Abstract
When reviewing the current literature available on mass retrofits, it soon becomes clear this is at best patchy in addressing the challenges the Hackbridge project sets in terms of the policy statements made by the London Borough of Sutton with respect to the vision, master plan, design and redevelopment strategy the sustainable suburb is based on. Indeed, in reviewing the literature currently available on mass retrofit proposals, it becomes all too obvious the models in question are based on the agency of architects, planners and designers and the capacity of their expert systems to align retrofits proposals with targets set to lower energy consumption and reduce levels of carbon emission. As such they lie in the first category of models criticised by Bourdic and Salat (2012) for not even meeting the robust standards of the building scientists they criticise, let alone those relating to the type of context-specific transformations they seek to usher in.
setting out the context of this transformation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deakin, M., Campbell, F., Reid, A., Orsinger, J. (2014). The Urban Context. In: The Mass Retrofitting of an Energy Efficient—Low Carbon Zone. SpringerBriefs in Energy. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6621-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6621-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6620-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6621-4
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)