Skip to main content

Abdominal Wall Transplant Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

The application of composite tissue allograft (CTA) transplants in clinical reconstruction is parallel with extended knowledge of anatomy, microsurgical skills and development of transplantation immunology. CTAs are composed of multiple tissues, some of which such as skin are highly immunogenic and cause strong immunologic responses. Strong antigenic nature of skin may be related to Langerhans cells, which are powerful antigen-presenting cells. They are leukocytes found in the epidermis as members of immunologic cascade. Large skin components of CTA transplant may cause higher antigenic load as a result of increased surface area of transplanted skin correlating with increased load of Langerhans cells. In clinical abdominal wall transplants, increased rejection episodes were reported compared with other CTA transplant. This complication may correlate to large skin component of these transplants. To evaluate correlation between large skin island flaps and immunologic responses, CTA models with large skin components should be tested in experimental studies. Here we propose a total abdominal wall (TAW) transplant model in rat to test the feasibility of TAW transplantation in two groups: the anatomic study and experimental transplantation group. In anatomic study, TAW flaps were elevated bilaterally on superficial epigastric vessels and replaced. The entire TAW skin islands of all flaps were viable at postoperative day 21. Dye study confirmed that TAW flap was supplied by two vascular pedicles. Data in this group demonstrated that this flap is composed of the largest skin island when compared with other CTA transplant models such as full face, hemiface, limb, and groin flap. In experimental group, isograft transplantations were performed between Lewis rats (RT11) while allograft transplantations were performed Lewis (RT11) donors and LBN (RT11+n) recipients.

All TAW transplants showed viable islands at posttransplant day 200 under cyclosporine A monotherapy protocol. Microangiography of the transplant demonstrated entire skin island was supplied bilaterally by superficial epigastric vessels pedicle. Dye studies with India ink demonstrated dye uptake in all flap components. Histologic examination also demonstrated the viability of flap tissues. High chimerism levels in peripheral blood was determined at the 7th, 21st, 35th, 63rd, and 100th posttransplant days was compared with full face, hemiface, groin flap data. It was found that TAW transplant had higher chimerism level compared with groin flap but lower chimerism than full face and hemiface allografts. TAW transplant may serve as a new experimental model with large skin component and may be useful to determine immunologic responses to tissues with high antigenic load under different immunosuppressive protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Levi DM, Tzakis AG, Kato T, et al. Transplantation of the abdominal wall. Lancet. 2003;36:2173–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cipriani R, Contedini F, Santoli M, et al. Abdominal wall transplantation with microsurgical technique. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:1304–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hettiaratchy S, Melendy E, Randolph MA, et al. Tolerance to composite tissue allografts across a major histocompatibility barrier in miniature swine. Transplantation. 2004;77:514–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourget JL, Mathes DW, Nielsen GP, et al. Tolerance to musculoskel-etal allografts with transient lymphocyte chimerism in miniature swine. Transplantation. 2001;71:851–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee AWP, Yaremchuk MJ, Pan YC, et al. Relative antigenicity of components of a vascularized limb allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:401–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buttemeyer R, Jones NF, Min Z, et al. Rejection of the component tissues of limb allografts in rats immunosuppressed with FK-506 and cyclosporine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:139–48. discussion 149–151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council. Guide for the care and Use of laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Demir Y, Ozmen S, Klimczak A, et al. Tolerance induction in composite facial allograft transplantation in the rat model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1790–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siemionow M, Demir Y, Mukerjee A, Klimczak A. Development and maintenance of donor specific chimerism in semi-allogenic and fully mhc mismatched facial allograft transplants. Transplantation. 2005;79:558–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Selvaggi G, Levi DM, Kato T, et al. Expanded use of transplantation techniques: abdominal wall transplantation and intestinal autotransplan- tation. Transplant Proc. 2004;36:1561–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanitakis J, Jullien D, Petruzzo P, et al. Immunohistologic studies of the skin of human hand allografts: our experience with two patients. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:1722.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Romani N, Holzmann S, Tripp CH, et al. Langerhans cells-dendritic cells of the epidermis. APMIS. 2003;111:725–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers NJ, Lechler RI. Allorecognition. Am J Transplant. 2001;1:97–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Womer KL, Sayegh MH, Auchincloss Jr H. Involvement of the direct and indirect pathways of allorecognition in tolerance induction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;356:639–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Strauch B, Murray DE. Transfer of composite graft with immediate suture anastomosis of its vascular pedicle measuring less than 1 mm in external diameter using microsurgical techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;40:325–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang F, Lineaweaver WC, Kao S, et al. Microvascular transfer of the rectus abdominis muscle and myocutaneous flap in rats. Microsurgery. 1993;14:420–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozgentas HE, Shenaq S, Spira M. Development of a TRAM flap model in the rat and study of vascular dominance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94:1012–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang F, Sones WD, Lineaweaver WC. Microsurgical flap models in the rat. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2001;17:211–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ulusal BG, Ulusal AE, Ozmen S, et al. A new composite facial and scalp transplantation model in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1302–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nasır S, Bozkurt M, Klimczak A et al. Comparison of flap versus graft transplantation immunology. 52nd annual meeting of the plastic surgery research council, 20–23 June 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serdar Nasır MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nasır, S. (2015). Abdominal Wall Transplant Models. In: Siemionow, M. (eds) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6335-0_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6335-0_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6334-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6335-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics