Abstract
Grading is applied only to malignant tumors. Usually, a scale of 1–4 is used to grade malignant tumors based on their histological resemblance to “normal counterparts.” Conventional osteosarcomas are high-grade tumors. Chondrosarcoma is graded on a scale of 1–3. Ewing’s sarcoma and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma are always regarded as high-grade tumors. Malignant lymphoma, myeloma, chordoma, and adamantinoma are not graded because grading has not been proved to correlate with clinical behavior.
Staging is the process of classifying a tumor with respect to its degree of differentiation as well as its local and distant spread in order to estimate the prognosis of the patient. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society adopted staging systems for both benign and malignant bone tumors. Benign lesions are graded 1 or 2 according to the degree of local aggressiveness. A surgical staging system for malignant lesions is accomplished by assessment of the surgical grade, low or high grade; the local extent, intra- or extracompartmental; and the presence or absence of regional or distant metastases. Four types of surgical margin are also recognized: intralesional margin, marginal margin, wide margin, and radical margin.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anderson MW, Temple HT, Dussault RG, Kaplan PA. Perspective. Compartmental anatomy: relevance to staging and biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. AJR. 1999;173:1663–71.
Evans HL, Ayala AG, Romsdahl MM. Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone. A clinicopathologic analysis with emphasis on histologic grading. Cancer. 1977;40:818–31.
Inwards CY, Unni KK. Classification and grading of bone sarcomas. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 1995;9:545–69.
Peabody TD, Gibbs CP, Simon MA. Current concepts review. Evaluation and staging of musculoskeletal neoplasms. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80-A:1204–18.
Sanerkin NG. The diagnosis and grading of chondrosarcoma of bone. A combined cytologic and histologic approach. Cancer. 1980;45:582–94.
Schulte M, Brecht-Krauss D, Heymer B, Guhlmann A, Hartwig E, Sarkar MR, Diederichs CG, Von Baer A, Kotzerke J, Reske SN. Grading of tumors and tumorlike lesions of bone: evaluation by FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1695–701.
Takeshita H, Kusuzaki K, Kuzuhara A, Tsuji Y, Ashihara T, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ, Springfield DS, Hirasawa Y. Anticancer Res. 2001;21:1271–8.
Wolf RE, Enneking WF. The staging and surgery of musculoskeletal neoplasms. Orthop Clin N Am. 1996;27:473–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Park, YK. (2015). Grading and Staging. In: Santini-Araujo, E., Kalil, R., Bertoni, F., Park, YK. (eds) Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions of Bone. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6578-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6578-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6577-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6578-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)