Advertisement

Innovating Universities: Technocratic Reform and Beyond

  • Kereen Reiger
  • Toni SchofieldEmail author
  • Margaret Peters
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter critically examines innovations and ‘reforms’ in university service provision and their management, focusing on Australia as illustrative of broader global trends associated with the integration of higher education (HE) into the international market economy. We argue that more than the usual economic, technocratic approaches to service innovation are required because of the complexity and unpredictability that characterize the entire field of knowledge-based services. Instead we establish an interdisciplinary social science-based approach drawing from critical organization studies and complexity perspectives. To apply our alternative framing of both the issues and the intellectual tools required for effective analysis, we examine three dimensions of innovation, those in the policy, governance and academic work processes through which Australian universities have been transformed over the last 25 years. Our contribution suggests that dominant approaches to university ‘reform’ risk diminishing the creativity and critical investigation skills required for these institutions to advance service innovation and emerging forms of society, not just a ‘knowledge-based’ and ‘service-oriented’ economy.

Keywords

Higher education Knowledge services Organizations Complexity perspective Academic work Governance 

References

  1. Andersen B, Howells J, Hull R, Miles I, and Roberts J (2000, 2004) Knowledge and innovation in the new service economy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Google Scholar
  2. Anderson G (2006) Carving out time and space in the managerial university. J Org Ch Mange 19(5):578–592Google Scholar
  3. Antonelli C, Patrucco PP, Rossi F (2010) The economics of knowledge interaction and the changeable role of universities. In: Gallouj F, Djellal F (eds) The handbook of innovation services., A multi-disciplinary perspectiveEdward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  4. Australia Universities (2012) An agenda for Australia 2013–2016: a smarter Australia. Universities Australia Publication, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  5. Bento FC (2013) A complex perspective towards leadership in academic departments: investigating organisational changes in a Norwegian research-intensive university. Int J Complex Leadersh Manage 1(2):116–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berwick DM (2009) What ‘patient-centered’ should mean: confessions of an extremist. Health Affairs ~ Web Exclusive w555-64. ©2009 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w555
  7. Blackman D, Kennedy M, Swansson J, Richardson A (2009) University governance in uncertain times: refocusing on knowledge creation and innovation. J Inst Res 14(1):1–8Google Scholar
  8. Blackman D, Kennedy M (2009) Knowledge management and effective university governance. J Knowl Manag 13(6):547–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackmore JA, Brennan M, Zipin LD (eds) (2010) Re-positioning university governance and academic work. Sense Publishers, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackmore JA (2010) Research assessment: a calculative technology governing quality, accountability and equity. In: Blackmore JA, Brennan M, Zipin LD (eds) Re-positioning university governance and academic work. Sense Publishers, Netherlands, pp 67–84Google Scholar
  11. Blackmore P, Kandiko C (2012) Strategic curriculum change: global trends in universities. Routledge, Abindon, OxonGoogle Scholar
  12. BNI/QuinetiQ (2008) Excellence in service innovation. http://www.innovation-network.org.uk/DocumentLibrary/Excellenceinserviceinnovation.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2013
  13. Bolden R, Petrov G, Gosling J (2009) Distributed leadership in higher education: rhetoric and reality. Educ Manag Adm Leadersh J 37(2):257–277Google Scholar
  14. Bradley D (2008) Review of Australian higher education. Final report. Commonwealth of Australia. www.deewr.gov.au/he_review_finalreport
  15. Bradshaw P, Fredette C (2009) Academic governance of universities; reflections of a senate chair on moving from theory to practice and back. J Manag Enq 18:123–133Google Scholar
  16. Brennan M (2010) Dividing the university: perspectives from the middle. In: Blackmore J, Brennan M, Zippin LD (eds) Repositioning university governance and academic work. Sense Publishers, Netherlands, pp 115–132Google Scholar
  17. Bryson C (2004) What about the workers? The expansion of higher education and the transformation of academic work. Ind Relat J 35(1):38–57Google Scholar
  18. Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carr K (2009) Powering ideas: an innovation agenda for the 21st century. Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carnegie GD, Tuck J (2010) Understanding the ABC of university governance. Aust J Public Adm 69(4):431–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christensen Clayton M, Eyring Henry J (2011) The innovative university: changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. Jossey-Bass, Wiley & Sons, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  22. Christensen T, Laegried P (2007) Transcending new public management: transformation of public sector reforms. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  23. Chubb Ian (2012) 2012 National research investment plan. Commonwealth of Australia. Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  24. Cilliers P (2005) Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory Cult Soc J 22(5):255–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clegg Stewart R, Courpasson D, Phillips N (2006) Power and organizations. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Clegg S (2008) Academic identities under threat? Br Educ Res J 34(3):329–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Coates H, Dobson I, Edwards D, Friedmand T, Goedegebuure, L Meek L (2009) The attractiveness of the Australian academic profession: a comparative analysis. LH Martin Institute, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  28. Connell R, Fawcett B, Meagher G (2009) Neoliberalism, new public management and the human service professions: introduction to the special issue. J Soc 48(4):331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crock C (2010) Patient-centred healthcare: and its impact on patient safety. Report for the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia, p 1–28. http://www.churchilltrust.com.au/site_media/fellows/2009_Crock_Catherine.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2012
