Advertisement

Face Anti-spoofing: Multi-spectral Approach

Chapter
Part of the Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition book series (ACVPR)

Abstract

With the wide applications of face recognition, spoofing attack is becoming a big threat to their security. Conventional face recognition systems usually adopt behavioral challenge-response or texture analysis methods to resist spoofing attacks, however, these methods require high user cooperation and are sensitive to the imaging quality and environments. In this chapter, we present a multi-spectral face recognition system working in VIS (Visible) and NIR (Near Infrared) spectrums, which is robust to various spoofing attacks and user cooperation free. First, we introduce the structure of the system from several aspects including: imaging device, face landmarking, feature extraction, matching, VIS, and NIR sub-systems. Then the performance of the multi-spectral system and each subsystem is evaluated and analyzed. Finally, we describe the multi-spectral image-based anti-spoofing module, and report its performance under photo attacks. Experiments on a spoofing database show the excellent performance of the proposed system both in recognition rate and anti-spoofing ability. Compared with conventional VIS face recognition system, the multi-spectral system has two advantages: (1) By combining the VIS and NIR spectrums, the system can resist VIS photo and NIR photo attacks easily. And users’ cooperation is no longer needed, making the system user friendly and fast. (2) Due to the precise key-point localization, Gabor feature extraction and unsupervised learning, the system is robust to pose, illumination and expression variations. Generally, its recognition rate is higher than the VIS subsystem.

Keywords

Face Recognition Face Image Gabor Feature Active Shape Model Face Recognition System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation Project #61070146, #61105023, #61103156, #61105037, National IoT R&D Project #2150510, European Union FP7 Project #257289 (TABULA RASA http://www.tabularasa-euproject.org), and AuthenMetric R&D Funds.

References

  1. 1.
    Duc N, Minh B (2009) Your face is not your password. Black Hat ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li J, Wang Y, Tan T, Jain AK (2004) Live face detection based on the analysis of fourier spectra. In: Jain AK, Ratha NK (eds) Society of photo-optical instrumentation engineers (SPIE) conference series, vol 5404, pp 296–303Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tan X, Li Y, Liu J, Jiang L (2010) Face liveness detection from a single image with sparse low rank bilinear discriminative model. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on computer vision: Part VI., ECCV’10. Springer, Berlin, pp 504–517Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maatta J, Hadid A, Pietikainen M (2011) Face spoofing detection from single images using micro-texture analysis. In: Biometrics (IJCB), 2011 international joint conference on, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pan G, Sun L, Wu Z, Lao S (2007) Eyeblink-based anti-spoofing in face recognition from a generic webcamera. In: Computer vision, 2007. ICCV 2007. IEEE 11th international conference on, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kollreider K, Fronthaler H, Bigun J (2008) Verifying liveness by multiple experts in face biometrics. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, 2008. CVPRW ’08. IEEE computer society conference on, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kollreider K, Fronthaler H, Bigun J (2005) Evaluating liveness by face images and the structure tensor. In: Automatic identification advanced technologies, 2005. Fourth IEEE workshop on, pp 75–80Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chetty G, Wagner M (2004) Liveness verification in audio-video speaker authentication. In: In proceeding of the 10th ASSTA conference, pp 358–363. Macquarie University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anjos A, Marcel S (2011) Counter-measures to photo attacks in face recognition: a public database and a baseline. In: Biometrics (IJCB), 2011 international joint conference on, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bai J, Ng TT, Gao X, Shi YQ (2010) Is physics-based liveness detection truly possible with a single image? In: Circuits and systems (ISCAS), Proceedings of 2010 IEEE international symposium on, pp 3425–3428Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang Z, Yan J, Liu S, Lei Z, Yi D, Li S (2012) A face antispoofing database with diverse attacks. In: Biometrics (ICB), 2012 5th IAPR international conference on, pp 26–31Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pavlidis I, Symosek P (2000) The imaging issue in an automatic face/disguise detection system. In: Computer vision beyond the visible spectrum: methods and applications, 2000. Proceedings of the IEEE workshop on, pp 15–24Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim Y, Na J, Yoon S, Yi J (2009) Masked fake face detection using radiance measurements. J Opt Soc Amer A 26(4)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    OSU thermal imagery database. http://www.cse.ohiostate.edu/otcbvs-bench/
  15. 15.
    Yi D, Lei Z, Hu Y, Li SZ (2013) Fast matching by 2 lines of code for large scale face recognition systems. CoRR abs/1302.7180Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li SZ, Chu R, Liao S, Zhang L (2007) Illumination invariant face recognition using near-infrared images. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 26(Special issue on biometrics: progress and directions)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Viola P, Jones M (2011) Robust real time object detection. IEEE ICCV workshop on statistical and computational theories of vision. Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper DH, Graham J (1995) Active shape models: their training and application. CVGIP: image underst 61:38–59Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fukunaga K (1990) Introduction to statistical pattern recognition, 2nd edn. Academic Press, BostonMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ahonen T, Hadid A, Pietikainen M (2004) Face recognition with local binary patterns. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision. Prague, Czech, pp 469–481Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yi D, Lei Z, Li SZ (2011) A robust eye localization method for low quality face images. In: International joint conference on biometrics (IJCB). Washington, pp 15–21Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saragih J, Lucey S, Cohn J (2011) Deformable model fitting by regularized landmark mean-shift. Int J Comput Vis 91:200–215CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Milborrow S, Morkel J, Nicolls F (2010) The MUCT landmarked face database. Pattern recognition association of South Africa (2010). Http://www.milbo.org/Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rother C, Kolmogorov V, Blake A (2004) Grabcut: interactive foreground extraction using iterated graph cuts. ACM Trans Graph 23(3):309–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Phillips PJ, Moon H, Rizvi SA, Rauss PJ (2000) The FERET evaluation methodology for face recognition algorithms 22(10):1090–1104Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Okada K, Steffens J, Maurer T, Hong H, Elagin E, Neven H, von der Malsburg C (1998) The Bochum/USC face recognition system and how it fared in the FERET phase III testGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Belhumeur P, Hespanha J, Kriegman D (1997) Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans PAMI 19(7):711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chinese Academy of SciencesInstitute of AutomationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations