Abstract
There has been a growing awareness of environmental effects among human. More epidemiologic studies have been triggered toward investigating exposure effects of chemical, social or physical factors in relation to the common or complex diseases, such as heart disease, cancer, and diabetes afterward. Following recent advances in genomics and risk assessment, environmental epidemiologic studies are incorporating gene-environment interactions and epigenetic changes to explore the multidisciplinary nature of individual. The challenges for human population work in this field include the complexity of exposure biology and the small effects that are easily disturbed. Several strategies have been developed with an attempt to resolve these challenges, such as the development of exposome, the two-stage designs and Mendelian randomization. In this chapter, the conventional study design features, including particular strengths and limitations, have been summarized.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal A et al (2010) The effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on offspring outcomes. Prev Med 50(1–2):13–18
Albert PS et al (2001) Limitations of the case-only design for identifying gene-environment interactions. Am J Epidemiol 154(8):687–693
Amin-Zaki L et al (1974) Intra-uterine methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Pediatrics 54(5):587–595
Angerer J, Ewers U, Wilhelm M (2007) Human biomonitoring: state of the art. Int J Hyg Environ Health 210(3–4):201–228
Breslow NE, Lubin JH, Marek P, Langholtz B (1983) Multiplicative models and cohort analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 78:1–12
Bureau A et al (2008) Estimating interaction between genetic and environmental risk factors: efficiency of sampling designs within a cohort. Epidemiology 19(1):83–93
Carroll RJ, Crainiceanu C, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA (2006) Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
CHA (2000) Children’s Health Act 2000 Public Law 106–310 (codified at 42 USC 201)
Chatterjee BB et al (1969) The location of personal sampler filter heads. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 30(6):643–645
Chavance M, Dellatolas G, Lellouch J (1992) Correlated nondifferential misclassifications of disease and exposure: application to a cross-sectional study of the relation between handedness and immune disorders. Int J Epidemiol 21(3):537–546
Collins FS, Manolio TA (2007) Merging and emerging cohorts: necessary but not sufficient. Nature 445(7125):259
Cui Y et al (2001) Nanowire nanosensors for highly sensitive and selective detection of biological and chemical species. Science 293(5533):1289–1292
Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S (2003) ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol 32(1):1–22
Dosemeci M, Wacholder S, Lubin JH (1990) Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value? Am J Epidemiol 132(4):746–748
ES G (1991) Re: “Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value?” (Letter). Am J Epidemiol 134(4):440-1
Feng S, Jacobsen SE, Reik W (2010) Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development. Science 330(6004):622–627
Fleming JL, Huang TH, Toland AE (2008) The role of parental and grandparental epigenetic alterations in familial cancer risk. Cancer Res 68(22):9116–9121
Gauderman WJ (2002) Sample size requirements for matched case-control studies of gene-environment interaction. Stat Med 21(1):35–50
Gluckman PD, Hanson MA (2004) Developmental origins of disease paradigm: a mechanistic and evolutionary perspective. Pediatr Res 56(3):311–317
Gray R, Wheatley K (1991) How to avoid bias when comparing bone marrow transplantation with chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 7(Suppl 3):9–12
Hemstreet GP 3rd et al (2001) Biomarker risk assessment and bladder cancer detection in a cohort exposed to benzidine. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(6):427–436
Hernan MA et al (2008) Observational studies analyzed like randomized experiments: an application to postmenopausal hormone therapy and coronary heart disease. Epidemiology 19(6):766–779
Hunt JR, White E (1998) Retaining and tracking cohort study members. Epidemiol Rev 20(1):57–70
Hunter DJ (2005) Gene-environment interactions in human diseases. Nat Rev Genet 6(4):287–298
Jacob J, Seidel A (2002) Biomonitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in human urine. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 778(1–2):31–47
Jager KJ et al (2008) Confounding: what it is and how to deal with it. Kidney Int 73(3):256–260
Jirtle RL, Skinner MK (2007) Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nat Rev Genet 8(4):253–262
Last JM (2001) A dictionary of epidemiology, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Koepsell TD, Weiss NS (2003) Epidemiologic methods: studying the occurrence of illness. Oxford University Press, New York
Kristensen P (1992) Bias from nondifferential but dependent misclassification of exposure and outcome. Epidemiology 3(3):210–215
Kupper LL, McMichael AJ, Spirtas R (1975) A hybrid epidemiologic study design useful in estimating relative risk. J Am Stat Assoc 70:524–528
Last J, Spasoff R, Harris S (2001) A dictionary of epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York
Lioy PJ (1995) Measurement methods for human exposure analysis. Environ Health Perspect 103(Suppl 3):35–43
Little RR, Sacks DB (2009) HbA1c: how do we measure it and what does it mean? Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 16(2):113–118
Liu CY et al (2012) Design and analysis issues in gene and environment studies. Environ Health 11:93
Lubin JH, Gail MH (1984) Biased selection of controls for case-control analyses of cohort studies. Biometrics 40(1):63–75
Ludwig JA, Weinstein JN (2005) Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection. Nat Rev Cancer 5(11):845–856
Maclure M (1991) The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol 133(2):144–153
Manolio TA (2009) Cohort studies and the genetics of complex disease. Nat Genet 41(1):5–6
Manolio TA, Bailey-Wilson JE, Collins FS (2006) Genes, environment and the value of prospective cohort studies. Nat Rev Genet 7(10):812–820
Marsh DO et al (1980) Fetal methylmercury poisoning: clinical and toxicological data on 29 cases. Ann Neurol 7(4):348–353
Medlin J (2001) Sister study hopes to answer breast cancer questions. Environ Health Perspect 109(8):A368–A369
Michels KB (2010) The promises and challenges of epigenetic epidemiology. Exp Gerontol 45(4):297–301
Miettinen O (1982) Design options in epidemiologic research. An update. Scand J Work Environ Health 8(Suppl 1):7–14
Montgomery SM, Ekbom A (2002) Smoking during pregnancy and diabetes mellitus in a British longitudinal birth cohort. BMJ 324(7328):26–27
Morgenstern H, Thomas D (1993) Principles of study design in environmental epidemiology. Environ Health Perspect 101(Suppl 4):23–38
NRC (1987) Biological markers in environmental health research. Environ Health Perspect 74:3–9
Perera FP, Weinstein IB (1982) Molecular epidemiology and carcinogen-DNA adduct detection: new approaches to studies of human cancer causation. J Chron Dis 35(7):581–600
Prentice RL, Pyke R (1979) Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies. Biometrika 66:403–411
Rappaport SM (2011) Implications of the exposome for exposure science. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 21(1):5–9
Rodier PM (2004) Environmental causes of central nervous system maldevelopment. Pediatrics 113(4 Suppl):1076–1083
Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998a) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven Press, Philadelphia
Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998b) Case-control studies. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S (eds) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 93–114
Rothman N, Stewart WF, Schulte PA (1995) Incorporating biomarkers into cancer epidemiology: a matrix of biomarker and study design categories. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4(4):301–311
Sasaki H, Matsui Y (2008) Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell development: reprogramming and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 9(2):129–140
Talens RP et al (2010) Variation, patterns, and temporal stability of DNA methylation: considerations for epigenetic epidemiology. FASEB J 24(9):3135–3144
Thomas D (2010) Gene – environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches. Nat Rev Genet 11(4):259–272
Tilson HA, Jacobson JL, Rogan WJ (1990) Polychlorinated biphenyls and the developing nervous system: cross-species comparisons. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12(3):239–248
Tseng WP (1977) Effects and dose – response relationships of skin cancer and blackfoot disease with arsenic. Environ Health Perspect 19:109–119
Tseng WP et al (1968) Prevalence of skin cancer in an endemic area of chronic arsenicism in Taiwan. J Natl Cancer Inst 40(3):453–463
van Rein N et al (2014) Suspected survivor bias in case-control studies: stratify on survival time and use a negative control. J Clin Epidemiol 67(2):232–235
Wacholder S et al (1992) Selection of controls in case-control studies. II. Types of controls. Am J Epidemiol 135(9):1029–1041
Waterland RA, Michels KB (2007) Epigenetic epidemiology of the developmental origins hypothesis. Annu Rev Nutr 27:363–388
Weinberg CR, Umbach DM, Greenland S (1994) When will nondifferential misclassification of an exposure preserve the direction of a trend? Am J Epidemiol 140(6):565–571
Weinberg CR et al (2007) Using risk-based sampling to enrich cohorts for endpoints, genes, and exposures. Am J Epidemiol 166(4):447–455
Weis BK et al (2005) Personalized exposure assessment: promising approaches for human environmental health research. Environ Health Perspect 113(7):840–848
White JE (1982) A two stage design for the study of the relationship between a rare exposure and a rare disease. Am J Epidemiol 115(1):119–128
Whittemore AS (1981) The efficiency of synthetic retrospective studies. Biom J 23:73–78
Whittemore AS, McMillan A (1982) Analyzing occupational cohort data: application to U.S. uranium miners. In: Prentice RL, Whittemore AS (eds) Environmental epidemiology: risk assessment. SIAM, Philadelphia, pp 65–81
Wiencke JK et al (1991) Individual susceptibility to induced chromosome damage and its implications for detecting genotoxic exposures in human populations. Cancer Res 51(19):5266–5269
Willett WC et al (2007) Merging and emerging cohorts: not worth the wait. Nature 445(7125):257–258
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, CY. (2015). Epidemiology of Environmental Health. In: Su, L., Chiang, Tc. (eds) Environmental Epigenetics. Molecular and Integrative Toxicology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6678-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6678-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6677-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6678-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)