  30. Dawkins J (1998) Higher education: a policy statement. White Paper 1998. Commonwealth Government of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  31. Davies B (2003) Complexity and education: vital simultaneities. Educ Philos Theory J 40(1):89–97Google Scholar
  32. Dooley AH (2007) Thematic analysis: the role of academic boards in university governance, Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA) Occasional Publications Series Number 12, AUQA, Melbourne. http://www.auqa.edu.au/files/publications/academic%20boards_%20final_website.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2013
  33. Ernst and Young (2012) University of the future. A thousand year old industry on the cusp of profound change. Ernst & Young, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  34. Evans M (2004) Killing thinking: the death of universities. Continuum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Fitzgerald L, Ferlie E, Wood M, Hawkins C (2002) Interlocking interactions, the diffusion of innovations in health care. Hum Relat J 55(12):1429–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Folbre N (2001) The invisible heart: economics and family values. New Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Frank D, Gabler J (2006) Reconstructing the university: worldwide shifts in academia in the 20th century. Stanford University Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  38. Fredman N, Doughney J (2011) Academic dissatisfaction, managerial change and neo-liberalism. High Educ J 64(July):41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frenken K (2006) Innovation evolution and complexity theory. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MAGoogle Scholar
  40. Gallouj F, Djellal F (eds) (2010) The handbook of innovation services. In: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  41. Gallouj F, Savona M (2009) Innovation in services: a review of the debate and a research agenda. J Evolut Econ 19(2):141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Goldstein J (2008) Introduction: complexity science applied to innovation—theory meets praxis. Innov J: Publ Sect Innov J 13(3):2–16Google Scholar
  43. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P (2004) How to spread good ideas: a systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Global Universities Network of Innovation (GUNI) (2007) Higher education in the world 2007. Accreditation for quality assurance; what is at stake?, 2nd edn. GUNI, Palgrave Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Harpur J (2010) Innovation, profit and the common good in higher education: the new alchemy. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hattie J, Marsh HW (1996) The relationship between research and teaching: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res J 66(4):507–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hattie J, Timberley H (2007) The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res J 77(1):81–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Howells J (2000) Innovation and services; new conceptual frameworks. CRIC, The University of Manchester and UMIST, CRIC Discussion paper no 38, August, 2000Google Scholar
  49. Howells J (2010) Services and innovation and service innovation: new theoretical directions. In: Gallouj F, Djellal F (eds) The handbook of innovation services., A multi-disciplinary perspectiveEdward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  50. Jaggars SS, Bailey T (2010) Effectiveness of fully online courses for college students: response to a department of education meta-analysis. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University, NY, 2013. http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu. Accessed May 10
  51. Kirkby D, Reiger K (forthcoming) A design for learning? A case study of the hidden costs of curriculum and organisational change. In: Thornton M, Withers G (eds) Markets and Modern University. ANU E-press, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  52. Lyons M, Ingersoll L (2010) Regulated autonomy or autonomous regulation? Collective bargaining and academic workloads in Australian universities. J High Educ Policy Manag 32(3):137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marginson S (2010) How universities have been positioned as teams in a knowledge economy world cup. In: Blackmore JA, Brennan M, Zipin LD (eds) Re-positioning university governance and academic work. Sense Publishers, Netherlands, pp 17–34Google Scholar
  54. Marginson S (2013) On the impossibility of markets in higher education. J High Educ Policy 28(3):353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Marginson S, Considine M (2000) The enterprise university: power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Maringe F (2011) The student as consumer: affordances and constraints in a transforming higher education environment. In: Molesworth M, Nixon E, Scullion R (eds) The marketisation of higher education: the student as consumer. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 142–154Google Scholar
  57. Mason M (2008) Complexity theory and the philosophy of education. Educ Philos Theory J 40(1):4–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morin E (1999) Seven complex lessons in education for the future. (trans: Poller N). UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  59. Mowery D, Sampat B (2005) Universities in national innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J, Mowrey DC, Nelson RR (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp 209–239Google Scholar
  60. Mowles C (2012) Keeping means and ends in view- linking practical judgement, ethics and emergence. J Int Dev 24(5):544–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Noordegraaf M (2007) From “pure” to “hybrid” professionalism: present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Adm Soc J 39(6):761–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nordensvard J (2011) The consumer metaphor versus the citizen metaphor: different sets of roles for students. In: Molesworth M, Nixon E, Scullion R (eds) The marketisation of higher education: the student as consumer. Routledge, Abingdon, UK, pp 157–169Google Scholar
  63. Olssen M, Peters MA (2005) Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism. J Educ Policy 20(3):313–345. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Petit P (2010) Innovations and services: on biases and beyond. In: Gallouj F, Djellal F (eds) The handbook of innovation services., A multi-disciplinary perspectiveEdward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  65. Reiger KM (1985) The disenchantment of the home: modernising the Australian family 1880–1940. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  66. Reiger K, Lane K, Schofield T, Short S (2008) The complexity of social practice: understanding inertia and change in maternity care organisations. In: Marjoribanks T et al (eds) Reimagining sociology, Conference publication proceedings. The Australian Sociological Association, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  67. Rowlands J (2012) Accountability, quality assurance and performativity: the changing role of the academic board. Qual High Educ J 18:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Skolnik ML (2010) Quality assurance in higher education as a political process. High Educ Manag Policy J 22(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Slaughter S, Rhoades G (2004) Academic capitalism and the new economy: markets, state, and higher education. John Hopkins UP, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  70. Stacey R, Griffin D (eds) (2005) A complexity perspective researching organizations: taking experience seriously. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  71. Stacey R (2007) Strategic management and organizational dynamics: the challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organizations. Prentice Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  72. Stacey R, Griffin D (eds) (2008) Complexity and the experience of values, conflict and compromise in organizations. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  73. Stacey R (2010) Complexity and organizational reality: uncertainty and the needs to rethink management after the collapse of investment capitalism. Routledge, London, UK and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Tosey P (2002) Teaching on the edge of chaos. Complexity theory, learning systems and enhancement. Working paper: school of education studies. University of Surrey, GuilfordGoogle Scholar
  75. Trowler P (2008) Cultures and change in higher education: theories and practices. Palgrave MacMillan, UKGoogle Scholar
  76. US Committee on Research Universities, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council (2012) Research universities and the future of America: ten breakthrough actions vital to our nation’s prosperity and security. The National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  77. Vidovich L, Sleek R (2010) Bringing universities to account? Exploring some global and local tensions. J Ed Plcy 16(5):431–453Google Scholar
  78. Vilkinis T, Peters M (2012) Teaching and learning—the role played by academic boards. LE10-1724. Final report. Office for learning and teaching, Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  79. Vilkinis T, Peters M (2013) Academic governance provided by academic boards within the Australian higher education sector. J High Educ Policy Manag. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2013.825419
  80. Waring M (1988) Counting for nothing: what men value and what women are worth. Allen and Unwin, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  81. Weber M (1921–1922/1978) Economy and society, vols 1, 2. University of California Press, Berkley (Roth G, Wittich C (eds) (1978))Google Scholar
  82. Weick K (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications Inc, LondonGoogle Scholar
  83. West R (1998) Learning for life. Final report. Review of higher education financing and policy. Commonwealth Government of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  84. Zipin L (2010) Situating university governance in the ethico-emotive ground tone of post/late times. In: Blackmore J, Brennan M, Zipin LD (eds) Repositioning university governance and academic work. Sense Publishers, Netherlands, pp 147–162Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kereen Reiger
    • 1
  • Toni Schofield
    • 2
    Email author
  • Margaret Peters
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Social Sciences and CommunicationsLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Health SciencesThe University of SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
  3. 3.Hawke Research InstituteThe University of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations