Abstract
The last four decades have witnessed increasing research, policy discourse and the investment in government programs to foster innovation within the private sector manufacturing and service industries. Despite the adoption by many governments of the language of complexity theory and systems thinking in business and organisational management, and a growing awareness of the breadth of contexts and outcomes resulting from the innovation process, a broader commitment to investments in supporting skills development and capacity building for service innovation in businesses have yet to catch up. This chapter examines the factors that have contributed to the perpetuation of a limited conceptualisation of the forms in which innovation contributes economic value, and the government policy instruments invested into foster and sustain a diverse regional innovation system. This tangle of academic discourse, policy rhetoric and government programs aimed to support innovation will be examined through a case study of South Australia’s strategic plan and the agencies charged with fostering and supporting innovation in the state.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Despite broadening its agenda to encompass research in areas outside of the field of science and technology, the early advocacy arguments emanating from the OECD asserting the primary importance of science and technology to regional economic growth have left an enduring legacy of ensuring that investments in education and developing South Australia’s pool of human capital are heavily weighted towards scientific knowledge and new technologies.
- 2.
“Enculturation is the process where the culture that is currently established teaches an individual the accepted norms and values of the culture or society where the individual lives. The individual can become an accepted member and fulfill the needed functions and roles of the group. Most importantly the individual knows and establishes a context of boundaries and accepted behavior that dictates what is acceptable and not acceptable within the framework of that society. It teaches the individual their role within society as well as what is accepted behavior within that society and lifestyle” (Kottak and Conrad 2010. Window on humanity: a concise introduction to anthropology, 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Cited http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enculturation June 2013).
References
Amidon D, Macnamara D (2001) 7 C’s of Knowledge Leadership
Markusen A (1999) Fuzzy concepts scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Reg Stud 33(9):869–884
Baum F (1999) Social capital—is it good for your health? J Epidemiol Commun Heal (April 1999)
Brunner RD (1992) The policy movement as a policy problem. In: Dunn W, Kelly R (eds) Advances in policy studies since 1950. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick
Bryson J, Roering W (1987) Applying private-sector strategic planning in the public sector. J Am Plan Assoc 53(1):9–22
Carlsson B (2004) The digital economy: what is new and what is not? Struct Change Econ Dyn 15(3):245–264
Castles F (1990) The Dynamics of Policy Change: What Happened to the English-speaking Nations in the.
Cutler & Company Pty Ltd (2008) Venturous Australia Report
Department of the Premier and Cabinet (2004) South Australian Strategic Plan: Creating Opportunity, from www.stateplan.sa.gov.au
Dryzek J (2001) Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Polit Theor 29(5):651–669
Dvir R, Pasher E (2004) Innovation Engines For Knowledge Cities: an innovation ecology perspective. J Knowl Manag 8(5):16–27
Economic Development Board (2003) A framework for economic development in South Australia. Government of South Australia, Adelaide
Edquist C (1997) Systems of Innovation: Technologies. Institutions and Organisations, Pinter, London
Eisner M (1993) Regulatory Politics in Transition. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Eisner M (1994) Discovering Patterns in Regulatory History: Continuity, Change and Regulatory Regimes. Journal of Policy History 6(2):157–187
Fischer F (2003) Beyond empiricism: policy analysis as delberative practice. In: Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 209–227
Godin B (2006) The knowledge-based economy: conceptual framework or buzzword? J Technol Transf 31(Number 1):17–30
Green R (2009a) Australia’s knowledge-based future - how innovation policy can create long-term growth and jobs: UTS Faculty of Business
Green R (2009b) Creating Australia s knowledge-based future. Think.Change.Do, October 16
Green R, Agarwal R, Hall J (2009) Does Management Matter? Australian management practices research project. Paper presented at the RACMA -09. from www.racma.edu.au
Greif A (1994) Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies, The Journal of Political Economy 102:912-950
Hajer M (1993) Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Britian. In: Fischer F, Forester J (eds) The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press, Durham and London
Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Harris R, Milkis S (1989) The Politics of Regulatory Change. Oxford University Press, New York
Henton D, Melville J, Walesh K(1997) Grassroots leaders for a new economy: how civic entrepreneurs are building prosperous communities. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Herrington J, Reeves T, Oliver Ron (2009) A guide to authentic e-learning. Routledge, New York
Howard J (2008) Between a hard rock and a soft space: design, creative practice and innovation, A background paper prepared for the national innovation review, CHASS Occasional paper No 5. Council for Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (CHASS), Canberra
Howlett M, Lindquist E (2004) Teaching policy analysis: policy styles and their implications for training policy analysts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association
Lagendijk A (1997) Will new regionalism survive? Tracing dominant concepts in economic geography. (Version 2nd Rev Version 2003) CURDS, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Dodgson M, Hughes A, Foster S, Metcalfe J (2011) Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: the case of Australia. Res Policy 40(9):1145–1156
Di Francesco M (2001) Process not outcomes in new public management? Policy coherence in Australian Government. Draw Board: An Aust Rev Publ Aff 1(3):103–116
Mintzberg H (1994) The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harv Bus Rev 72(1):107
Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts
Nijssen, Bas, Vermeulen, Kemp (2006) Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences. Int J Res Mark 23(3):241–251
OECD (1996) The knowledge based economy. OECD, Paris
OECD (2001) Citries and regionsin the new learning economy. OECD, Paris
Osborne D, Gaebler T (1992) Reinventing government : how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector / Reinventing government : how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading
Radin B (2000) Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC
Raspe O, Van Oort F (2006) The knowledge economy and urban economic growth. Eur Plan Stud 14(9):1209–1234
Roos G (2012) Manufacturing into the Future. In: Program ATiR (ed) Government of South Australia, Adelaide
Roos G, Fernström L, Gupta O (2005) National Innovation Systems: Finland, Sweden & Australia Compared: learnings for Australia. In: Report prepared for the Australian Business Foundation, Australia
Oughton C, Landabasco M, Morgan K (2002) The regional innovation Paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy. J Technol Transf 27:97–110
Parsons W (2002) From muddling through to muddling up - evidence based policy making and the modernisation of british government. Publ Polic Admin 17(3):43–60
Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: towards a taxonomy, Research Policy. No. 13:343–373
Potter J, Wetherell M (1987) Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London Sage
NYC Departments of Planning (2013) Design and construction, and health and mental hygiene. Shaping Sidewalks, Active Design Supplement
Quinn R (1988) Beyond rational management: mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Quinn R, Rohrbaugh J (1983) A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manage Sci 29(3):363–377
Reenen J (2001) The new economy: reality and policy. Fiscal Stud 22(3):307–336
Reich R (ed) (1988) The power of public ideas. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge
Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Des Issues 8(2):5–21
Rogers PS, Hildebrandt H (1993) Competing values instruments for analyzing written and spoken management messages. Hum Resour Manage 32(1):121–142, 122
Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):1002–1037
Romer P (1993) Ideas and things: the concept of production is being re-tooled. The Economist September 11:70–72
Romer P (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. J Econ Perspect 8(1):3–22
Romer P (2007) Economic growth. In: Henderson D (ed) The concise encyclopedia of economics (Vol.). Liberty Fund
Schein Edgar H (1992) Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed) Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Sporer Z, Bhatia B (2004) Comparing innovation and commercialization activites in Knowledge-based societies. Paper presented at the Innovation and development in knowledge-based society/economy. Retrieved Sept 2007, from www.business.unisa.edu.au/cid
Talbot C (2003) Measuring public value a competing values approach. In: Herbert Simon Institute Manchester Business School (ed) The Work Foundation, London
Webb C (2000) Knowledge-Based Industries, DSTI/EAS/IND/SWP (2000) 5. OECD, Paris
Webb C (2001) Knowledge-Based Industries, DSTI/EAS/IND/SWP (2001) 13. OECD, Paris
Woolcock M (1998) Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theor Soc (27):151–208
Yanow D (2000) Conducting interperative policy analysis. Sage University Paper Series (Vol. 47) Sage, Thousand Oaks
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrew, J. (2015). Exposing an Economic Development Policy Clash: Predictability and Control Versus Creativity and Innovation. In: Agarwal, R., Selen, W., Roos, G., Green, R. (eds) The Handbook of Service Innovation. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6590-3_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6590-3_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6589-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6590-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)