Skip to main content

Long Term Clinical Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Effect Posterior Cruciate Retaining Design

  • Chapter
Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has provided high success rates (90 %), with many studies reporting survival rates over 95 % after 10 or more years [1–10]. As technology has evolved several different TKA designs, such as the PCL retaining TKA (CR TKA) the posterior stabilized TKA (PS TKA), and the anterior stabilized TKA (AS TKA or ultra-congruent TKA), have been utilized. There is still debate among surgeons over which knee arthroplasty design should be used for primary TKA. In order to further improve the procedure, debate has arisen regarding sources of failure in TKA, including thorough evaluation of the function and role of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:980–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994;309:136–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM, Berend ME. Long-term follow-up of posterior-cruciate-retaining TKR in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop. 2004;428:146–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bozic KJ, Kinder J, Meneghini RM, Zurakowski D, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop. 2005;435:277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dixon MC, Brown RR, Parsch D, Scott RD. Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament: a study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87A:598–603.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES. Ten-year survival and clinical results of constrained components in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:803–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourne RB, Laskin RS, Guerin JS. Ten-year results of the first 100 Genesis II total knee replacement procedures. Orthopedics. 2007;30:83–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Attar F, Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Gregg PJ. Survivorship analysis at 15 years of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:344–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW. The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1328–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mouttet M, Louis L, Sourdet V. The EUROP total knee prosthesis: a ten-year follow-up study of a posterior cruciate-retaining design. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97:639–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grood ES, Stowers SF, Noyes FR. Limits of movement in the human knee, effect of sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70A:88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA. A novel approach to knee kinematics. Am J Orthop. 2001;30:287–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mihalko WM, Krackow KA. Posterior cruciate ligament effects on the flexion space in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1999;360:243–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mihalko WM, Creek AT, Komatsu DE. Mechanoreceptors found in a posterior cruciate ligament from a well-functioning Total Knee Arthroplasty retrieval. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajgopal A, Vasdev A, Dahiya V, Tyagi V. Evaluation of the posterior cruciate ligament in long standing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77:497–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Albert A, Feoli F. Are lesions of the posterior cruciate ligament predictable before knee arthroplasty? A histological study of 434 ligaments in osteoarthritic knees. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;74:652–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sherif SM, Matthew V, Dipane BA, Edward J. McPherson MD. The fate of the PCL in cruciate retaining TKA A critical review of surgical technique. Joint Implant Surg Res Found Reconstr Rev. 2013:3(4).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85A:259–65.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ritter MA, Worland R, Saliski J, Helphenstine JV, Edmondson KL, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Flat-on-flat, nonconstrained, compression molded polyethylene total knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 1995;321:79–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Malkani AL, Rand JA, Bryan RS, Wallrichs SL. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis. A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77A:423–31.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weir DJ, Moran CG, Pinder IM. Kinematic condylar total knee arthroplasty. 14-year survivorship analysis of 208 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78B:907–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abernethy PJ, Robinson CM, Fowler RM. Fracture of the metal tibial tray after kinematic total knee replacement. A common cause of early aseptic failure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78B:220–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Buehler KO, Venn-Watson E, D’Lima DD, Colwell Jr CW. The press-fit condylar total knee system: 8- to 10-year results with a posterior cruciate-retaining design. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:698–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Emerson Jr RH, Higgins LL, Head WC. The AGC total knee prosthesis at average 11 years. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:418–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Loon CJ, Wisse MA, de Waal Malefijt MC, Jansen RH, Veth RP. The kinematic total knee arthroplasty. A 10- to 15- year follow-up and survival analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:48–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gill GS, Joshi AB. Long-term results of kinematic condylar knee replacement. An analysis of 404 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:355–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sextro GS, Berry DJ, Rand JA. Total knee arthroplasty using cruciate-retaining kinematic condylar prosthesis. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term followup. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:18–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:10–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Barden RM, Sheinkop MB, Jacobs JJ, Galante JO. Long-term follow-up of the Miller-Galante total knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:58–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Laskin RS. The Genesis total knee prosthesis: a 10-year followup study. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:95–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen AL, Mujtaba M, Zuckerman JD, Jeong GK, Joseph TN, Wright K, et al. Mid-term clinical and radiographic results with the genesis I total knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:1055–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ritter MA, Berend ME, Meding JB, Keating EM, Faris PM, Crites BM. Long-term follow-up of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:51–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fetzer GB, Callaghan JJ, Templeton JE, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Kelley SS. Posterior cruciate-retaining modular total knee arthroplasty: a 9- to 12-year follow-up investigation. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:961–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Worland RL, Johnson GV, Alemparte J, et al. Ten to fourteen year survival and functional analysis of the AGC total knee replacement system. Knee. 2002;9:133–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ma HM, Lu YC, Ho FY, Huan CH. Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:580–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vessely MB, Whaley AL, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Berry DJ. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop. 2006;452:28–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rodricks DJ, Patil S, Pulido P, Colwell Jr CW. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow- up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89A:89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Barrington JW, Sah A, Malchau H, Burke DW. Contemporary cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with a pegged tibial baseplate results at a minimum of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91A:874–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ritter MA. The Anatomical Graduated Component total knee replacement: a long-term evaluation with 20-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91B:745–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schwartz AJ, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG, Jacobs JJ, Berger RA, Galante JO. Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year follow up note. Clin Orthop. 2010;468:2160–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chalidis BE, Sachinis NP, Papadopoulos P, Petsatodis E, Christodoulou AG, Petsatodis G. Long term results of posterior-cruciate-retaining Genesis I total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16:726–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Guo L, Yang L, Briard JL, Duan XJ, Wang FU. Long-term survival analysis of posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1760–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Huizinga MR, Brouwer RW, Bisschop R, van der Veen HC, van den Akker-Scheek I, van Raay JAM. Long-term follow-up of anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty. A 15- to 20-year survival analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1190–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ritter MA, Lutgring JD, Davis KE, et al. Total knee arthroplasty effectiveness in patients 55 years old and younger: osteoarthritis vs. rheumatoid arthritis. Knee. 2007;14:9–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Windsor RE, Moran MC. Survivorship of cemented knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg. 1989;71B:798–803.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Colizza W, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. The posterior stabilized knee prosthesis. Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77A:1713–20.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Emmerson KP, Moran CG, Pinder IM. Survivorship analysis f the kinematic stabilizer total knee replacement: a ten to fourteen year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78B:441–5.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Font-Rodriguez DE, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1997;345:79–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nakamura S, Kobayashi M, Ito H, Nakamura K, Ueo T, Nakamura T. The bi-surface total knee arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up study. Knee. 2010;17:274–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Ten-year follow-up of a rotating-platform, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94A:426–32.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Argenson JN, Parratte S, Ashour A, Saintmard B, Aubaniac JM. The outcome of rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty with cement at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94A:638–44.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kolisek FR, McGrath MS, Marker DR, Jessup N, Seyler TM, Mont MA, Barnes L. Posterior-stabilized versus posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Iowa Orthop J. 2009;29:23–7.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Becker MW, Insall JN, Faris PM. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty. One cruciate retaining and one cruciate substituting. Clin Orthop. 1991;271:122–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Farris A. The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. Bone Joint Res. 2012;1:64–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tanzer M, Smith K, Burnett S. Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:813–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Abdel MP, Morrey ME, Jensen MR, Morrey BF. Increased long-term survival of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior cruciate-stabilizing total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93A:2072–8.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Misra AN, Hussain MR, Fiddian NJ, Newton G. The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85B:389–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kleinbart F, Bryk E, Evangelista J, Scott WN, Vigorita VJ. Histological comparison of posterior cruciate ligaments from arthritic and age-matched knee specimens. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:726–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Swanik CB, Lephart SM, Rubash HE. Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86A:328–34.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(4):CD004803.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bercik MJ, Joshi A, Parvizi J. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:439–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Thomsen MG, Husted H, Otte KS, Holm G, Troelsen A. Do patients care about higher flexion in total knee arthroplasty? A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:127.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Padua R, Ceccarelli E, Bondi R, Campi A, Padua L. Range of motion correlates with patient perception of TKA outcome. Clin Orthop. 2007;460:174–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ritter MA, Campbell ED. Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:95–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Arbuthnot JE, Wainwright O, McNicholas MJ. Dysfunction of the posterior cruciate ligament in the total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;19:893–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Chouteau J, Lerat JL, Testa R. Sagittal laxity after posterior cruciate ligament- retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:710–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Christen B, Heester beek PV, Wymenga A. Posterior cruciate ligament balancing in total knee replacement, the quantitative relationship between tightness of the flexion gap and tibial translation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89B:1046–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Scuderi GR, Pagnano MW. Review article: the rationale for posterior cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg. 2001;9:81–8.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Stuart MJ. Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1998;356:39–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Waslewski GL, Marson BM, Benjamin JB. Early, incapacitating instability of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:763–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Migaud H, Tirveilliot F. Preservation, resection or substitution of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. In: Lemaire R, Horan F, Scott J, Villar R (eds.) Proceedings of the EFORT congress. European Instructional Course Lectures 2003;6:176–84.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lombardi AV, Berend KR. Posterior cruciate ligament retaining, posterior stabilized, and varus/valgus posterior stabilized constrained articulations in total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:419–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panagiotis Megas MD, DSc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tatani, I., Kouzelis, A., Megas, P. (2015). Long Term Clinical Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Effect Posterior Cruciate Retaining Design. In: Karachalios, T. (eds) Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6660-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6660-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6659-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6660-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics