Advertisement

Introduction

  • J. S. ShrimptonEmail author
  • S. Haeri
  • Stephen J. Scott
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

Multi-phase flows are encountered in many engineering and environmental systems. For example, controlling combustion to enable efficient fuel consumption is only possible by understanding the atomization, dispersion, and evaporation processes of fuel droplets in the combustion system.

Keywords

Large Eddy Simulation Direct Numerical Simulation Slug Flow Annular Flow Stochastic Differential Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Gorokhovski M, Herrmann M (2008) Modeling primary atomization. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40:343–366CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crowe C (2000) On models for turbulence modulation in fluid/particle flows. Int J Multiphase Flow 26:719–727CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scott SJ, Karnik AU, Shrimpton JS (2009) On the quantification of preferential accumulation. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 30:789–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shaw R (2003) Particle-turbulence interactions in atmospheric clouds. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35:183–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shrimpton J (2003) Pulsed charged sprays: application ro disi engines during early injection. Int J Numer Meth Eng 58:513–536CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feath G (1983) Evaporation and combustion in sprays. IEEE Trans 1A–19:754–758Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grace J (1986) Contacting modes and behaviour classification of gas-solid and other two-phase suspensions. Can J of Chem Eng 64:1953–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gidaspow (1994) Multiphase flow and fluidization. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geldart D (1973) Types of gas fluidization. Powder Technol 7:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clift R, Grace J, Weber M (1978) Bubbles, drops and particles. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bi HT, Grace JR (1995) Flow regime diagrams for gas-solid fluidization and upward transport. Int J Multiphase Flow 21:1229–1236CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bi HT, Grace JR, Lim KS (1995) Transition from bubbling to turbulent fluidization. Ind Eng Chem Res 34:4003–4008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mandhane M, Gregory GA, Aziz K (1974) A flow pattern map for gas-liquid flow in horizontal pipes. Int J Multiphase Flow 1:537–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beggs D, Brill J (1973) A study of two-phase flow in inclined pipes. J Petrol Technol 25: 607–617Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu J, Cheng P, Zhao T (1999) Gas liquid two-phase flow regimes in rectangular channels with mini/micro gaps. Int J Multiphase Flow 25:411–432CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Furukawa T, Fukano T (2001) Effect of lquid viscosity on flow patterns in vertical upward gas-liquid two-phase flow. Int J Multiphase Flow 27:1109–1126CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taitel Y, Bornea D, Dukler AE (1980) Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas-liquid flow in vertical tubes. AIChE J 26:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barnea D, Shoham O, Taitel Y, Dukler AE (1980) Flow pattern transition for gas-liquid flow in horizontal and inclined pipes. Int J Multiphase Flow 6:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu Y, Yang W, Wang J (2008) Experimental study for the stratified to slug flow regime transition mechanism of gas-oil two-phase flow in horizontal pipe. Frontiers Energy Power Eng China 2:152–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pantzali M, Mouza A, Paras S (2008) Counter-current gas-liquid flow and incipient flooding in inclined small diameter tubes. Chem Eng Sci 63:3966–3978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dyment A, Boudlal A (2004) A theoretical model for gas-liquid slug flow in down inclined ducts. Int J Multiphase Flow 30:521–550CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zapke A, Krger DG (2000) Countercurrent gas-liquid flow in inclined and vertical ducts-i: flow patterns, pressure drop characteristics and flooding. Int J Multiphase Flow 26:1439–1455CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grolman E, Fortuin JMH (1997) Gas-liquid flow in slightly inclined pipes. Chem Eng Sci 52:4461–4471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Riley JJ, Patterson GS (1974) Diffusion experiements with numerically integrated isotropic turbulence. Phys Fluids 17:292–297CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rogallo R (1981) Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence. Technical Report 81315, NASAGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Squires K, Eaton J (1990) Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Phys Fluids 3:1169–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Squires K, Eaton J (1991) Measurements of particle dispersion obtained from direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence. J Fluid Mech 226:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Squires K, Eaton J (1991) Lagrangian and eulerian statistics obtained from direct numerical simulations of homogeneous turbulence. Phys Fluids 3:130–143CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eaton J (2009) Two-way coupled turbulence simulations of gas-particle flows using point-particle tracking. Int J Multiphase Flow 35:792–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Elghobashi S, Truesdell G (1992) Direct simulation of particle dispersion in decaying isotropic turbulence. J Fluid Mech 242:655–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Elghobashi S, Truesdell G (1993) On the two-way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and dispersed solid particles part 1: turbulence modification. Phys Fluids A5:1790–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boivin M, Simonin O, Squires KD (1998) Direct numerical simulation of turbulence modulation by particles in isotropic turbulence. J Fluid Mech 375:235–263CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lavieville J, Deutsch E, Simonin O (1995) Large eddy simulation of interactions between colliding particles and a homogeneous isotropic turbulence field. gas-particle flows. ASME 228:359–369Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang Q, Squires K, Chen H, McLaughlin J (1997) On the role of the lift force in turbulence simulations of particle deposition. Int J Multiphase Flow 23:749–763CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Haeri S, Shrimpton J (2012) On the application of immersed boundary, fictitious domain and body-conformal mesh methods to many particle multiphase flows. Int J Multiphase Flow 40:38–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Haeri S, Shrimpton J (2013) A correlation for the calculation of the local nusselt number around circular cylinders in the range 10 \(\le \) re \(\le \) 250 and 0.1 \(\le \) pr \(\le \) 40. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 59:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haeri S, Shrimpton J (2013) A new implicit fictitious domain method for the simulation of flow in complex geometries with heat transfer. J Comput Phys 237:21–45CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and the EnvironmentUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  3. 3.YorkUK

Personalised recommendations