Skip to main content

Exposing an Economic Development Policy Clash: Predictability and Control Versus Creativity and Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 4849 Accesses

Abstract

The last four decades have witnessed increasing research, policy discourse and the investment in government programs to foster innovation within the private sector manufacturing and service industries. Despite the adoption by many governments of the language of complexity theory and systems thinking in business and organisational management, and a growing awareness of the breadth of contexts and outcomes resulting from the innovation process, a broader commitment to investments in supporting skills development and capacity building for service innovation in businesses have yet to catch up. This chapter examines the factors that have contributed to the perpetuation of a limited conceptualisation of the forms in which innovation contributes economic value, and the government policy instruments invested into foster and sustain a diverse regional innovation system. This tangle of academic discourse, policy rhetoric and government programs aimed to support innovation will be examined through a case study of South Australia’s strategic plan and the agencies charged with fostering and supporting innovation in the state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Despite broadening its agenda to encompass research in areas outside of the field of science and technology, the early advocacy arguments emanating from the OECD asserting the primary importance of science and technology to regional economic growth have left an enduring legacy of ensuring that investments in education and developing South Australia’s pool of human capital are heavily weighted towards scientific knowledge and new technologies.

  2. 2.

    “Enculturation is the process where the culture that is currently established teaches an individual the accepted norms and values of the culture or society where the individual lives. The individual can become an accepted member and fulfill the needed functions and roles of the group. Most importantly the individual knows and establishes a context of boundaries and accepted behavior that dictates what is acceptable and not acceptable within the framework of that society. It teaches the individual their role within society as well as what is accepted behavior within that society and lifestyle” (Kottak and Conrad 2010. Window on humanity: a concise introduction to anthropology, 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Cited http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enculturation June 2013).

References

  • Amidon D, Macnamara D (2001) 7 C’s of Knowledge Leadership

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen A (1999) Fuzzy concepts scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Reg Stud 33(9):869–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum F (1999) Social capital—is it good for your health? J Epidemiol Commun Heal (April 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner RD (1992) The policy movement as a policy problem. In: Dunn W, Kelly R (eds) Advances in policy studies since 1950. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson J, Roering W (1987) Applying private-sector strategic planning in the public sector. J Am Plan Assoc 53(1):9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B (2004) The digital economy: what is new and what is not? Struct Change Econ Dyn 15(3):245–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles F (1990) The Dynamics of Policy Change: What Happened to the English-speaking Nations in the.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler & Company Pty Ltd (2008) Venturous Australia Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Premier and Cabinet (2004) South Australian Strategic Plan: Creating Opportunity, from www.stateplan.sa.gov.au

  • Dryzek J (2001) Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Polit Theor 29(5):651–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvir R, Pasher E (2004) Innovation Engines For Knowledge Cities: an innovation ecology perspective. J Knowl Manag 8(5):16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic Development Board (2003) A framework for economic development in South Australia. Government of South Australia, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist C (1997) Systems of Innovation: Technologies. Institutions and Organisations, Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner M (1993) Regulatory Politics in Transition. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner M (1994) Discovering Patterns in Regulatory History: Continuity, Change and Regulatory Regimes. Journal of Policy History 6(2):157–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer F (2003) Beyond empiricism: policy analysis as delberative practice. In: Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 209–227

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Godin B (2006) The knowledge-based economy: conceptual framework or buzzword? J Technol Transf 31(Number 1):17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R (2009a) Australia’s knowledge-based future - how innovation policy can create long-term growth and jobs: UTS Faculty of Business

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R (2009b) Creating Australia s knowledge-based future. Think.Change.Do, October 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R, Agarwal R, Hall J (2009) Does Management Matter? Australian management practices research project. Paper presented at the RACMA -09. from www.racma.edu.au

  • Greif A (1994) Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies, The Journal of Political Economy 102:912-950

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M (1993) Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Britian. In: Fischer F, Forester J (eds) The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press, Durham and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R, Milkis S (1989) The Politics of Regulatory Change. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Henton D, Melville J, Walesh K(1997) Grassroots leaders for a new economy: how civic entrepreneurs are building prosperous communities. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington J, Reeves T, Oliver Ron (2009) A guide to authentic e-learning. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard J (2008) Between a hard rock and a soft space: design, creative practice and innovation, A background paper prepared for the national innovation review, CHASS Occasional paper No 5. Council for Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (CHASS), Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M, Lindquist E (2004) Teaching policy analysis: policy styles and their implications for training policy analysts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagendijk A (1997) Will new regionalism survive? Tracing dominant concepts in economic geography. (Version 2nd Rev Version 2003) CURDS, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson M, Hughes A, Foster S, Metcalfe J (2011) Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: the case of Australia. Res Policy 40(9):1145–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Francesco M (2001) Process not outcomes in new public management? Policy coherence in Australian Government. Draw Board: An Aust Rev Publ Aff 1(3):103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1994) The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harv Bus Rev 72(1):107

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen, Bas, Vermeulen, Kemp (2006) Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences. Int J Res Mark 23(3):241–251

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1996) The knowledge based economy. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Citries and regionsin the new learning economy. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne D, Gaebler T (1992) Reinventing government : how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector / Reinventing government : how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin B (2000) Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Raspe O, Van Oort F (2006) The knowledge economy and urban economic growth. Eur Plan Stud 14(9):1209–1234

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos G (2012) Manufacturing into the Future. In: Program ATiR (ed) Government of South Australia, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos G, Fernström L, Gupta O (2005) National Innovation Systems: Finland, Sweden & Australia Compared: learnings for Australia. In: Report prepared for the Australian Business Foundation, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Oughton C, Landabasco M, Morgan K (2002) The regional innovation Paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy. J Technol Transf 27:97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons W (2002) From muddling through to muddling up - evidence based policy making and the modernisation of british government. Publ Polic Admin 17(3):43–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: towards a taxonomy, Research Policy. No. 13:343–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter J, Wetherell M (1987) Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • NYC Departments of Planning (2013) Design and construction, and health and mental hygiene. Shaping Sidewalks, Active Design Supplement

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn R (1988) Beyond rational management: mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn R, Rohrbaugh J (1983) A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manage Sci 29(3):363–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reenen J (2001) The new economy: reality and policy. Fiscal Stud 22(3):307–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich R (ed) (1988) The power of public ideas. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Des Issues 8(2):5–21

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers PS, Hildebrandt H (1993) Competing values instruments for analyzing written and spoken management messages. Hum Resour Manage 32(1):121–142, 122

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):1002–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1993) Ideas and things: the concept of production is being re-tooled. The Economist September 11:70–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. J Econ Perspect 8(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (2007) Economic growth. In: Henderson D (ed) The concise encyclopedia of economics (Vol.). Liberty Fund

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein Edgar H (1992) Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed) Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporer Z, Bhatia B (2004) Comparing innovation and commercialization activites in Knowledge-based societies. Paper presented at the Innovation and development in knowledge-based society/economy. Retrieved Sept 2007, from www.business.unisa.edu.au/cid

  • Talbot C (2003) Measuring public value a competing values approach. In: Herbert Simon Institute Manchester Business School (ed) The Work Foundation, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb C (2000) Knowledge-Based Industries, DSTI/EAS/IND/SWP (2000) 5. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb C (2001) Knowledge-Based Industries, DSTI/EAS/IND/SWP (2001) 13. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock M (1998) Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theor Soc (27):151–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow D (2000) Conducting interperative policy analysis. Sage University Paper Series (Vol. 47) Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Andrew .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andrew, J. (2015). Exposing an Economic Development Policy Clash: Predictability and Control Versus Creativity and Innovation. In: Agarwal, R., Selen, W., Roos, G., Green, R. (eds) The Handbook of Service Innovation. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6590-3_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6590-3_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6589-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6590-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics