Abstract
Models play an important role in solving decision problems. They are used to (i) analyse the effect of changes to decision variables on system performance (for example, the effect of different PM actions on system failures) and (ii) decide on the optimal values of decision variables to achieve some specified objectives (for example, optimum PM to minimise total maintenance costs).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Service time refers to the duration in the working state for a non-failed item.
- 2.
There are many books that discuss the modelling process in detail; see for example, Murthy et al. (1990) and the references cited therein.
- 3.
Appendix A [B] reviews material from probability theory [stochastic processes] that is relevant for reliability modelling.
- 4.
We will use both notations throughout the book.
- 5.
Expressions for the various distributions mentioned in this subsection can be found in Appendix A.
- 6.
We will be using calendar clock unless specifically some other clock (such as local, age) is indicated.
- 7.
The concept of minimal repair was first proposed by Barlow and Hunter (1961).
- 8.
For more on imperfect repair, see Pham and Wang (1996).
- 9.
- 10.
Nakagawa (2005) discusses several models based on this formulation.
- 11.
For more on CBM, see Williams et al. (1994).
- 12.
Kline (1984) suggests that the log-normal distribution is appropriate for modelling the repair times for many different products.
- 13.
For details of formulation and analysis of the two processes (NHPP and renewal) can be found in Appendix B.
- 14.
This is justified as, in general, the time for a repair/replacement ≪ time between events (CM or PM actions). However, if downtime is needed for determining penalty costs, then it needs to be modelled. However, it can be ignored for modelling subsequent failures as its impact is, in general, negligible.
- 15.
This is also known as the exponential law or the Cox-Lewis intensity function.
- 16.
- 17.
For a proof of this, see Nakagawa and Kowada (1983)
- 18.
See Blischke and Murthy (1994) for more details.
- 19.
This expression is used as the objective function to determine the optimal decision variable \( \nu \) if the goal is to minimise the asymptotic cost per unit time.
- 20.
For notational ease, we omit the parameters of the functions.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
References
Ascher H, Feingold H (1984) Repairable system reliability. Marcel Dekker, New York
Baik J, Murthy DNP, Jack N (2004) Two-dimensional failure modelling and minimal repair. Naval Res Logistics 51:345–362
Baik J, Murthy DNP, Jack N (2006) Erratum: two-dimensional failure modelling with minimal repair. Naval Res Logistics 53:115–116
Barlow RE, Hunter L (1961) Optimum preventive maintenance policies. Oper Res 8:90–100
Blischke WR, Murthy DNP (1994) Warranty cost analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York
Blischke WR, Karim MR, Murthy DNP (2011) Warranty data collection and analysis. Springer, London
Doyen L, Gaudoin O (2004) Classes of imperfect repair models based on reduction of failure intensity or virtual age. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 84:45–56
Hunter JJ (1974a) Renewal theory in two dimensions: basic results. Adv Appl Probab 6:376–391
Hunter JJ (1974b) Renewal theory in two dimensions: asymptotic results. Adv Appl Probab 6:376–391
Hunter JJ (1996) Mathematical techniques for warranty analysis. In: Blischke WR, Murthy DNP (eds) Product warranty hand book. Marcel Dekker, New York
Hutchinson TP, Lai CD (1990) Continuous bivariate distributions, emphasizing applications. Rumsby Scientific Publishing, Adelaide
Johnson NL, Kotz S (1972) Distributions in statistics: continuous multivariate distributions. Wiley, New York
Kijima M (1989) Some results for repairable systems with general repair. J Appl Probab 26:89–102
Kline MB (1984) Suitability of the lognormal distribution for corrective maintenance repair times. Reliab Eng 9:65–80
Kumar D, Klefsjo B (1994) Proportional hazards model: a review. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 29:177–188
Mahon BH, Bailey RJM (1975) A proposed improved replacement policy for army vehicles. Oper Res Q 26:477–494
Murthy DNP, Page NW, Rodin Y (1990) Mathematical modelling. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England
Murthy DNP, Xie M, Jiang R (2003) Weibull models. Wiley, New York
Nakagawa T (2005) Maintenance theory of reliability. Springer, London
Nakagawa T, Kowada M (1983) Analysis of a system with minimal repair and its application to a replacement policy. Eur J Oper Res 12:253–257
Nelson W (1990) Accelerated testing. Wiley, New York
Pham H, Wang H (1996) Imperfect maintenance. Eur J Oper Res 94:425–438
Rigdon SE, Basu AP (2000) Statistical methods for the reliability of repairable systems. Wiley, New York
Williams JH, Davies A, Drake PR (1994) Condition based maintenance and machine diagnostics. Chapman and Hall, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murthy, D.N.P., Jack, N. (2014). Modelling and Analysis of Degradation and Maintenance. In: Extended Warranties, Maintenance Service and Lease Contracts. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6440-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6440-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6439-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6440-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)