Skip to main content

A Theoretical Approach to Intuition in Design: Does Design Methodology Need to Account for Unconscious Processes?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Design theory is the body of knowledge that provides an understanding of the principles, practices, and procedures of design. That knowledge leads to hypotheses on how designers should work, which constitute the basis of the prescriptive part of design methodology. Decision making is one of the central design activities, and has been predominantly conceptualized as a structured, explicit, and rational thinking process in the literature. From this knowledge, various decision support methods have been developed. However, there is rich empirical evidence highlighting unconscious and mainly inaccessible processes that allow the designer to make quick and often effective decisions without building on explicit rationale. Given designers construct, apply, and internalize knowledge in a variety of different situations and time frames in their daily work, advocating the use of explicit and structured processes in all situations seems unrealistic. This claim implies that comprehensive design theories need to take into account unconscious processes such as intuition. From a methodological perspective, design methods should acknowledge the designer’s need to rely on intuition in certain situations—especially under time pressure. At a more advanced level, design methods should support the designer in assessing the limitations and benefits of utilizing intuitive approaches. In order to broaden the mono-disciplinary view, it would be beneficial to utilize knowledge from other disciplines such as relevant findings of neurophysiological research on the processes of the unconscious. For instance, in the early 1990s, neurophysiologists identified a group of nerve cells that are responsible for transmitting a signal when the brain detects an error before the person is even aware of the error. Connecting this type of information with the world of the designer might lead to advances in how designers relate to and manage their own processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmed S, Wallace KM, Blessing LT (2003) Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Res Eng Des 14:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  2. Badke-Schaub P, Daalhuizen J, Roozenburg N (2011) Towards a designer-centred methodology: descriptive considerations and prescriptive reflections. In: Birkhofer H (ed) The future of design methodology. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cross N (1999) Natural intelligence in design. Des Stud 20(1):25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cross N (2004) Expertise in design: an overview. Des Stud 25(5):427–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dane E, Pratt MG (2007) Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad Manag Rev 32(1):33–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (1986) Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Evans J. St. BT (1984) Heuristic and analytic processing in reasoning. Br J Psychol 75:451–468

    Google Scholar 

  8. Evans J (2003) In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends Cognit Sci 7:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans J (2012) Questions and challenged for the new psychology of reasoning. Think Reason 18:5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Freud S (1953) The interpretation of dreams. In: Strachey J (Ed. & Trans.) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vols 4 and 5. Hogarth (Original work published 1900), London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gigerenzer G (2007) Gut feelings. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gunther J, Ehrlenspiel K (1999) Comparing designers from practice and designers with systematic design education. Des Stud 20(5):439–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. James W (1950) The principles of psychology. Dover. Original work published 1890), New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heiman GW (2002) Research methods in psychology, 3rd edn. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston & New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hermanns W (1983) Albert Einstein, Einstein and the poet: in search of the cosmic man. Brandon Books, Brookline

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hubka V, Eder WE (1988) Theory of technical systems; a total concept theory for engineering design. Springer, Berlin (Translation of V. Hubka, Theorie Technischer Systeme. Berlin: Springer, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice. Am Psychol 58:697–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khatri N, Ng HA (2000) The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Hum Relat 53(1):57–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klein G (2003) The power of intuition: How to use your gut feelings to make better decisions at work. Random House Digital, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rittel H, Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4:155–169 (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Inc, Amsterdam)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pascal B (1958) Pensees, intro. TS Eliot, New York, Dutton

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sadler-Smith E (2008) The role of intuition in collective learning and the development of shared meaning. Adv Dev Hum Resour 10(4): 494–508

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Simon HA (1972) Theories of bounded rationality. Decision and organization 1:161–176

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simon HA (1973) The structure of ill-structured problems. Artif Intell 4:181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sloman SA (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol Bull 119:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stanovich KE, West RF (2000) Individual difference in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav Brain Sci 23:645–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognit Psychol 42:207–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 27:1124–1131

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vaughan FE (1979) Awakening intuition. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Visser W (2009) Design: one but in different forms. Des Stud 30:187–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Webster Online (2013). http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definitions/intuition

  33. Wessel J, Danielmeier C, Morton JB, Ullsperger M (2012) Surprise and error: common neuronal architecture for the processing of errors and novelty. J Neurosci 32:7528–7537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang MC (2005) A study of prototypes, design activity, and design outcome. Design Studies 26(6): 649–669

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the industrial design engineering master’s students of the DTM course at Delft University of Technology, who helped to collect the data referenced in the empirical dimension of this work. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their valuable feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozgur Eris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Badke-Schaub, P., Eris, O. (2014). A Theoretical Approach to Intuition in Design: Does Design Methodology Need to Account for Unconscious Processes?. In: Chakrabarti, A., Blessing, L. (eds) An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6337-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6338-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics