Advertisement

Simulation and Training in Minimal Access Surgery

  • Alexander Harris
  • Fernando Bello
  • Roger Kneebone

Abstract

This chapter summarises the increasingly important role that simulation has to play in the training of surgeons in minimal access surgery.

This chapter defines commonly encountered terms from the simulation literature, describes the relevance of simulation to modern surgical practice, examines the evidence for and against the different types of simulators currently used in surgical simulation training, and considers the practicalities of adopting such an approach. The chapter concludes with an exploration of potential future directions in a rapidly evolving field.

Keywords

Surgical Simulation Surgical Simulators Fidelity Validity Reliability Virtual Reality Silicone Models Cadaveric Models (Animal and Human) Hybrid Models Physical and Temporal Context 

References

  1. 1.
    Gaba D. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Safe Health Care. 2004;13:i2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Med Educ. 2003;37:267–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brydges R, Carnahan H, Rose D, Rose L, Dubrowski A. Coordinating progressive levels of simulation fidelity to maximise educational benefit. Acad Med. 2010;85:806–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker S, Darzi A. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. Br Med J. 2003;327:1032–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ratanawongsa N, Thomas P, Marinopoulos S, Dorman T, Wilson L, Ashar B, et al. The reported validity and reliability of methods for evaluating continuing medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2008;83:274–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time. Official Journal L 299, 18/11/2003 P. 0009–0019.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tooke J. Final report of the independent inquiry into Modernising Medical Careers. MMC Inquiry. London: Aldridge Press. 2007. See http://www.mmcinquiry.org.uk/draft.htm.
  8. 8.
    Chikwe J, de Souza A, Pepper J. No time to train the surgeons. Br Med J. 2004;328:418–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grantcharov T, Reznick R. Training tomorrow’s surgeons: what are we looking for and how can we achieve it? ANZ J Surg. 2009;79:104–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Donaldson L. 150 years of the Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer. 2008 [10 Aug 2013]; Available from: webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/publicationsandstatistics/publications/annualreports/dh_096206.
  11. 11.
    Temple J. Time for Training. A review of the impact of the European Working Time Directive on the quality of training. 2010 [10 Aug 2013]; Available from: http://www.mee.nhs.uk/PDF/14274 Bookmark Web Version.pdf.
  12. 12.
    Aggarwal R, Darzi A. From scalpel to simulator: a surgical journey. Surgery. 2009;145:1–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choy I, Okrainec A. Simulation in surgery: perfecting the practice. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:457–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jakimowicz J, Cuschieri A. Time for evidence-based minimal access surgery training: simulate or sink. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1521–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Satava R. Surgical education and surgical simulation. World J Surg. 2001;25:1484–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sturm L, Windsor J, Cosman P, Cregan P, Hewett P, Maddern G. A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg. 2008;248:166–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Windsor J. Role of simulation in surgical education and training. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79:127–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McGaghie W, Issenberg S, Petrusa E, Scalese R. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ. 2010;44:50–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sutherland L, Middleton P, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, et al. Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2006;243:291–300.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Regehr G. Trends in medical education research. Acad Med. 2004;79:939–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Coleman J, Nduka C, Darzi A. Virtual reality and laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1709–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Undre S, Darzi A. Laparoscopy simulators. J Endourol. 2007;21:274–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson B. Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD006575.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilson M, Middlebrook A, Sutton C, Stone R, McCloy RMISTVR. A virtual reality trainer for laparoscopic surgery assesses performance. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79:403–4.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S, O’Brien M, Bansal V, Andersen D, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458–64.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Larsen C, Soerensen J, Grantcharov T, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, et al. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2009;338:b1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Catalyud D, Arora S, Aggarwal R, Kruglikova I, Schulze S, Funch-Jensen P, et al. Warm-up in a virtual reality environment improves performance in the operating room. Ann Surg. 2010;251:1181–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Andreatta P, Woodrum D, Birkmeyer J, Yellamanchilli R, Doherty G, Gauger P, et al. Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor Training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2006;243:854–60.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thompson J, Leonard A, Doarn C, Roesch M, Broderick T. Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1107–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Panait L, Akkary E, Bell R, Roberts K, Dudrick S, Duffy A. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. J Surg Res. 2009;156:312–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bashir G. Technology and medicine: the evolution of virtual reality simulation in laparoscopic training. Med Teach. 2010;32:558–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aucar J, Groch N, Troxel S, Eubanks S. A review of surgical simulation with attention to validation methodology. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005;15:82–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wyles S, Miskovic D, Ni Z, Acheson A, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Longman R, et al. Analysis of laboratory-based laparoscopic colorectal surgery workshops within the English National Training Programme. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1559–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Harris A. Distributed simulation and soft preserve cadavers in surgical simulation. Granada: SESAM; 2011.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ericsson K, Charness N, Feltovich P, Hoffman R, editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. Putting the expert together again. Med Educ. 2011;45:920–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rosen M, Hunt E, Pronovost P, Federowicz M, Weaver S. In situ simulation in continuing education for health care professions: a systematic review. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012;32:243–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kneebone R, Arora S, King D, Bello F, Sevdalis N, Kassab E, et al. Distributed simulation – accessible immersive training. Med Teach. 2010;32:65–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kassab E, Tun J, Arora S, King D, Ahmed K, Miskovic D, et al. “Blowing up the barriers” in surgical training: exploring and validating the concept of distributed simulation. Ann Surg. 2011;254:1059–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kassab E, Kyaw Tun J, Kneebone R. A novel approach to contextualized surgical simulation training. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:155–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Harris A, Kassab E, Tun JK, Kneebone R. Distributed Simulation in surgical training: an off-site feasibility study. Med Teach. 2013;35(4):e1078–81.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kneebone R. Simulation, safety and surgery. Qual Safe Health Care. 2010;19:i47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sachdeva A, Pellegrini C, Johnson K. Support for simulation-based surgical education through American College of Surgeons – Accredited Education Institutes. World J Surg. 2008;32:196–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chang L, Petros J, Hess D, Rotondi C, Babineau T. Integrating simulation into a surgical residency program: is voluntary participation effective? Surg Endosc. 2007;21:418–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Snyder C, Vandromme M, Tyra S, Hawn M. Proficiency-based laparoscopic and endoscopic training with virtual reality simulators: a comparison of proctored and independent approaches. J Surg Educ. 2009;66:201–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Swanstrom L, Fried G, Hoffman K, Soper N. Beta test results of a new system assessing competence in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:62–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Palter V, Orzech N, Reznick R, Grantcharov T. Validation of a structured training and assessment curriculum for technical skill acquisition in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013;257:224–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sweet R, Hananel D, Lawrenz F. A unified approach to validation, reliability, and education study design for surgical technical skills training. Arch Surg. 2010;145:197–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hanna G, Mavroveli S, Marchington S, Allen-Mersh T, Paice E, Standfield N. The feasibility and acceptability of integrating regular centralised laboratory-based skills training into a surgical training programme. Med Teach. 2012;34:e827–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Willaert W, Aggarwal R, Van Herzeele I, Cheshire N, Vermassen F. Recent advancements in medical simulation: patient-specific virtual reality simulation. World J Surg. 2012;36:1703–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Explore surgery. [10 Aug 2013]; Available from: http://www.exploresurgery.com.
  52. 52.
    Kneebone R, Woods A. Recapturing the history of surgical practice through simulation-based re-enactment. Med Hist. 2014;58:106–21.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Harris
    • 1
  • Fernando Bello
    • 1
  • Roger Kneebone
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Engagement and Simulation ScienceImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations