Databases for Assessing the Outcomes of the Treatment of Patients with Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Disease: The Perspective of Critical Care

  • Michael G. Gaies
  • Howard E. Jeffries
  • Randall Wetzel
  • Steven M. Schwartz
Chapter

Abstract

Several barriers exist that make measuring critical care outcomes and quality a challenge. Particularly in the field of pediatric cardiac critical care it can be difficult to disentangle an intensive care unit’s contribution to patient outcome from those of other services (e.g. surgery), and appropriate risk-adjustment remains an elusive goal. Databases provide a key source of information that can be used to overcome some of these barriers. We explain the key database components necessary to provide clinicians and researchers with the foundation to measure and improve quality in this clinical arena. Databases that are currently used in the critical care community are described, including the Virtual PICU System (VPS) database. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how to move from simply assessing patient outcomes using databases to achieving quality improvement through collaborative. We review new collaborative in pediatric cardiac critical care and cardiac surgery, the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4), that is implementing the lessons learned from successful quality improvement pioneers.

Keywords

Pediatric Cardiac Critical care Database Registries Outcomes Quality 

References

  1. 1.
    Boneva RS, Botto LD, Moore CA, Yang Q, Correa A, Erickson JD. Mortality associated with congenital heart defects in the United States: trends and racial disparities, 1979–1997. Circulation. 2001;103:2376–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K. Center-specific differences in mortality: preliminary analyses using the Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) method. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:97–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K, Newburger JW, Spray TL, Moller JH, Iezzoni LI. Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:110–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML, Lacour-Gayet FG, et al. Stratification of complexity improves the utility and accuracy of outcomes analysis in a multi-institutional congenital heart surgery database: application of the Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) and Aristotle Systems in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) congenital heart surgery database. Pediatr Cardiol. 2009;30:1117–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacobs JP, Lacour-Gayet FG, Jacobs ML, et al. Initial application in the STS congenital database of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1635–49; discussion -49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jacobs ML, Jacobs JP, Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K, Clarke DR, Lacour-Gayet F. Stratification of complexity: the risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery-1 method and the Aristotle complexity score–past, present, and future. Cardiol Young. 2008;18 Suppl 2:163–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML, Maruszewski B, et al. Initial application in the EACTS and STS congenital heart surgery databases of an empirically derived methodology of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:775–9; discussion 779–80.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Slater A, Shann F, Pearson G, Paediatric Index of Mortality Study Group. PIM2: a revised version of the paediatric index of mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:278–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Czaja AS, Scanlon MC, Kuhn EM, Jeffries HE. Performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 for pediatric cardiac surgery patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12:184–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Metnitz PG, Lang T, Vesely H, Valentin A, Le Gall JR. Ratios of observed to expected mortality are affected by differences in case mix and quality of care. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26:1466–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy-Filkins R, Teres D, Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW. Effect of changing patient mix on the performance of an intensive care unit severity-of-illness model: how to distinguish a general from a specialty intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1968–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patel PA, Grant BJ. Application of mortality prediction systems to individual intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:977–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Straney L, Clements A, Parslow RC, et al. Paediatric index of mortality 3: an updated model for predicting mortality in pediatric intensive care*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14:673–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pollack MM, Patel KM, Ruttimann UE. PRISM III: an updated pediatric risk of mortality score. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:743–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mildh L, Pettila V, Sairanen H, Rautiainen P. Predictive value of paediatric risk of mortality score and risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery score after paediatric open-heart surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6:628–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacobs JP. Introduction–databases and the assessment of complications associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease. Cardiol Young. 2008;18 Suppl 2:1–37.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML, Mavroudis C, et al. Nomenclature and databases for the surgical treatment of congenital cardiac disease–an updated primer and an analysis of opportunities for improvement. Cardiol Young. 2008;18 Suppl 2:38–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chang RK, Klitzner TS. Can regionalization decrease the number of deaths for children who undergo cardiac surgery? A theoretical analysis. Pediatrics. 2002;109:173–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bazzani LG, Marcin JP. Case volume and mortality in pediatric cardiac surgery patients in California, 1998–2003. Circulation. 2007;115:2652–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Welke KF, Diggs BS, Karamlou T, Ungerleider RM. The relationship between hospital surgical case volumes and mortality rates in pediatric cardiac surgery: a national sample, 1988–2005. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:889–96; discussion -96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pasquali SK, Jacobs JP, Shook GJ, et al. Linking clinical registry data with administrative data using indirect identifiers: implementation and validation in the congenital heart surgery population. Am Heart J. 2010;160:1099–104.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, et al. A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA. 1996;275:841–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Share DA, Campbell DA, Birkmeyer N, et al. How a regional collaborative of hospitals and physicians in Michigan cut costs and improved the quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:636–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael G. Gaies
    • 1
  • Howard E. Jeffries
    • 2
  • Randall Wetzel
    • 3
  • Steven M. Schwartz
    • 4
  1. 1.Pediatrics and Communicable DiseasesC.S. Mott Children’s HospitalAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric Critical CareSeattle Children’s HospitalSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Anesthesiology Critical Care MedicineChildren’s Hospital Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Department of Critical Care MedicineThe Hospital for Sick Children, University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations