Advertisement

From Theory to Practice

  • Kris M. Y. Law
  • Marko Kesti
Chapter

Abstract

System intelligence competencies are interrelated and mutually interactive. In this interaction, positive spiral, the management supports the leadership and the culture. The leadership builds the team culture and promote on the personal working know-how. Shared cultural values contribute good cooperation within the team that speeds up the skills improvement and positively affects to the processes. Good personal know-how helps to describe processes and provide helpful initiatives for the management. From effective processes, the management receives high quality information for decision making, and the clear processes help leadership.

Keywords

Human Capital Staff Turnover Staff Cost Overtime Work Double Loop Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Argyris C. (1985). Strategy, Change and Defensive Routines, Pitman, Boston.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Argyris C. and Schon D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Festinger L. (1954). A theory of social comparison process. Human Relations 1954, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goleman D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence, A Bantam Book, USA.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hassard J. and Kelemen M. (2002). Production and consumption in organizational knowledge: the case of the ‘paradigms debate’, Organization, 9(2), 331–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kesti M. 2010. Strategic Human Capital Management. Talentum Publishing. Finland.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kesti M. (2012). The tacit signal method in human competence based organization performance development, Lapland University press, Rovaniemi.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Latane B. and Darley J. M. (1969). Bystander "apathy". American Scientist 1969. 57, 244–268.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mullins L. J. (2005). Management and Organisational Behaviour, Pearson Education Limited. England.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nonaka I. and Konno N. (1998). ‘The concept of ‘Ba’: building a foundation for knowledge creation’, California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press. New York.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Senge P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline, Doubleday. USA.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Totterdill P., Dhondt S. and Milsome S. (2002). Partners at Work? A Report to Europe’s Policy Makers and Social Partners, D G Research of the European Commission under the Competitive and Sustainable Growth: Accompanying Measures Programme.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tuckman, B. W. (1965). ‘Development Sequency in Small Groups’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 63, pp. 384–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weick K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations, Sage Publications, Inc. USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloon, Hong KongChina
  2. 2.University of LaplandLaplandFinland

Personalised recommendations