Advertisement

Advanced Transport Systems: Operations and Economics

  • Milan JanićEmail author
Chapter
  • 2.6k Downloads

Abstract

This chapter describes advanced freight collection/distribution networks, road mega trucks, LIFTs (Long Intermodal Freight Train(s)) as components of the advanced freight/goods system in Europe, and large commercial freight aircraft. Advanced freight collection/distribution networks can be operated by a single or few different (integrated) transport modes moving freight/goods consolidated into loading units such as pallets, containers, swap-bodies, and/or semi-trailers between the doors of particular shippers and receivers. When these networks are operated exclusively by road, standard or mega trucks are exclusively used. The road mega truck is the largest, i.e., the longest and heaviest, commercial freight vehicle proposed to carry fright/good shipments throughout the EU (European Union) countries. As such, it is longer and heavier that its current largest counterpart—the standard truck with a length of 18.75 m and a weight of 40–44 tons. The LIFTs have been launched in Europe aiming at increasing competitiveness of the rail freight to road truck services and consequently influence modal shift. The large commercial freight aircraft have been considered to operate in the global air long-haul freight/cargo transport network

Keywords

External Cost Freight Transport Transport Unit Road Haulage Service Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AEA. (2011). Reduction and testing of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from heavy duty vehiclesLot 1: Strategy, Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK: Final Report to the European Commission, DG Climate Action Ref: DG ENV. 070307/2009/548572/SER/C.Google Scholar
  2. AEAT. (2005). Structure of the costs and charges reviewEnvironmental costs of rail transport, Final Report to the Office of Rail Regulation, London, UK: AEA Technology Rail.Google Scholar
  3. Airbus. (2012). A380 airplane characteristics for airport planning AC, Cedex, France: Airbus Blagnac.Google Scholar
  4. AM. (2011). Block hour operating costs by airplane type for the year 2010: Executive summary. The Airline Monitor, 24(3), 1–49.Google Scholar
  5. ASECAP. (2010). Introduction of longer and heavier vehicles: Impacts on road infrastructure, Brussels, Belgium: Association des Europeennes des Cpncessionaires d’Autoroutes et d’Ouvrages a Peage.Google Scholar
  6. Baungartberm, J. P. (2001). Prices and costs in the railway sector. Lausanne, Switzerland: EPEL—Ecole Politechnique Federale de Lausanne.Google Scholar
  7. Boeing. (2012). World air cargo forecast 2012–2013. Seattle, WA, USA: Boeing Commercial Airplanes.Google Scholar
  8. Boeing. (2012a). 747-8 airplane characteristics for airport planning. Seattle, WA, USA: Boeing Commercial Airplanes.Google Scholar
  9. Cargolux. (2011). Annual Report 2011, Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Cargolux Airlines International S.A., Luxembourg Airport.Google Scholar
  10. CNT. (2006). Transport/Europe, bulletin of the observatory on transport policies and strategies in Europe, Paris, France: Michel Savy, December.Google Scholar
  11. EASA. (2011). Type-certificate data sheet for noise A380, TCDSN EASA, Issue 6. Koln, Germany: European Aviation Safety Agency.Google Scholar
  12. EC. (1996). Council Directive 96/53/EC, Brussels, Belgium: Official Journal of European Communities, No. L235/59.Google Scholar
  13. EC. (1996a). Towards fair and efficient pricing in transport: Policy options for internalizing the external costs of transport in European Union, Supplement 2/96, Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
  14. EC. (1997a). Innovative bundling networks in europe, TERMINET, Deliverable D1, WP1, The Transport RTD Program of the 4th Framework Program, European Commission, (TERMINET Consortium).Google Scholar
  15. EC. (1997b). New Generation Terminals and Terminal-Node Concepts in Europe, TERMINET, Deliverable D2, WP2, The Transport RTD Programme of the 4th Framework Programme, European Commission, (TERMINET Consortium).Google Scholar
  16. EC. (1998a). Building the blocks for preferable layout of innovative networks, Deliverable D4, WP 3, Final Report, The Transport RTD Programme of the 4th Framework Programme, European Commission, (TERMINET Consortium).Google Scholar
  17. EC. (1999). The common transport policy—Sustainable mobility: Perspectives for the future, Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions, Directorate General DG VII.Google Scholar
  18. EC. (2000a). Intermodal quality-IQ project, Brussels, Belgium: European Commissions, Directorate General DG VII, RTD 4th Framework Program.Google Scholar
  19. EC. (2000b). The way to sustainable mobility: Cutting the external cost of transport, Brussels, Belgium: Brochure of the European Commission.Google Scholar
  20. EC. (2001a). Real cost reduction of door-to-door intermodal transport—RECORDIT, Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Directorate General DG VII, RTD 5th Framework Programme.Google Scholar
  21. EC. (2001b). Improvement of pre- and end- haulage—IMPREND, Brussels, Belgium: European Commissions, Directorate General DG VII, RTD 4th Framework Programme.Google Scholar
  22. EC. (2001c). Towards a new generation of networks and terminals for multimodal freight transport—TERMINET, Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Directorate General DG VII, RTD 4th Framework Programme.Google Scholar
  23. EC. (2002). EU intermodal transport: Key Statistical data 1992–1999, Luxembourg: European Commissions, Office for Official Publications of European Communities.Google Scholar
  24. EC. (2005). Energy and fuel consumption from heavy duty vehicles, COST 346, Final Report on the Action, Brussels, Belgium: European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research.Google Scholar
  25. EC. (2006). Long innovative intermodal interoperable freight trains, Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, INTERREG IIIB NWE, C041.Google Scholar
  26. EC. (2007). Customer-driven rail-freight services on a european mega corridor based on advanced business and operating models (CREAM), Integrated Project, Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Directorate General DG VII, 6th EU Framework Programme.Google Scholar
  27. EIRAC. (2007). Strategic intermodal research agenda 2020. Brussels, Belgium: European Intermodal Research Advisory Council.Google Scholar
  28. ERSO. (2007). Traffic safety: Basic figures 2007Heavy goods vehicles and buses, European Road Safety Observatory, Safety Net, Transport, http://ec.europa.eu/transport/wcm/road_safety/erso/index.html
  29. FAA. (1997). Noise level for U.S. certified and foreign aircraft, Washington, USA.: AEE-110Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
  30. Fraunhofer. (2009). Long-term climate impacts of the introduction of mega-trucks: Study for the Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies (CER). Karlsruhe, Germany: The Fraunhofer-Institute for Systems and Innovation Research.Google Scholar
  31. Hay, W. W. (1977). An introduction to transportation engineering. New York, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Hall, R. W. (1987). Direct versus terminal freight routing on a network with concave costs. Transportation Research B, 21(4), 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hall, R. W. (1993). Design for local area freight networks. Transportation Research Part B, 27B(2), 70–95.Google Scholar
  34. Hwang, L. C., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multi attribute decision-making: Methods and applications, lecture series in economics and mathematical systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ICAO. (2009). ICAO carbon emissions calculator version 2. Montreal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.Google Scholar
  36. ICAO. (2012). ICAO engine exhaust emissions data bank: Subsonic engines. Montreal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.Google Scholar
  37. INFRAS. (2000). External cost of transport: Accident, Environmental and Congestion Costs in Western Europe. Zurich, Switzerland: INFRAS Consulting Group for Policy Analysis and Implementation.Google Scholar
  38. Janic, M., Reggiani, A., & Nijkamp, P. (1999). Sustainability of the European freight transport system: Evaluation of the innovative bundling networks. Transportation Planning and Technology, 23(2), 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Janic, M. (2005). Modelling performances of intermodal freight transport networks. Logistics and Sustainable Transport, 1(1), 19–26.Google Scholar
  40. Janic, M. (2007). Modelling the full costs of an intermodal and road freight transport network. Transportation Research D, 12(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Janic, M. (2008). An assessment of the performance of the European long intermodal freight trains (LIFTs). Transportation Research—A, 42(10), 1326–1339.Google Scholar
  42. Janic, M. (2012). Modeling effects of different air traffic control operational procedures, separation rules, and service disciplines on runway landing capacity, Journal of Advanced Transportation, August 24, 2012. doi: 10.1002/atr.1208
  43. Janic, M., Vleugel, J. (2012). Estimating Potential Reductions in Externalities from Rail-Road Substitution in Trans-European Transport Corridors. Transportation Research D, 17(2), 154–160Google Scholar
  44. Larsson, S. (2009). Weight and dimensions of heavy commercial vehicles as established by directive 96/53/EC and the European modular system (EMS). Brussels, Belgium: Workshop on LHVs.Google Scholar
  45. Levison, D., Gillen, D., Kanafani, A., & Mathieu, J. M. (1996). The full cost of intercity transportationA comparison of high-speed rail, air and highway transportation in california, USA: Institute of Transportation, University of California, Berkeley, Research Report, UCB-ITS-RR-96-3.Google Scholar
  46. LHC. (2011). Thinking ahead: 2011 Annual report, Frankfurt, Germany: Lufthansa Cargo AG, Frankfurt Airport.Google Scholar
  47. Manheim, M. L. (1979). Fundamentals of transportation system analysi:Basic Concepts (Vol. 1). Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Morlok, E. K., Sammon, J. P., Spasovic, L. N., & Nozick, L. K. (1995). Improving productivity in intermodal rail-truck transportation. In P. Harker (Ed.), The service productivity and quality challenge (pp. 407–434). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Morrell, S. P. (2011). Moving boxes by air: Economics of air cargo. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  50. Railtrack, (1998). Braking system and performance for freight trains. London, UK: Railtrack PLC.Google Scholar
  51. Ryck De, H. (2008). Turbofan design for the commercial aircraft. Warsaw, Poland: University of Technology, Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering.Google Scholar
  52. SSG. (2012). 747-8 Quick reference pilot guide, Supercritical Simulations Group. http://www.supercritical-simulations.com
  53. Tarski, I. (1987). The time factor in transportation processes, developments in civil engineering 15. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  54. UIC. (2008). Mega trucks versus rail freight. Paris, France: International Union of Railways.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transport and Planning DepartmentFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations