Abstract
Design theory is the body of knowledge that provides an understanding of the principles, practices, and procedures of design. That knowledge leads to hypotheses on how designers should work, which constitute the basis of the prescriptive part of design methodology. Decision making is one of the central design activities, and has been predominantly conceptualized as a structured, explicit, and rational thinking process in the literature. From this knowledge, various decision support methods have been developed. However, there is rich empirical evidence highlighting unconscious and mainly inaccessible processes that allow the designer to make quick and often effective decisions without building on explicit rationale. Given designers construct, apply, and internalize knowledge in a variety of different situations and time frames in their daily work, advocating the use of explicit and structured processes in all situations seems unrealistic. This claim implies that comprehensive design theories need to take into account unconscious processes such as intuition. From a methodological perspective, design methods should acknowledge the designer’s need to rely on intuition in certain situations—especially under time pressure. At a more advanced level, design methods should support the designer in assessing the limitations and benefits of utilizing intuitive approaches. In order to broaden the mono-disciplinary view, it would be beneficial to utilize knowledge from other disciplines such as relevant findings of neurophysiological research on the processes of the unconscious. For instance, in the early 1990s, neurophysiologists identified a group of nerve cells that are responsible for transmitting a signal when the brain detects an error before the person is even aware of the error. Connecting this type of information with the world of the designer might lead to advances in how designers relate to and manage their own processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ahmed S, Wallace KM, Blessing LT (2003) Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Res Eng Des 14:1–11
Badke-Schaub P, Daalhuizen J, Roozenburg N (2011) Towards a designer-centred methodology: descriptive considerations and prescriptive reflections. In: Birkhofer H (ed) The future of design methodology. Springer, London
Cross N (1999) Natural intelligence in design. Des Stud 20(1):25–39
Cross N (2004) Expertise in design: an overview. Des Stud 25(5):427–441
Dane E, Pratt MG (2007) Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad Manag Rev 32(1):33–54
Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (1986) Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Blackwell, Oxford
Evans J. St. BT (1984) Heuristic and analytic processing in reasoning. Br J Psychol 75:451–468
Evans J (2003) In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends Cognit Sci 7:10
Evans J (2012) Questions and challenged for the new psychology of reasoning. Think Reason 18:5–31
Freud S (1953) The interpretation of dreams. In: Strachey J (Ed. & Trans.) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vols 4 and 5. Hogarth (Original work published 1900), London
Gigerenzer G (2007) Gut feelings. Penguin Books, London
Gunther J, Ehrlenspiel K (1999) Comparing designers from practice and designers with systematic design education. Des Stud 20(5):439–451
James W (1950) The principles of psychology. Dover. Original work published 1890), New York
Heiman GW (2002) Research methods in psychology, 3rd edn. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston & New York
Hermanns W (1983) Albert Einstein, Einstein and the poet: in search of the cosmic man. Brandon Books, Brookline
Hubka V, Eder WE (1988) Theory of technical systems; a total concept theory for engineering design. Springer, Berlin (Translation of V. Hubka, Theorie Technischer Systeme. Berlin: Springer, 1984)
Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice. Am Psychol 58:697–720
Khatri N, Ng HA (2000) The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Hum Relat 53(1):57–86
Klein G (2003) The power of intuition: How to use your gut feelings to make better decisions at work. Random House Digital, Inc
Rittel H, Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4:155–169 (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Inc, Amsterdam)
Pascal B (1958) Pensees, intro. TS Eliot, New York, Dutton
Sadler-Smith E (2008) The role of intuition in collective learning and the development of shared meaning. Adv Dev Hum Resour 10(4): 494–508
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York
Simon HA (1972) Theories of bounded rationality. Decision and organization 1:161–176
Simon HA (1973) The structure of ill-structured problems. Artif Intell 4:181–201
Sloman SA (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol Bull 119:3–22
Stanovich KE, West RF (2000) Individual difference in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav Brain Sci 23:645–726
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognit Psychol 42:207–232
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 27:1124–1131
Vaughan FE (1979) Awakening intuition. Doubleday, New York
Visser W (2009) Design: one but in different forms. Des Stud 30:187–222
Webster Online (2013). http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definitions/intuition
Wessel J, Danielmeier C, Morton JB, Ullsperger M (2012) Surprise and error: common neuronal architecture for the processing of errors and novelty. J Neurosci 32:7528–7537
Yang MC (2005) A study of prototypes, design activity, and design outcome. Design Studies 26(6): 649–669
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the industrial design engineering master’s students of the DTM course at Delft University of Technology, who helped to collect the data referenced in the empirical dimension of this work. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their valuable feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Badke-Schaub, P., Eris, O. (2014). A Theoretical Approach to Intuition in Design: Does Design Methodology Need to Account for Unconscious Processes?. In: Chakrabarti, A., Blessing, L. (eds) An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6337-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6338-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)