Long Term Survival of Total Knee Arthroplasty. Lessons Learn from the Clinical Outcome of Old Designs. Second Generation of Implants and the Total Condylar TKA

Abstract

Following the clinical application of the first generation of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), the evolution of TKA was rapid and impressive. Better understanding of knee kinematics, improvements in surgical techniques and manufacturing of durable materials and designs led to substantial developments in the field of TKA. Two main trends were to become apparent – the functional and anatomical technical approaches. The initial designs of both approaches showed satisfactory clinical outcomes and lower complication rates, although problems with aseptic loosening, instability and patellofemoral pain were still encountered. The introduction of total condylar and rotating platform implants was a crucial step, since all modern prostheses have been influenced by these two knee types.

Keywords

Fatigue Arthritis Chrome Cobalt Mold 

References

  1. 1.
    Smith PN, Refshauge KM, Scarvell JM. Development of the concepts of knee kinematics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1895–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dennis DA, Heekin RD, Clark CR, Murphy JA, O’Dell TL, Dwyer KA. Effect of implant design on knee flexion. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:429–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yamamoto S. Total knee replacement with the Kodama-Yamamoto knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop. 1979;145:60–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Waugh TR, Smith RC, Orofino CF, Anzel SM. Total knee replacement: operative technic and preliminary results. Clin Orthop. 1973;94:196–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Townley CO. The classic: articular-plate replacement arthroplasty for the knee joint.1964. Clin Orthop. 2005;440:9–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seedhom BB, Longton EB, Dowson D, Wright V. Biomechanics background in the design of a total replacement knee prosthesis. Acta Orthop Belg. 1973;39:164–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ranawat CS, Shine JJ. Duo-condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1973;94:185–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman MA, Swanson SA, Todd RC. Total replacement of the knee using the Freeman-Swanson knee prosthesis. 1973. Clin Orthop. 2003;416:4–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamamoto S, Nakata S, Kondoh Y. A follow-up study of an uncemented knee replacement. The results of 312 knees using the Kodama-Yamamoto prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71B:505–8.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Evanski PM, Waugh TR, Orofino CF, Anzel SH. UCI knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 1976;120:33–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamilton LR. UCI total knee replacement. A follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64A:740–4.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chalidis BE, Sachinis NP, Papadopoulos P, Petsatodis E, Christodoulou AG, Petsatodis G. Long-term results of posterior-cruciate-retaining Genesis I total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16:726–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhandari M, Pascale W, Sprague S, Pascale V. The Genesis II in primary total knee replacement: a systematic literature review of clinical outcomes. Knee. 2012;19:8–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Townley CO. The anatomic total knee resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1985;192:82–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ranawat CS, Insall J, Shine J. Duo-condylar knee arthroplasty: hospital for special surgery design. Clin Orthop. 1976;120:76–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arthur CH, Wood AM, Keenan AC, Clayton RA, Walmsley P, Brenkel I. Ten-year results of the Press Fit Condylar Sigma total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95B:177–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patil SS, Branovacki G, Martin MR, Pulido PA, Levy YD, Colwell Jr CW. 14-year median follow-up using the press-fit condylar sigma design for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1286–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hanusch B, Lou TN, Warriner G, Hui A, Gregg P. Functional outcome of PFC Sigma fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2010;34:349–54.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ash HE, Burgess IC, Unsworth A. Long-term results for Kinemax and Kinematic knee bearings on a six-station knee wear simulator. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2000;214:437–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pradhan NR, Gambhir A, Porter ML. Survivorship analysis of 3234 primary knee arthroplasties implanted over a 26-year period: a study of eight different implant designs. Knee. 2006;13:7–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trieb K, Schmid M, Stulnig T, Huber W, Wanivenhaus A. Long-term outcome of total knee replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75:163–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rohrbach M, Lüem M, Ochsner PE. Patient and surgery related factors associated with fatigue type polyethylene wear on 49 PCA and DURACON retrievals at autopsy and revision. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goldberg VM, Henderson BT. The Freeman-Swanson ICLH total knee arthroplasty. Complications and problems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62A:1338–44.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Herberts P, Andersson GB. Freeman-Swanson arthroplasty of the knee in rheumatoid arthritis: a 2–7 years experience. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53:641–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Freeman MA, Samuelson KM, Levack B, de Alencar PG. Knee arthroplasty at the London Hospital. 1975–1984. Clin Orthop. 1986;205:12–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:10–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:18–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ma HM, Lu YC, Ho FY, Huang CH. Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:580–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Buechel Sr FF, Buechel Jr FF, Pappas MJ, D’Alessio J. Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:41–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Polyzoides AJ, Dendrinos GK, Tsakonas H. The Rotaglide total knee arthroplasty. Prosthesis design and early results. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:453–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopaedic Department, Center of Biomedical Sciences (CERETETH)University of ThessaliaLarissaHellenic Republic
  2. 2.Orthopaedic Department, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Center of Biomedical Sciences (CERETETH)University of Thessalia, University General Hospital of LarissaLarissaHellenic Republic

Personalised recommendations