Advertisement

Employees and Users as Resource Integrators in Service Innovation: A Learning Framework

  • Mervi HasuEmail author
  • Marja Toivonen
  • Tiina Tuominen
  • Eveliina Saari

Abstract

In order to exploit the emerging opportunities in the marketplace or in society, service organizations are increasingly interested in new innovation models and effective innovative practices. The involvement of users and stakeholders is an essential aspect in these models. This is also the basis of the service-dominant (S-D) logic. This framework replaces the traditional producer-centric view with an actor-to-actor perspective and considers the integration of resources an essential activity in the co-creation of value. Even though S-D logic has apparent implications for theorizing about service innovation, managerially-oriented research in this area is at an early stage. Product- and producer-centric practices and in-house R&D are still the focus of innovation studies, and they also dominate innovation efforts in organizations. The particular interest of this chapter concerns the integration of user-based and employee-driven perspectives in innovation. The two perspectives have until now developed separately, the latter having very few linkages to the S-D logic discussion. However, grassroots-level employees are in a key position as receivers of user insights and as collaborators with users. We suggest a new integrated approach by analyzing the user–employee interaction in innovation both theoretically and in two empirical cases.

Keywords

Employee User Service innovation Service-dominant (S-D) logic Resource integration Co-creation of value Effectuation Bricolage Learning Public sector 

References

  1. Alam I (2006) Removing the fuzziness from the fuzzy front-end of service innovations through customer interactions. Ind Mark Manage 35(4):468–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behaviour, vol 10. JAI Press, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  3. Axtell CM, Holman DJ, Unsworth KL, Wall TD, Waterson PE, Harrington E (2000) Shopfloor innovation: facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. J Occup Organ Psychol 73(3):265–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Adm Sci Q 50(3):329–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bessant J (2003) High-involvement innovation: building and sustaining competitive advantage through continuous change. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  6. Bindl UK, Parker SK (2011) Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 2, Selecting and developing members for the organization. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, US, pp 567–598Google Scholar
  7. Blackler F (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organ Sci 16:1021–1046Google Scholar
  8. Brandi U, Hasse C (2012) Employee-driven innovation and practice-based learning in organizational cultures. In: Høyrup S, Bonnafous-Boucher M, Hasse C, Lotz M, Møller K (eds) Employee-driven innovation: a new approach. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 127–148Google Scholar
  9. Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ Sci 2(1):40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlzon J (1978) Moments of truth: new strategies for today’s customer-driven economy. Ballinger Publishing Company, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Chesbrough H (2006) Open innovation. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Chesbrough H (2011) Opens services innovation: rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cole M, Engeström Y (1993) A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In: Salomon G (ed) Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–46Google Scholar
  14. De Jong J, den Hartog D (2010) Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity Innovation Manage 19(1):23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Jong J, Wennekers S (2008) Intrapreneurship—conceptualising entrepreneurial employee behaviour. SCALES report, H200802Google Scholar
  16. den Hertog P, Bouwman H, Gallego J, Green L, Howells J, Meiren T, Tether B (2006) Research and development needs of business related service firms. DG Internal Market and Services, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, Soete L (eds) (1988) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Edvardsson B, Gustafsson A, Kristensson P, Witell L (2010) Customer integration in service innovation. In: Gallouj F, Djellal F (eds) The handbook of innovation and services. A Multi-disciplinary perspective, Edward Elgar, pp 301–317Google Scholar
  19. Ehn P (1993) Scandinavian design: On participation and skill. Schuler D, Namioka A (ds) Participatory design: principles and practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 41–78Google Scholar
  20. Ellström P-E (2010) Practice-based innovation: a learning perspective. J Workplace Learn 22(1/2):27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Engeström Y (1987) Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  22. Engeström Y (1999) Expansive visibilization of work: an activity-theoretical perspective. Comput Support Coop Work 8:63–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Engeström Y (2001a) Making expansive decisions. an activity-theoretical study of practitioners building collaborative medical care for children. In: Allwood CM, Selart M (eds) Decision making: social and creative dimensions. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 281–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Engeström Y (2001b) Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconseptualization. J Educ Work 14(1):129–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fisher G (2012) Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioural comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice (September 2012):1019–1051Google Scholar
  26. Fuglsang L (2010) Bricolage and invisible innovation in public sector innovation. J Innovation Econ 5(1):67–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fuglsang L (2011) Bricolage as a way to make use of input from users. In: Sundbo J, Toivonen M (eds) User-based innovation in services. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 25–44Google Scholar
  28. Fuglsang L, Sundbo J (2005) The organizational innovation system: three modes. J Change Manage 5(3):329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fuglsang, L Sørensen F (2011) The balance between bricolage and innovation: management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. Serv Ind J 31(4):581–595Google Scholar
  30. Gadrey J, Gallouj F (1998) The provider-customer interface in business and professional services. Serv Ind J 18(2):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garud R, Karnøe P (2003) Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Res Policy 32:277–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gallouj F, Weinstein O (1997) Innovation in services. Res Policy 26(4–5):537–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grönroos C (2012) Conceptualising value co-creation: a journey to the 1970s and back to the future. J Mark Manage 28(13–14):1520–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grönroos C, Ojasalo J (2004) Service productivity: towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services. J Bus Res 57:414–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hasu M (2000a) Blind men and the elephant: Implementation of a new artifact as an expansive possibility. Outlines J Crit Soc Stud 2(1):5–41Google Scholar
  36. Hasu M (2000b) Constructing clinical use: an activity-theoretical perspective on implementing new technology. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 12(3):369–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hasu M (2005) In search of sensitive ethnography of change: tracing the invisible handoffs from technology developers to users. Mind, culture, and activity. Int J 12(2):90–112Google Scholar
  38. Hasu M, Engeström Y (2000) Measurement in action: an activity-theoretical perspective on producer-user interaction. Int J Hum Comput Stud 53:61–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hasu M, Saari E, Mattelmäki T (2011) Bringing the employee back. In: Integrating user-driven and employee-driven innovation in the public sector. In: Sundbo J, Toivonen M (eds) User-based innovation in services. Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp 252–278Google Scholar
  40. Helkkula A, Holopainen M (2011) Service innovation as an experience: differences between employee and user narratives. In: Sundbo J, Toivonen M (eds) User-based innovation in services. Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp 281–302Google Scholar
  41. Howells J (2004) Innovation, consumption and services: encapsulation and the combinatorial role of services. Serv Ind J 24(1):19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Høyrup S (2010) Employee-driven innovation and workplace learning: basic concepts, approaches and themes. Transfer 16(2):143–154Google Scholar
  43. Høyrup S (2012) Employee-driven innovation: a new phenomenon, concept and mode of innovation. In: Høyrup S, Bonnafous-Boucher M, Hasse C, Lotz M, Møller K (eds) Employee-driven innovation: a new approach. Palgrave Macmillan, UK, pp 3–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jensen MB, Johnson B, Lorenz E, Lundvall BÅ (2007) Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Res Policy 36(5):680–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. John-Steiner V (2000) Creative collaboration. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Kesting P, Ulhøi JP (2010) Employee-driven innovation: extending the license to foster innovation. Manag Decis 48(1):65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kim WC, Mauborgne R (1999) Strategy, value innovation, and the knowledge economy. Sloan Manag Rev 40(3):41–54Google Scholar
  48. Kline SJ, Rosenberg N (1986) An Overview of Innovation. In: Landau R, Rosenberg N (eds) The positive sum strategy. Harnessing technology for economic growth. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 275–305Google Scholar
  49. Kowalkowski C, Persson Ridell O, Röndell JG, Sörhammar D (2012) The co-creative practice of forming a value proposition. J Mark Manage 28(13–14):1553–1570Google Scholar
  50. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning,Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leont’ev AN (1978) Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  52. Lévi-Strauss C (1967) The sagave mind. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  53. Lundvall BÅ (1992) User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internalisation. In: Lundvall BÅ (ed) National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers, London, pp 45–67Google Scholar
  54. Lusch R, Vargo SL, Tanniru M (2010) Service, value networks and learning. J Acad Mark Sci 38(1):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mele C, Spena TR, Colurcio M (2010) Co-creating value innovation through resource integration. Int J Qual Serv Sci 2(1):60–78Google Scholar
  56. Miettinen R (2013) Innovation, human capabilities, and democracy. Towards an enabling welfare state. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Miles I (1993) Services in the new industrial economy. Futures 25(6):653–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nordlund H (2009) Constructing customer understanding in front end of innovation. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, TampereGoogle Scholar
  59. Normann R, Ramirez R (1998) Designing interactive strategy. From value chain to value constellation. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  60. Preissl B (2000) Service innovation: what makes it different? Empirical evidence from Germany. In: Metcalfe JS, Miles I (eds) Innovation systems in the service economy. Measurement and case study analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 64–85Google Scholar
  61. Read S, Dew N, Sarasvathy SD, Song M, Wiltbank R (2009) Marketing under uncertainty: the logic of an effectual approach. J Mark 73(May):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Salunke S, Weerawardena J, McColl-Kennedy JR (2013) Competing through service innovation: the role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms. J Bus Res 66(8):1085–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sarasvathy SD, Simon HA (2000) Effectuation, near decomposability and the growth of entrepreneurial firms. Paper presented at The First Annual Technology Entrepreneurship Research Policy Conference, University of Maryland, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  64. Sarasvathy SD, Kotha S (2001) Dealing with knightian uncertainty in the new economy: the real networks case. In: Butler J (ed) Research on management and entrepreneurship, vol 1. CT: IAP Inc, Greenwich, pp 31–62Google Scholar
  65. Sarasvathy SD (2008) Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scott SG, Bruce RA (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manag J 37(3):580–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sundbo J (1997) Management of innovation in services. Serv Ind J 17(3):432–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sundbo J (2008) Customer-based innovation of knowledge e-services—the importance of after-innovation. Int J Serv Technol Manage 9(3–4):218–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sundbo J, Gallouj F (2000) Innovation as a loosely coupled system in services. Int J Serv Technol Manage 1(1):15–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sørensen F, Sundbo J, Mattsson J (2013) Organisational conditions for service encounter-based innovation. Res Policy 42:1446–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Toivonen M (2010) Different types of innovation processes in services and their organisational implications. In: Gallouj F, Djellal F (eds) The handbook of innovation and services. A multi-disciplinary perspective. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 221–249Google Scholar
  72. Toivonen M, Tuominen T (2009) Emergence of innovations in services. Serv Ind J 29(7):887–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tuomi I (2002) Networks of innovation: change and meaning in the age of the internet. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  74. Tuominen T (2013) Innovation and development activities in professional service firms—a role structure perspective. Aalto University School of Science, EspooGoogle Scholar
  75. Valminen K, Toivonen M (2011) Towards user-based productisation in services. In: Sundbo J, Toivonen M (eds) User-based innovation in services. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  76. Vargo S (2009) Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: a service-dominant logic perspective. J Bus Ind Mark 24(5/6):373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vargo S, Lusch R (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Mark 68(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vargo S, Lusch R (2008) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. J Acad Mark Sci 36(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vargo S, Lusch R (2011) It’s all B2B…and beyond: toward a systems perspective of the market. Ind Mark Manage 40:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Von Hippel E (1976) The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Res Policy 5(3):212–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Von Hippel E (1978) Successful industrial products from customer ideas. J Mark 42(1):39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  83. Von Hippel E, Katz R (2002) Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Manage Sci 48(7):821–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wrzesniewski A, Dutton JE (2001) Crafting a job: revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Acad Manage Rev 26(2):179–201Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mervi Hasu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marja Toivonen
    • 2
  • Tiina Tuominen
    • 3
  • Eveliina Saari
    • 1
  1. 1.The Finnish Institute for Occupational HealthHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.VTT Technical Research Centre of FinlandEspooFinland
  3. 3.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementAalto University School of ScienceEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations