Advertisement

Advanced Transport Systems: Technologies and Environment

  • Milan JanićEmail author
Chapter
  • 2.6k Downloads

Abstract

This chapter deals with the performances of advanced passenger cars, large advanced container ships, and LH2 (Liquid Hydrogen)-fuelled commercial air transportation.

Keywords

Energy Efficiency Fuel Consumption International Maritime Organization Container Ship Related Emission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AECOM. (2012). NC maritime strategy: Vessel size vs. cost. Prepared for the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Architecture, Engineering, Consulting, Operations and Maintenance Los Angeles, California, USA.Google Scholar
  2. AIRBUS. (2006). Airbus global market forecast. Toulouse: Airbus Industrie.Google Scholar
  3. An, P., Sauer, A. (2004). Comparison of passenger vehicle fuel economy and GHG emission standards around the world. Arlington: World Resource Institute, New Center for Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, D. (2008). The long thaw: How humans are changing the next 100,000 years of earth’s climate. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  5. Bodek, K., & Heywood, J. (2008). Europe’s evolving passenger vehicle fleet: Fuel use and GHG emissions scenarios through 2035. Cambridge: Laboratory for Energy and Environment, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).Google Scholar
  6. Boeing. (2007). Current market outlook 2007: How will you travel through life? Seattle: Boeing Commercial Airplanes.Google Scholar
  7. Bossel, U., Eliasson, B. (2003). Energy and the hydrogen economy. Baden-Dattwil: Report ABB Switzerland Ltd. Corporate Research.Google Scholar
  8. Brewer, G. D. (1991). Hydrogen aircraft technology. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cambell, C. J. (2002). Peak oil: An outlook on crude oil depletion. Retrieved from http://www.greatchange.org/ov-campbell,outlook.html
  10. Chen, C., & Ren, Y. (2010). Exploring the relationship between vehicle safety and fuel efficiency in automotive design. Transportation Research D, 15(2), 112–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chevron, (2006), Alternative jet fuels, addendum 1 to aviation fuels technical reviews (FTR-3/A1), Chevron Corporation, USA.Google Scholar
  12. CGI. (2007). Container terminal parameters: A white paper. Prepared for Marine Department of Transportation, The Cornell Group, Inc., Fairfax.Google Scholar
  13. Chi, G., Stone, B. Jr. (2005) Sustainable transport planning: Estimating the ecological footprint of vehicle travel in future years. ASCE Journal of Urban Planning and Development, September, 170–180.Google Scholar
  14. Churchill, J., Johnson, B. (2012). Saving billions on bunkers. Maersk Post. May 2012, pp. 9–12.Google Scholar
  15. Coelho, M. C., & Luzia, M. B. (2010). Evaluating the energy performance of a SUV hybrid electric vehicle. Transportation Research D, 15(8), 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corchero, G., Montanes, J. l. (2005). An approach to use hydrogen for commercial aircraft engines. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 219G, 35–44.Google Scholar
  17. Cullinane, K., & Khanna, M. (2000). Economies of scale in large containerships: Optimal size and geographical implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 8(3), 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daggett, L. D., Hebdicks, L. C., Walhter, R., Corporan, E. (2006). Alternate fuels and their potential impact on aviation, NASA/TM-2006-214365. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Glenn Research Centre, Ohio, USA.Google Scholar
  19. DeLuchi, M. A. (1989). Hydrogen vehicles: An evaluation of fuel storage, performance, safety, Environmental impact, and costs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 14(2), 81–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DNV. (2012). What is the optimum speed for a 20kTEU container ship? Container Ship Update, 1, 15–16.Google Scholar
  21. DSC. (2010). Container freight rate insight: Bi-monthly pricing benchmarks on the CONTAINER market. London: Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Eberhard, M., & Tarpening, M. (2006). The 21st century electric car. Paolo Alto: Tesla Motors Inc., Tesla North America.Google Scholar
  23. EC. (2003). Liquid hydrogen fuelled aircraft- system analysis (CRYOPLANE). European Commission, 5th R&D Framework Program (Growth 1998–2002), Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  24. EC. (2010a). Energy, transport, and environment indicators, EUROSTAT, Statistical books, European Commission, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  25. EC. (2010b). EU transport GHG: Routes to 2050? Review of potential radical Future transport technologies and concepts. Report VI, The European Commission’s Directorate General Environment, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  26. EEA. (2008). EU27 electricity production by fuel. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.Google Scholar
  27. EEA. (2010). European union emission inventory report 1990–2008 under the INECE convention on long range trans boundary air pollution (LRTAP). Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.Google Scholar
  28. EEA. (2012). The contribution of transport to AIR quality Term 2012: Transport indicators tracking progress towards environmental targets in Europe. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  29. EEC. (2005). GAES-Future Engine Technology Environmental Impact. Report No. EEC/SEE/2005/002, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, Bretigny Sur Orge, France.Google Scholar
  30. Ewing, G. O., Sarigöllü, E., & Gordon, O. (1998). Car fuel-type choice under travel demand management and economic incentives. Transportation Research D, 3(6), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Flikkema M., Nieuwenhuis, J. J., Duursema, W. (2012). MIP Project “EEDI, Ontwikkeling van alternatieve CO2 index voor kleine handelsvaart schepen en short sea schepen: Current State of Regulations and Literature Survey. Report 1, MARIN Conoship, Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  32. Funk, K., & Rabl, A. (1999). Electric versus conventional vehicles: Social costs and benefits in France. Transportation Research D, 4, 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Georgakellos, D. A. (2008). A polygon-based environmental appraisal of new vehicle technologies combined with renewable energy sources. Transportation Research D, 13(4), 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. GL. (2012). In focus: Containerships: Boosting performance with efficient solutions. Germanischer Lloyd, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  35. Greene, D. L., & Hopson, J. L. (2003). Running out of and into oil: Analyzing global depletion and transition through 2050 ORNL/TM-2003/259. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guynn, M. D., Olson, E. D. (2002). Evaluation of an aircraft concept with over-wing hydrogen-fuelled engines for reduced noise and emissions. Technical Memorandum, NASA/TM = 2002-211926, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Centre, Hampton, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
  37. Haller, M., Welch, E., Lin, J., & Fulla, S. (2008). Economic costs and environmental impacts of alternative fuel vehicle fleets in local government: An interim assessment of a voluntary ten-year fleet conversion plan. Transportation Research D, 12(3), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hamilton, W. (1980). Energy use of electric vehicles. Transportation Research A, 14A, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heffner, R. R., Kurani, K. S., & Turrentine, T. S. (2007). Symbolism in California’s early market for hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research D, 2(6), 396–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Higgins, C. J. H., Matthews, S., Hendrickson, C. T., & Small, M. J. (2007). Lead demand of future vehicle technologies. Transportation Research D, 12(2), 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hörmandinger, G., & Lucas, N. J. D. (1996). Is clean enough? The influence of environmental externalities on markets for fuel cells in transport. Transportation Research D, 1(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ICAO. (2008). ICAO environmental report 2007. Montreal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.Google Scholar
  43. ICG. (2010). Electric car markets in Europe: 10 countries analysis and strategic review. Edinburgh: International Consultancy Group Ltd.Google Scholar
  44. IEA. (2006). Hydrogen production and storage: Research & development priorities and gaps. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  45. IEA. (2009). Hybrid & Electric Vehicles: Implementing Agreement. IA-HEV Outlook 2009, International Energy Agency, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  46. IMO. (2007). FSA (Formal Safety Assessment)—Container vessels: Details on the formal safety assessment, MSC83/INF 8. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
  47. IMO. (2011). Main Events in IMO’s Work on Limitation and Reduction of Green house Gas Emissions from International Shipping. International Maritime Organization, London, UK.Google Scholar
  48. IPCC. (1999). Aviation and the global atmosphere, intergovernmental panel of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. IPCC. (2001). Climate change 2001: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and II and III to the Third Assessment Report of IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  50. IPTS. (2003). Dynamics of introducing of new passenger car technologies: The IPTS transport technologies model. Seville: Institute for Progressive Technological Studies, p. 76.Google Scholar
  51. IPTS. (2008). Environmental Improvement of Passenger Cars (IMPRO-car). Seville: Institute for Progressive Technological Studies.Google Scholar
  52. Janic, M. (2008). The potential of liquid hydrogen for the future ‘Carbon Neutral’ air transport system. Transportation Research D, 13(7), 428–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Janic, M. (2010). Is liquid hydrogen a solution for mitigating air pollution by airports? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(5), 2190–2202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Johansson, B. (1999). The economy of alternative fuels when including the cost of air pollution. Transportation Research D, 4(2), 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Johansson, B., & Åhman, M. (2002). A comparison of technologies for carbon-neutral passenger transport. Transportation Research D, 7(3), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kang, J. E., Recker, W. W. (2009). An activity-based assessment of the potential impacts of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on energy and emissions using 1-day travel data. Transportation Research D, 14(8), 541–556.Google Scholar
  57. Kempton, W., & Letendre, S. E. (1997). Electric vehicles as a new power source for electric utilities. Transportation Research D, 2(3), 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Koyanagi, F., & Uriu, J. (1997). Modeling power consumption of electric vehicles and its impacts on power demand. Electrical Engineering in Japan, 120(4), 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kurani, K. S., Turrentine, T. S., & Sperling, D. (1996). Testing electric vehicle demand in ‘HYBRID Households’ using a reflexive survey. Transportation Research Part D, 1(2), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lave, L. B., & MacLean, H. L. (2002). An environmental-economic evaluation of hybrid electric vehicles: Toyota’s Prius vs. its conventional internal combustion engine corolla. Transportation Research D, 7(2), 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Learmount, D. (2007). New-technology aircraft to reduce average fuel consumption. Retrieved from http://www.flightglobal.com
  62. Lee, J. J., Lukachko, S., Waitz, I. A. (2004). Aircraft and energy use. Encyclopedia of Energy (Vol. 1, pp. 1–11). Philadelphia: Elsevier Science Publisher.Google Scholar
  63. LR. (2011). Assessment of IMO mandated energy efficiency measures for international shipping: Estimated CO 2 emissions reduction from introduction of mandatory Technical and operational energy efficiency measures for ships. MEPC 63/INF.2 Annex, Lloyd’s Register, London, UK.Google Scholar
  64. Mabit, L. S., & Fosgerau, M. (2011). Demand for alternative-fuel vehicles when registration taxes are high. Transportation Research D, 16, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Diesel, M. A. N. (2011). Propulsion trends in container vessels. Copenhagen: MAN Diesel-Powering the World.Google Scholar
  66. Marquart, S., Ponater, M., Strom, L., & Gierens, K. (2005). An upgraded estimate of the relative forcing of cyroplane contrails. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, Gebruder Bontraeger, 14, 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. MEPC. (2012). 2012 Guidelines on the Method of Calculation of the Attained Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for New Ships (Vol. 212, no. 63). [Annex 8, Resolution MEPC]. London, UK: The Marine Environment Protection Committee.Google Scholar
  68. Line, Maersk. (2011). Sustainability progress report 2011-Route 2. Copenhagen: Maersk Line.Google Scholar
  69. Nakata, T. (2000). Analysis of the impact of hybrid vehicles on energy systems in Japan. Transportation Research D, 5(5), 373–383.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  70. Nottebon, T., Rodrigue J. P. (2007). The next fifty years of containerization: container vessels, linear shipping, and port terminal. In Proceedings of the 52 nd Annual Meeting of Association of American Geographers, San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
  71. Notteboom, T. & Carriou, P. (2009). Fuel surcharge practices of container shipping lines: is it about cost recovery or revenue making?. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Conference, June 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  72. NYK Line/MTI. (2010). NYK Super Eco Ship 2030 – Our Concept Ship in the Future. Presentation, Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  73. Ogden, M. J. (1997). Infrastructure for hydrogen cell vehicles: A Southern California case study. ’97 World car conference, Riverside, California, USA.Google Scholar
  74. OI. (2011). The vision scenario for the European union: 2011 update for the EU-27. Oko-Institute, Institute for Applied Ecology, Berlin, Germany. Google Scholar
  75. OSSL. (2009). Green ship of the future: 8500 TEU container ship concept study. Odense: Odense Steel Ship Yard Ltd.Google Scholar
  76. Penner, J. E. (1999). Aviation and the global atmosphere (p. 257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Pfeiffer, A. D. (2004). The end of oil age. Raleigh: Lulu.com.Google Scholar
  78. Rienstra, S. A., & Nijkamp, P. (1998). The role of electric cars in Amsterdam’s transport system in the year 2015: A scenario approach. Transportation Research D, 3(1), 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rudolf, C. D, I. I. I. (2007). Ship-to-shore productivity: Can it keep up with mega-ship size increases? Part 1. Port Technology International, 34(3), 1–5.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  80. Sala, S. (2010). Energy efficiency and the shipping industry. DELTAMARIN, www.deltamarin.com
  81. Schock, R. N., Berry, C. D., Smith, R., Rambach, G. D. (1995). Hydrogen as a new transportation fuel. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  82. Schwoon, M. (2007). A tool to optimize the initial distribution of hydrogen filling stations. Transportation Research D, 12(2), 70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Spiegel, R. J. (2004). Platinum and fuel cells. Transportation Research D, 9(5), 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Svensson, E., Hasselrot, A., & Moldanova, J. (2004). Reduced environmental impact by lowered cruise altitude for liquid hydrogen-fuelled aircraft. Aerospace Science and Technology, 8, 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tozer, D. R. (2001). Ultra-Large Container Ships (ULCS). In Proceedings of Lloyd’s Register Technical Association, London, UK.Google Scholar
  86. UNCDAT. (2012). Review of maritime transport 2012, Report of the UNCTAD Secretariat. United Nations conference on trade and development, United Nations, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  87. UniCredit. (2009). Study: Green shipping. HypoVereinsbank, Global shipping division, UniCredit Corporate Banking, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  88. Wang, Q., DeLucchi, M. A. (1991). Impact of electric vehicles on primary energy consumption and petroleum displacement. Working Paper UCTC No. 6, University of California Transport Center, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA.Google Scholar
  89. Wang, G., Ogden, J. M., & Sperling, D. (2008). Comparing air quality impacts of hydrogen and gasoline. Transportation Research D, 13(7), 436–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transport and Planning DepartmentFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations