When Ideas Generate Value: How LEGO Profitably Democratized Its Relationship with Fans

Part of the Springer Series on Cultural Computing book series (SSCC)

Abstract

In a basement filled with buildings made of LEGO bricks, a young boy creates his own models. Adventures are being played out by his own imagination but on his father’s LEGO setting. When that came into his father’s eyes, he immediately starts to chastise his son for ruining the setting by creating hodgepodges of different models and playing themes. The story that a young boy created was actually the plot of The Lego Movie (2014) where an ordinary construction worker Emmet had been prophesied to save the LEGO universe from the tyrannical Lord Business. Later in the basement, the boy’s father looked at his son’s creations again and got impressed. Having realized that his son based the evil Lord Business on him, the father changes opinion and allows his son to play with his bricks however he sees them fit. The LEGO Movie, a computer-animated adventure comedy film, successfully managed to be a powerful story about the drawbacks of conformity while celebrating individuality and the creative potential of imagination. “Creative individuals are no longer viewed as iconoclasts; they are new mainstream” (Florida, Rise of the creative class — revisited: 10th anniversary edition — revised and expanded, Basic Books, New York, 2012) in the emergence of “a new economic democracy in which we all have a lead role” (Tapscott and Williams, Wikinomics, Penguin, New York, 2007). According to Florida, that creative ethos that molds the core of our identities is critical for generating creativity and commercial innovations in a “produsage-based democratic model” (Bruns, Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: from production to produsage. Digital formations, 45. Peter Lang, New York, 2008); the real driving force is the rise of human creativity as the key factor in our economy and society. Both at work and in other spheres of our lives, we value creativity more highly and cultivate it more intensely than we ever before (Florida, Rise of the creative class — revisited: 10th anniversary edition — revised and expanded, Basic Books, New York, 2012).

Keywords

Mold Radar Marketing Stake Ethos 

References

  1. Antorini YM (2007) Brand community innovation: an intrinsic case study of the adult fans of LEGO community. PhD series 35.2007. Samfundslitteratur Publishers, FrederiksberGoogle Scholar
  2. Baym N, Burnett R (2009) Amateur experts: international fan labor in Swedish independent music. Int J Cult Stud 12(5):433–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bødker K, Kensing F, Simonsen J (2004) Participatory IT design: designing for business and workplace realities. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogers M, Afuah A, Bastian B (2010) Users as innovators: a review, critique, and future research directions. J Manag 36(4):857–875Google Scholar
  5. Bolton RN, Parasuraman A, Hoefnagels A, Migchels N, Kabadayi S, Gruber T et al (2013) Understanding generation Y and their use of social media: a review and research agenda. J Serv Manag 24(3):245–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brabham DC (2008) Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: an introduction and cases. Converg Int J Res New Media Technol 14(1):75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruns A (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: from production to produsage. Digital formations, 45. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Chesbrough H (2006) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesbrough HW, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (2006) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Deuze M (2008) Corporate appropriation of participatory culture. In: Nico C, De Cleen B (eds) Participation and media production: critical reflections on content creation. Cambridge Scholars Publishers, Newcastle, pp 27–40Google Scholar
  11. Djelassi S, Decoopman I (2013) Customers participation in product development through crowdsourcing: issues and implications. Ind Mark Manag 42(5):683–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Florida R (2012) Rise of the creative class — revisited: 10th anniversary edition — revised and expanded. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartley J (2004) The ‘value chain of meaning’ and the new economy. Int J Cultur Stud 7(1):129–41CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Holbrook MB (1996) Customer value – a framework for analysis and research. Adv Consum Res 23(1):138–42Google Scholar
  15. Hopkins R (2011) What is crowdsourcing? In: Sloane P (ed) A guide to open innovation and crowdsourcing. Kogan Page Ltd., London, pp 15–21Google Scholar
  16. Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired 14(6) [online] Available at: http:// www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html. Accessed 15 July 2014
  17. Jenkins H, Ford S, Green J (2013) Spreadable media: creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Koerner BI (2006) Geeks in Toyland. Wired 14:104–109Google Scholar
  19. Lanier CD Jr, Fowler AR III (2013) Digital fandom: mediation, remediation, and demediation of fan practices. In: Belk RW, Llamas R (eds) The Routledge companion to digital consumption. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Lauwaert M (2009) The place of play: toys and digital cultures. Amsterdam University Press, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee SM, Olsen DL, Trimi S (2012) Co-innovation: convergenomics, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values. Manag Decis 50(5):817–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. LEGO official Facebook page [online] Available at: https://www.facebook.com/LEGOGROUP. Accessed 27 July 2014
  23. LEGO Annual Report (2000, 2003, 2005) [online] Available at: http://www.lego.com/en-us/aboutus/lego-group/annual-report. Accessed 15 July 2014
  24. Papert S (1991) Situating constructionism In: Papert S, Harel I (eds) Constructionism. Research reports and essays, 1985–1990 by the Epistemology & Learning Research Group. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  25. Plé L, Lecoq X, Angot J (2010) Customer-integrated business models: a theoretical framework. Management 13(4):226–265Google Scholar
  26. Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2004) The future of competition: co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  27. Ritzer G (2004) The McDonaldization of society, 4th edn. Pine Forge Press, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  28. Schäfer MT (2011) Bastard culture! How user participation transforms cultural production. Amsterdam University Press, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Simonsen J, Robertson T (eds) (2013) Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Tapscott D, Anthony DW (2007) Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Tapscott D, Williams A (2006) Wikinomics. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Terranova T (2000) Free labor: producing culture in the digital economy. Social Text 18(2):33–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. The Lego Movie (2014) Directors: Lord Phil and Miller Christopher, WarnerGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomke S, von Hippel E (2002) Customers as innovators: a new way to create value. Harv Bus Rev 80(4):74–80Google Scholar
  35. von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  36. Weiers G (2014) Innovation through cooperation: the emergence of an idea economy. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zwick D et al (2008) Putting consumers to work: ‘co-creation’ and new marketing govern-mentality. J Consum Cult 8(2):163–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aesthetics and CommunicationAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations