Public service media: All things to all people – On all platforms, anytime? In: C. S. Nissen (Ed.), Making a difference – Public service broadcasting and the media landscape in Europe. Published in English, French, Italian and Estonian for the European Broadcasting Union by John Libbey Publishing, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Looms, P. O. (2011). Mapping digital media: Gatekeeping in digital media (Reference Series No. 8). Open Society Media Program. Open Society Foundations. http://www.soros.org/reports/mapping-digital-media-gatekeeping-digital-media

  18. ITU-T FG AVA website. http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/ava/Pages/default.aspx

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Olaf Looms .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Looms, P.O. (2015). Standardization of Audiovisual Media Accessibility. In: Biswas, P., Duarte, C., Langdon, P., Almeida, L. (eds) A Multimodal End-2-End Approach to Accessible Computing. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6708-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6708-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6707-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6708-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics