Skip to main content

The Role of Socio-Technical Experiments in Introducing Sustainable Product-Service System Innovations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Handbook of Service Innovation

Abstract

Product-Service System (PSS) innovations represent a promising approach to sustainability, but their implementation and diffusion are hindered by several cultural, corporate, and regulative barriers. Hence, an important challenge is not only to conceive sustainable PSS concepts, but also to understand how to manage, support, and orient the introduction and diffusion of these concepts. Building upon insights from transition studies (in particular, the concepts of Strategic Niche Management and Transition Management), and through an action research project, the chapter investigates the role of design in introducing sustainable radical service innovations. A key role is given to the implementation of socio-technical experiments, partially protected spaces where innovations can be incubated and tested, become more mature, and potentially favor the implementation and scaling up process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Several studies indicate that we can only consider sustainable those socio-technical systems whose use of environmental resources is at least 90 % less than what is currently done in mature industrial contexts (Schmidt-Bleek 1996).

  2. 2.

    For instance: PROSECCO, Product and Service Co-Design process (2002–2004, FP5); HiCS, Highly Costumerized Solutions (2001–2004, FP5); MEPSS, Method for PSS development (2001–2004, FP5); SusProNet, the sustainable product service design network (2002–2004, FP5); SCORE!, Sustainable COnsumption Research Exchange! (2006–2009, FP6).

  3. 3.

    For an extensive review of PSS design methods and tools see Tukker and Tischner (2006a).

  4. 4.

    The most diffused ones are: social experiments (Verheul and Vergragt 1995), experiments in Strategic Niche Management (Kemp et al. 1998), transition experiments (Rotmans et al. 2000; Van den Bosch 2010), bounded socio-technical experiments (Brown et al. 2003).

  5. 5.

    The crucial dilemma of protection measures is to find the right balance between the need to nurture the innovation and the need to prepare it for the selection pressures of a market environment (Weber et al. 1999).

  6. 6.

    For a detailed description of the research methodology see Ceschin (2012).

  7. 7.

    In particular the analysis focused on: the role of socio-technical experiments; the socio-economic actors involved during the process; the negotiation processes and alignment of actors’ expectations; the actors learning processes.

  8. 8.

    Prototyped by IPSIA “A. Ferrari” Maranello and Politecnico di Milano in 2006.

  9. 9.

    Gumus, H. (2009) Kanga: a sustainable system design for the transportation of learners with disabilities in Cape Town—South Africa. Master’s degree thesis. Politecnico di Milano.

  10. 10.

    Among them: (I) the offering diagram, to succinctly visualize what the PSS offers to customers; (II) the interaction table, to visualize how the PSS offer is delivered to customers (sequence of interactions occurring at front-desk level and back-stage level); (III) the system map, to visualize the structure of the value chain; (IV) the sustainability diagram, to visualize the environmental, socio-ethical and economic benefits delivered by the PSS.

References

  • Behrendt S, Jasch C, Kortman J, Hrauda G, Pfitzner R, Velte D (2003) Eco-service development: reinventing supply and demand in the European Union. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes L (2000) Energy efficiency fallacies revisited. Energy Policy 28(6/7):355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown HS, Vergragt PJ, Green K, Berchicci L (2003) Learning for sustainability transition through bounded socio-technical experiments in personal mobility. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 13(3):298–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceschin F (2012) The introduction and scaling up of sustainable product-service systems: a new role for strategic design for sustainability. PhD thesis, Politecnico di Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceschin F (2013) Critical factors for managing the implementation and diffusion of eco-efficient product-service systems: insights from innovation sciences and companies’ experiences. J Clean Prod 45:74–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceschin F (2014a) Sustainable product-service systems. Between strategic design and transition studies. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceschin F (2014b) How the design of socio-technical experiments can enable radical changes for sustainability. Int J Des (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceschin F, Vezzoli C (2010) The role of public policy in stimulating radical environmental impact reduction in the automotive sector: the need to focus on product-service system innovation. Int J Automot Technol Manage 10(2/3):321–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook M, Bhamra T, Lemon M (2006) The transfer and application of product service-systems: from academia to UK manufacturing firms. J Clean Prod 14(17):1455–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multilevel perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8/9):1257–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW, Raven RPJM (2006) Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: Ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973-2003). Technol Anal Strategic Manag 18:375-392

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, van Halen C, te Riele H, Rommes, P (1999) Product services systems, ecological and economic basics, report 1999/36. VROM, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen E, Jalas M (2000) Dematerialisation through services: a review and evaluation of the debate. Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Protection Department, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillgren PA, Seravalli A, Emilson A (2011) Prototyping and iInfrastructuring in design of social innovation. CoDesign: Int J CoCreation Des Arts 7(3–4):169–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogma R, Kemp R, Schot J, Truffer B (2002) Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The approach of Strategic Niche Management. Spon Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • James P, Hopkinson P (2002) Service innovation for sustainability. A new option for UK environmental policy? Bradford University, Bradford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jégou F (2011) Social innovations and regional acupuncture towards sustainability. Chin J Des 214:56–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R (1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 10(2):175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis S, McTaggart R (1988) The action research planner. Deakin University Press, Geelong

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini E (1999) Sustainable solutions 2020: systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference towards sustainable product design. Borschette Conference Centre, Brussels, 12–13 July 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini E, Vezzoli C, Clark G. (2001) Product service systems: Using an existing concept as a new approach to sustainability. J Des Res 1(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meroni A (2008) Strategic Design to take care of the territory. Networking creative communities to link people and places in a scenario of sustainable development. Keynote presented at the P&D design 2008- 8º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, Campus Santo Amaro, San Paolo

    Google Scholar 

  • Mont O (2002) Clarifying the concept of product-service system. J Clean Prod 10(3):237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mont O (2004) Product-Service Systems: panacea or myth? Ph.D. dissertation, Lund University

    Google Scholar 

  • Mont O, Lindhqvist T (2003) The role of public policy in advancement of product service systems. J Clean Prod 11(8):905–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven RPJM (2005) Strategic niche management for biomass. PhD thesis,Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason PE, Bradbury H (eds) (2001) Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip A, Kemp R (1998) Technological change. In: Rayner S, Malone EL (eds) Human choice and climate change, Vol. 2 (pp. 327-399). Batelle Press, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J, Loorbach D (2010) Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance: a systemic and reflexive approach. In: Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J (eds) Transitions to sustainable development new directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J, Kemp R, van Asselt M, Geels FW, Verbong G, Molendijk K (2000) Transities & transitiemanagement: De casus van een emissiearme energievoorziening (Transitions & transition management: the casus of a low emission energy supply). Maastricht University, Maastricht

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J, Kemp R, Asselt MBA (2001) More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight 3:15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Bleek F (1996) MIPS book or the fossil makers: factor 10 and more. Boston, Basel, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schot JA, Hoogma R (1996) De Invoering van Duurzame Technologies: Strategisch Niche Management als Beleidsinstrument. DTO Programme, Delft University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons L, Slob A, Holswilder H, Tukker A (2001) The fourth generation: new strategies call for new eco-indicators. Environ Qual Manage 11:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahel WR et al (2000) From manufacturing industry to a service economy, from selling products to selling the performance of products. Product-Life Institute, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoughton M, Shapiro KG, Feng L, Reiskin E (1998) The business case for epr: a feasibility study for developing a decision-support tool. Tellus Institute, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Tischner U (eds) (2006a) New business for old Europe. Product services, sustainability and competitiveness. Greenleaf publishers, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Tischner U (2006b) Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. reflections from a decade of research. J Clean Prod 14(17):1552–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) (2002) Product-service systems and sustainability. Opportunities for sustainable solutions. UNEP, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Poel I (2000) On the role of outsiders in technical development. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 12(3):383–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch S (2010) Transition experiments. Exploring societal changes towards sustainability. PhD thesis, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheul H, Vergragt PJ (1995) Social experiments in the development of environmental technology: a bottom-up perspective. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 7(3):315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M, Hoogma R, Lane B, Schot J (1999) Experimenting with sustainable transport innovations: a workbook for strategic niche management. Universiteit Twente, Twente

    Google Scholar 

  • White AL, Stoughton M, Feng L (1999) Servicizing: the quiet transition to extended product responsibility. Tellus Institute, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Ceschin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ceschin, F. (2015). The Role of Socio-Technical Experiments in Introducing Sustainable Product-Service System Innovations. In: Agarwal, R., Selen, W., Roos, G., Green, R. (eds) The Handbook of Service Innovation. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6590-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6590-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6589-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6590-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics