Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Representation of Texture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crystallographic Texture of Materials

Part of the book series: Engineering Materials and Processes ((EMP))

Abstract

As has been stated already, texture of a rolled sheet material is commonly represented as {hkl} 〈uvw〉, which means that most of the grains in the sheet material are such that their {hkl} planes are nearly parallel to the rolling plane and the 〈uvw〉 directions of the grains are nearly parallel to the rolling direction. In practice, however, it may so happen that in a rolled sheet, a number of grains have their {h 1 k 1 l 1} planes parallel to the rolling plane and their 〈u 1 v 1 w 1〉 directions parallel to the rolling direction; another few grains may have their {h 2 k 2 l 2} planes parallel to the rolling plane and their 〈u 2 v 2 w 2〉 directions parallel to the rolling direction and so on. In that case, we say that the texture of the sheet material has a few components represented by {h 1 k 1 l 1} 〈u 1 v 1 w 1〉, {h 2 k 2 l 2} 〈u 2 v 2 w 2〉···, and so on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Casato JC, Fricke WG (1987) Orientations of the Cubic Unit Cell and Tetrahedron. Textures Microstruct 7:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Partridge P (1967) The crystallography and deformation modes of hexagonal close-packed metals. Int Mater Rev 12:169–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ray RK, Jonas JJ (1990) Transformation textures in steels. Int Mater Rev 35:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunge HJ (1965) Zur darstellung allgemeiner texturen. Z Metallkd 56:872–874

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roe RJ (1965) Description of crystallite orientation in polycrystalline materials. III. General solution to pole figure inversion. J Appl Phys 36:2024–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams RO (1968) Analytical methods for representing complex textures by biaxial pole figures. J Appl Phys 39:4329–4335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams RO (1968) Representation of textures of rolled copper brass and aluminum by biaxial pole figures. Trans Metall Soc AIME 242:105

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bunge H (1987) Three-dimensional texture analysis. Int Mater Rev 32:265–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bunge HJ, Morris PR (1982) Texture analysis in materials science: mathematical methods. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pospiech J, Jura J (1974) Determination of orientation distribution function from incomplete pole figures. Z Metall 65:324–330

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner F, Bechlerferry E (1982) A generalized library program for texture calculations with even and odd coefficients. J Appl Crystallogr 15:122–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansen J, Pospiech J, Lücke K (1978) Tables for texture analysis of cubic crystals. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Bunge HJ, Esling C (1979) Determination of the odd part of the texture function. J Phys Lett 40:627–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Esling C, Bechlerferry E, Bunge HJ (1981) Numerical-calculation of the odd part of the texture function. J Phys Lett 42:141–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van HP (1983) The use of a quadratic form for the determination of nonnegative texture functions. Textures Microstruct 6:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahms M, Bunge HJ (1988) A positivity method for the determination of complete orientation distribution functions. Textures Microstruct 10:21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dahms M, Bunge HJ (1989) The iterative series-expansion method for quantitative texture analysis.1. Gen Outline J Appl Crystallogr 22:439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang F, Xu JZ, Liang ZD (1989) Determination of the ODF of hexagonal symmetry materials according to the maximum-entropy method. Textures Microstruct 10:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang F, Xu JZ, Liang ZD (1992) Determination of the complete ODF of cubic system materials by the maximum-entropy method. Textures Microstruct 19:55–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schaeben H, Fundenberger JJ (1994) Particular solutions of the PDF-to-ODF inversion problem of texture analysis by large-scale mathematical programming. J Appl Crystallogr 27:177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schaeben H, Siemes H (1996) Determination and interpretation of preferred orientation with texture goniometry: An application of indicators to maximum entropy pole- to orientation-density inversion. Math Geol 28:169–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lucke K, Pospiech J, Virnich KH, Jura J (1981) On the problem of the reproduction of the true orientation distribution from pole figures. Acta Metall 29:167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lucke K, Pospiech J, Jura J, Hirsch J (1986) On the presentation of orientation distribution functions by model functions. Z Metall 77:312–321

    Google Scholar 

  24. Imhof J (1977) Determination of an approximation of orientation distribution function using one pole figure. Z Metall 68:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  25. Matthies S, Vinel GW (1982) On the reproduction of the orientation distribution function of texturized samples from reduced pole figures using the conception of a conditional ghost correction. Physica Status Solidi (B) 112:111–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Matthies S, Vinel GW (1982) An example demonstrating a new reproduction method of the ODF of texturized samples from reduced pole figures. Physica Status Solidi (B) 112:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruer D, Baro R (1977) Vectorial method of texture analysis of cubic lattice polycrystalline material. J Appl Crystallogr 10:458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vadon A, Heizmann JJ (1991) A new program to calculate the texture vector for the vector method. Textures Microstruct 14:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Helming K, Eschner T (1990) A new approach to texture analysis of multiphase materials using a texture component model. Crys Res Tech 25:203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pawlik K (1986) Determination of the orientation distribution function from pole figures in arbitrarily defined cells. Physica Status Solidi (B) 134:477–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pawlik K, Pospiech J, Lucke K (1991) The ODF approximation from pole figures with the aid of the ADC method. Textures Microstruct 14:25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kocks UF, Tome CN, Wenk HR (1998) Texture and anisotropy: preferred orientations in polycrystals and their effects on materials properties. Cambridge University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ray RK, Jonas JJ, Hook RE (1994) Cold rolling and annealing textures in low carbon and extra low carbon steels. Int Mater Rev 39:129–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hirsch J, Lücke K (1988) Overview no. 76: mechanism of deformation and development of rolling textures in polycrystalline fcc metals—I. Description of rolling texture development in homogeneous CuZn alloys. Acta Metall 36:2863–2882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ghosh Chowdhury S, Ray RK, Jena A (2000) Texture evolution during recrystallization in a boron-doped Ni76Al24 alloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 277:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chowdhury SG, Ray RK, Jena AK (1998) Rolling texture in the intermetallic compound Ni76Al24(B). Mater Sci Eng, A 246:289–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

    Satyam Suwas

  2. Research and Devlopement, Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., Jamshedpur, India

    Ranjit Kumar Ray

Authors
  1. Satyam Suwas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ranjit Kumar Ray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satyam Suwas .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suwas, S., Ray, R.K. (2014). Representation of Texture. In: Crystallographic Texture of Materials. Engineering Materials and Processes. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6314-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation