Skip to main content

Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. Basic Science, Management and Outcome

  • Chapter
  • 1460 Accesses

Abstract

Numbers of primary elective total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are steadily increasing and so is the number of revisions. The most common complications after primary TKA are pneumonia, pulmonary embolism and wound or periprosthetic joint infection [1] (Fig. 22.1). Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most serious complications of TKA and may be the most common cause of early failure and revision [2, 3]. In Britain, it is estimated that 25 % of TKA revisions are due to infection [4]. The rate of periprosthetic infection varies across different studies. An average rate of 1 % is reported, although there are studies which present higher rates in primary (0.5–2 %) and revision surgery (2–5 %) [3]. Lower rates (0.31 %) are also reported from specialized centers with ultraclean operating theatres [5–7]. Infection after TKA leads to an increased risk of patient morbidity and mortality and to a higher cost for treatment. It is estimated that the annual cost of periprosthetic joint infection revisions exceeds $566 million in the United States and is growing [8]. The average cost of in hospital care is estimated to be double in SSI compared to non SSI patients [5]. The higher cost is related to extended hospital stays, frequent readmissions, prolonged use of antibiotics and higher postoperative rehabilitation periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bozic KJ, Grosso LM, Lin Z, Parzynski CS, Suter LG, Krumholz HM, Lieberman JR, Berry DJ, Bucholz R, Han L, Rapp MT, Bernheim S, Drye EE. Variation in hospital-level risk-standardized complication rates following elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96A:640–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Le DH, Goodman SB, Maloney WJ, Huddleston JI. Current modes of failure in TKA: infection, instability, and stiffness predominate. Clin Orthop. 2014;472:2197–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Springer BD, Scuderi GR. Evaluation and management of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2013;62:349–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vanhegan IS, Morgan-Jones R, Barrett DS, Haddad FS. Developing a strategy to treat established infection in total knee replacement: a review of the latest evidence and clinical practice. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2012;94B:875–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Poultsides LA, Ma Y, Della Valle AG, Chiu YL, Sculco TP, Memtsoudis SG. In-hospital surgical site infections after primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Incidence and risk factors. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:385–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, Schmier JK, Parvizi J. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8S):61–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Poultsides LA, Liaropoulos LL, Malizos KN. The socioeconomic impact of musculoskeletal infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:e13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhaveen H, Kapadia BH, McElroy MJ, Issa K, Johnson AJ, Bozic KJ, Mont MA. The economic impact of periprosthetic infections following total knee arthroplasty at a specialized tertiary-care center. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:929–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen J, Cui Y, Li X, Miao X, Wen Z, Xue Y, Tian J. Risk factors for deep infection after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133:675–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Simmons TD, Stern SH. Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg. 1996;9:99–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parkinson RW, Kay PR, Rawal A. A case for one-stage revision in infected total knee arthroplasty? Knee. 2011;18:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bjerke-Kroll BT, Christ AB, McLawhorn AS, Sculco PK, Jules-Elysée KM, Sculco TP. Periprosthetic joint infections treated with two-stage revision over 14 years: an evolving microbiology profile. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:877–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garvin KL, Cordero GX. Infected total knee arthroplasty: diagnosis and treatment. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:305–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burnett RS, Kelly MA, Hanssen AD, Barrack RL. Technique and timing of two-stage exchange for infection in TKA. Clin Orthop. 2007;464:164–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moyad TF, Thornhill T, Estok D. Evaluation and management of the infected total hip and knee. Orthopedics. 2008;31:581–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mihalko WM, Manaswi A, Cui Q, Parvizi J, Schmalzried TP, Saleh KJ. Diagnosis and treatment of the infected primary total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:327–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leone JM, Hanssen AD. Management of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87A:2335–48.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Munjal S, Phillips MJ, Krackow KA. Revision total knee arthroplasty: planning, controversies, and management infection. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:367–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McPherson EL, Woodson C, Holtom P, Roidis N, Shufelt C, Patzakis M. Periprosthetic total hip infection. Outcomes using a staging system. Clin Orthop. 2002;403:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parvizi J. International consensus on periprosthetic joint infection: what was discussed and decided. Am J Orthop. 2013;42:542–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Francolini I, Donelli G. Prevention and control of biofilm-based medical device related infections. Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010;59:227–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. Biofilm in implant infections: its production and regulation. Int J Artif Organs. 2005;28:1062–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalore NV, Gioe TJ, Singh JA. Diagnosis and management of infected total knee arthroplasty. Open Orthop J. 2011;5:86–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Windsor RE. Management of total knee arthroplasty infection. Orthop Clin N Am. 1999;22:531–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chung JY, Ha CW, Park YB, Song YJ, Yu KS. Arthroscopic debridement for acutely infected prosthetic knee: any role for infection control and prosthesis salvage? Arthroscopy. 2014;30:599–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jenny JY, Barbe B, Gaudias J, Boeri C, Argenson JN. High infection control rate and function after routine one-stage exchange for chronically infected TKA. Clin Orthop. 2013;471:238–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Göksan SB, Freeman MA. One-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1992;74B:78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Buechel FF, Femino FR, D’Alessio J. Primary exchange revision arthroplasty for infected total knee replacement: a long-term study. Am J Orthop. 2004;33:190–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Von Foerster G, Kluber D, Kabler U. Mid-to long-term results after treatment of 118 cases of periprosthetic infections after knee joint replacement using one-stage exchange surgery. Orthopade. 1991;20:244–52.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bauer T, Piriou P, Lhotellier L, Leclerc P, Mamoudy P, Lortat-Jacob A. Results of reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. 107 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2006;92:692–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lu H, Kou B, Lin J. One-stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. Chin J Surg. 1997;35:456–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Scott IR, Stockley I, Getty CJ. Exchange arthroplasty for infected knee replacements: a new two-stage method. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1993;75B:28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cuckler JM. The infected total knee: management options. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(4S):33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sherrell JC, Fehring TK, Odum S, Hansen E, Zmistowski B, Dennos A. Periprosthetic Infection Consortium. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award. Fate of two-stage reimplantation after failed irrigation and débridement for periprosthetic knee infection. Clin Orthop. 2011;469:18–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Westrich GH, Walcott-Sapp S, Bornstein LJ, Bostrom MP, Windsor RE, Brause BD. Modern treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty with a 2-stage reimplantation protocol. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:1015–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tigani D, Trisolino G, Fosco M, Ben Ayad R, Costigliola P. Two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection: influence of host health status and infecting microorganism. Knee. 2013;20:9–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ocguder A, Firat A, Tecimel O, Solak S, Bozkurt M. Two-stage total infected knee arthroplasty treatment with articulating cement spacer. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:719–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mahmud T, Lyons MC, Naudie DD, Macdonald SJ, McCalden RW. Assessing the gold standard: a review of 253 two-stage revisions for infected TKA. Clin Orthop. 2012;470:2730–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65A:1087–98.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kuzyk PR, Dhotar HS, Sternheim A, Gross AE, Safir O, Backstein D. Two-stage revision arthroplasty for management of chronic periprosthetic hip and knee infection: techniques, controversies, and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:153–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Thabe H, Schill S. Two-stage reimplantation with an application spacer and combined with delivery of antibiotics in the management of prosthetic joint infection. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007;19:78–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Goldman RT, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 1996;331:118–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Haleem AA, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD. Mid-term to long-term follow-up of two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2004;428:35–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kösters K, van Crevel R, Sturm PD, Willem Schreurs B, de Waal Malefijt MC, van Kampen A, Kullberg BJ. Treatment of knee prosthesis infections: evaluation of 15 patients over a 5-year period. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1249–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Romano CL, Gala L, Logoluso N, Romanò D, Drago L. Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:2445–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pivec R, Naziri Q, Issa K, Banerjee S, Mont MA. Systematic review comparing static and articulating spacers used for revision of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:553–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Shaikh AA, Ha CW, Park YG, Park YB. Two-stage approach to primary TKA in infected arthritic knees using intraoperatively molded articulating cement spacers. Clin Orthop. 2014;472:2201–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Guild GN, Wu B, Scuderi GR. Articulating vs. static antibiotic impregnated spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. A systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:558–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop. 1989;248:13–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wilde AH, Ruth JT. Two-stage reimplantation in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988;236:23–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Booth RE, Lotke PA. The results of spacer block technique in revision of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1989;248:57–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Teeny SM, Dorr L, Murata G, Conaty P. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5:35–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wilson MG, Kelley K, Thornhill TS. Infection as a complication of total knee-replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72A:878–83.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Masri BA, Kendall RW, Duncan CP, Beauchamp CP, McGraw RW, Bora B. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty using a functional antibiotic-loaded spacer in the treatment of the infected knee replacement: the Vancouver experience. Semin Arthroplasty. 1994;5:122–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hirakawa K, Stulberg BN, Wilde AH, Bauer TW, Secic M. Results of 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:22–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Fehring TK, Odum S, Calton TF, Mason JB. Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat award. Clin Orthop. 2000;380:9–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Durbhakula SM, Czajka J, Fuchs MD, Uhl RL. Antibiotic-loaded articulating cement spacer in the 2-stage exchange of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:768–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hofmann AA, Kane KR, Tkach TK, Plaster RL, Camargo MP. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulating spacer. Clin Orthop. 1995;321:45–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hart WJ, Jones RS. Two-stage revision of infected total knee replacements using articulating cement spacers and short- term antibiotic therapy. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2006;88B:1011–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kurd M, Ghanem E, Steinbrecher J, Parvizi J. Two-stage exchange knee arthroplasty. Does resistance of the infecting organism influence the outcome? Clin Orthop. 2010;468:2060–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Maheshwari AV, Gioe TJ, Kalore NV, Cheng EY. Reinfection after prior staged reimplantation for septic total knee arthroplasty: is salvage still possible? J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(6S):92–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mortazavi SM, Schwartzenberger J, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Revision total knee arthroplasty infection: incidence and predictors. Clin Orthop. 2010;468:2052–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theofilos Karachalios MD, DSc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karachalios, T., Komnos, G. (2015). Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. Basic Science, Management and Outcome. In: Karachalios, T. (eds) Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6660-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6660-3_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6659-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6660-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics