Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Imaging of Secondary Mitral Valve Regurgitation

  • Raluca Dulgheru
  • Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan
  • Khalil Fattouch
  • Mani Vannan
  • Patrizio Lancellotti
Chapter

Abstract

Many hypotheses regarding the mechanism of secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) have been made from 2D echocardiographic observations. Some have been confirmed and further developed with the help of 3D echocardiography (Otsuji et al., Circulation 96:1999–2008; Otsuji et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 37:641–8, 2001). 3D echocardiography, and especially 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), has much to offer in the evaluation of SMR, in addition to 2D echocardiography. First, it offers important information regarding MV geometry, giving insights into the mechanisms involved in the genesis of SMR in each patient. Second, it can improve the accuracy of MR quantification (Chandra et al., Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 301:H1015–24, 2011; Hyodo et al., J Am Coll Cardiol Img 5:669–76, 2012). Third, it can play an important role in the planning of surgery or percutaneous intervention.

Keywords

Catheter Attenuation Cardiol 

Supplementary material

Movie 5.1

3D Zoom mode acquisition of the mitral valve as seen from the atrial perspective (“surgeon’s view) by 3D transoesophageal echocardiography. The displayed image is then rotated in such a way that the aorta is located anteriorly. (AVI 5579 kb)

Movie 5.2

3D Zoom mode acquisition of the mitral valve as seen from the ventricular perspective by 3D transoesophageal echocardiography. The displayed image is then rotated in such a way that the anterior mitral leaflet is seen opening in diastole towards the interventricular septum, while the posterior leaflet is almost fixed during the cardiac cycle. (AVI 3927 kb)

313059_1_En_5_MOESM3_ESM.avi (3.5 mb)
Movie 5.3 Full Volume Color Flow Doppler Gated Acquisition with 3D transoesophageal echocardiography in a patient with ischemic mitral regurgitation and a centrally oriented regurgitation jet, indicative of symmetric tethering pattern. (AVI 3628 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Otsuji Y, Handschumacher M, Schwammenthal E, et al. Insights from three dimensional echocardiography into the mechanism of functional mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1997;96:1999–2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Otsuji Y, Hanschumacher MD, Liel-Cohen N, et al. Mechanism of ischemic mitral regurgitation with segmental left ventricular dysfunction: three-dimensional echocardiographic studies in models of acute and chronic progressive regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:641–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chandra S, Salgo I, Sugeng L, et al. A three-dimensional insight into the complexity of flow convergence in mitral regurgitation: adjunctive benefit of anatomic regurgitant orifice area. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;301:H1015–24.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hyodo E, Iwata S, Tugcu A, et al. Direct measurement of multiple vena contracta areas for assessing the severity of mitral regurgitation using 3D TEE. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2012;5:669–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watanabe N, Ogasawara Y, Yamaura Y, et al. Geometric deformity of the mitral annulus in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation: a real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic study. J Heart Valve Dis. 2005;14:447–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ahmad RM, Gillinov AM, McCarthy PM, et al. Annular geometry and motion in human ischemic mitral regurgitation: novel assessment with three-dimensional echocardiography and computer reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:2063–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watanabe N, Ogasawara Y, Yamaura Y, et al. Mitral annulus flattens in ischemic mitral regurgitation: geometric differences between inferior and anterior myocardial infarction. A real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic study. Circulation. 2005;112:I-458–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daimon M, Gillinov AM, Liddicoat JR, et al. Dynamic change in mitral annular area and motion during percutaneous mitral annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation: preliminary animal study with real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:381–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flachskampf F, Chandra S, Gaddipatti A, et al. Analysis of shape and motion of the mitral annulus in subjects with and without cardiomyopathy by echocardiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:277–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaput M, Handschumacher MD, Guerrero J, et al. Mitral leaflet adaptation to ventricular remodeling: prospective changes in a model of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2009;120(11 Suppl):S99–103.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saito K, Okura H, Watanabe N, et al. Influence of chronic tethering of the mitral valve on mitral leaflet size and coaptation in functional mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2012;5(4):337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen L, McCulloch A, May-Newman K. Nonhomogeneous deformation in the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32:1599–606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Otsuji Y, Kumanohoso T, Yoshifuku S, et al. Isolated annular dilation does not usually cause important functional mitral regurgitation: comparison between patients with lone atrial fibrillation and those with idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(10):1651–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lancellotti P, Moura L, Pierard LA, et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 2: mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (native valve disease). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:307–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marsan N, Westenberg J, Ypenburg C, et al. Quantification of functional mitral regurgitation by real-time 3D echocardiography: comparison with 3D velocity-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2009;2(11):1245–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yosefy C, Hung J, Chua S, et al. Direct measurement of vena contracta area by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography for assessing severity of mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104(7):978–83.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thavendiranathan P, Phelan D, Thomas J, et al. Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation: validation of new methods. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1470–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsumura Y, Fukuda S, Tran H, et al. Geometry of the proximal isovelocity surface area in mitral regurgitation by 3-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography: difference between functional mitral regurgitation and prolapse regurgitation. Am Heart J. 2008;155:231–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grady L, Datta S, Kutter O, et al. Regurgitation quantification using 3D PISA in volume echocardiography. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14(Pt 3):512–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thavendiranathan P, Liu S, Datta S, et al. Quantification of chronic functional mitral regurgitation by automated 3-dimensional peak and integrated proximal isovelocity surface area and stroke volume techniques using real-time 3-dimensional volume color Doppler echocardiography: in vitro and clinical validation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:125–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raluca Dulgheru
    • 1
  • Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan
    • 2
  • Khalil Fattouch
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mani Vannan
    • 2
  • Patrizio Lancellotti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiology, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart Valve ClinicUniversity of Liège, University Hospital Sart TilmanLiègeBelgium
  2. 2.Peter Munk Cardiac CenterUniversity Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations