Skip to main content

Exploring Operations of Manufacturing Plant Types in International Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Operations Networks

Abstract

Internationalized operations are widespread for plants from all over the world. Plants can build their own competitive advantages, but can also rely on location based comparative advantages, such as markets, low cost production opportunities or access to skills and knowledge. International business and strategic management literature offers several studies that focus on the internationalization of manufacturing plants and networks, but they rarely explore operations performed by these plants, may they be single plants of a company or plants within an international manufacturing network (IMN). Operations management literature, on the other hand, has recently started to discover this field. This paper follows this stream by using an international database to analyze plant operations in an international context. Based on the internationalization level of operations (sourcing, manufacturing, sales) we first identify plant types. We provide a deeper insight into the role of these plants by exploring the comparative (country level) and competitive (business unit level) advantages they realize. Lastly, variables of internal (manufacturing) and external (supply chain) operations are also included in our analysis to discover the characteristics of plant operations and to identify differences between various plant types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abele E, Meyer T, Naher U, Strube G, Sykes R (eds) (2008) Global production—a handbook for strategy and implementation. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1989) Managing across borders: a transnational solution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y (2011) Strategic role of manufacturing: from reactive to proactive and from plant to network, PhD Dissertation, Center for Industrial Production, Aalborg University

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Farooq S, Johansen J (2011) Manufacturing network evolution: a manufacturing plant perspective. Int J Ope Prod Manag 31(12):1311–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe NM, Dicken P, Hess M (2008) Global production networks: realizing the potential. J Econ Geogr 8:271–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silveira GJC (2005) Market priorities, manufacturing configuration, and business performance: an empirical analysis of the order-winners framework. J Oper Manag 23(6):662–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeter K (2013) Operating internationally—the impact on operational performance improvement. Int J Prod Econ. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.06.008 (in press, corrected proof)

  • Dubois FL, Toyne B, Oliff MD (1993) International manufacturing strategies of U.S. multinationals: a conceptual framework based on a four-industry case study. J Int Bus Stud 24(2):307–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JH (1980) Toward an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical tests. J Int Bus Stud 11(1):9–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strateg Manag J 21:345–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahy J (2002) A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment. Int Bus Rev 11:57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann A, Olhager J, Persson F (2009) Designing and managing manufacturing networks—a survey of Swedish plants. Prod Plan Control 20(2):101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdows K (1997) Making the most of foreign factories. Harv Bus Rev. 73–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat P (2011) World 3.0: global prosperity and how to achieve it. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill T (1993) Manufacturing strategy: the strategic management of the manufacturing function, MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt MA, Tihanyi L, Miller T, Brian C (2006) International diversification: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manage 32:831–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1977) The internationalization process of a firm—a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J Int Bus Stud 8(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liker JK (2004) The toyota way. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra NK, Agarwal J, Ulgado FM (2003) Internationalization and entry modes: a multitheoretical framework and research propositions. J Int Mark 11(4):9–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miltenburg J (2009) Setting manufacturing strategy for a company’s international manufacturing network. Int J Prod Res 47(22):6179–6203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassimbeni G (2003) Local manufacturing systems and global economy: are they compatible? The case of the Italian eyewear district. J Oper Manage 21(2):151–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiner G, Demeter K, Poiger M, Jenei I (2008) The internationalization process in companies located at the borders of emerging and developed countries. Int J Oper Prod Manage 28(10):918–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth K (1992) International configuration and coordination archetypes for medium-sized firms in global industries. J Int Bus Stud 23(3):533–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-I-Martin X, Blanke J, Hanouz MD, Geiger T, Mia I (2010) The global competitiveness index: looking beyond the global economic crisis In: Schwab K (ed) The global competitiveness report 2010–2011, World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab K (ed) (2010) The global competitiveness report 2010–2011. World Economic Forum, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Gregory M (1998) International manufacturing networks—to develop global competitive capabilities. J Oper Manage 16(2–3):195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD (2007) Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Acad Manag Rev 32(1):273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szász L, Demeter K (2011) Supply chain position and servitization efforts of manufacturing companies in Eastern and Western Europe. J Int Bus Econ 11(1):104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkulainen V, Blomqvist M (2011) Plant roles in high cost countries. A survey analysis of manufacturing networks in the Northern Europe. In: 18th international annual EurOMA conference, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Vereecke A, Van Dierdonck R (2002) The strategic role of the plant: testing Ferdows’s model. Int J Oper Prod Manage 22(5):492–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vereecke A, Van Dierdonck R, De Meyer A (2006) A typology of plants in global manufacturing networks. Manage Sci 52(11):1737–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krisztina Demeter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1

 

Production site (PS)

Real globals (RG)

Domestic player (DP)

Importers (IM)

Exporters (EX)

Country competitiveness factor (7-point scale)

HealthPrEd

6.24 (DP)

6.35 (DP)

6.12 (PS, RG, EX)

6.19

6.26 (DP)

HiEd

5.14 (DP)

5.30 (DP)

4.90 (PS, RG, EX, IM)

5.16 (DP)

5.11 (DP)

Techn

4.81 (DP)

5.05 (DP)

4.46 (PS, RG, EX, IM)

4.92 (DP)

4.77 (DP)

MktSize

4.79 (RG, DP, IM, EX)

5.19 (PS, DP)

5.81 (PS, RG, EX, IM)

5.19 (PS, DP)

5.18 (PS, DP)

BusSoph

4.68 (RG)

5.14 (PS, DP)

4.75 (RG)

4.92

4.84

Innov

4.20 (RG)

4.64 (PS)

4.34

4.42

4.42

Perceived location advantage (5-point scale)

Proximity to suppliers

2.21 (DS, EX)

2.72

2.80 (PS)

2.65

2.94 (PS)

Labor costs

2.72

2.75

2.84

2.59

2.52

Material costs

2.29

2.78

2.70

2.51

2.48

Skills & know-how

3.40 (RG)

3.97 (PS, DP, EX)

3.28 (RG)

3.46

3.43 (RG)

Transport & logistics

3.14

3.46

3.37

3.18

3.21

Proximity to customer

2.51 (DP, IM)

2.88

3.12 (PS, EX)

3.41 (PS, EX)

2.33 (DP, IM)

Competitive priorities (5-point scale)

Price

3.78

3.70

3.84

4.16 (EX)

3.64 (IM)

Product quality

4.06

4.32

4.23

4.27

4.28

Conformance

4.10

4.09

4.31

4.05

4.16

Reliable delivery

3.88

4.10

4.18

4.06

3.95

Fast delivery

3.51 (DP, EX)

3.67

4.04 (PS)

3.81

3.95 (PS)

Customer service

3.53 (DP, EX)

3.97

3.94 (PS)

3.81

3.96 (PS)

Wide product range

3.20

3.28

3.37

3.15

3.34

New product introd.

2.79

3.15

3.17

3.14

3.07

Innovativeness

3.22

3.72

3.51

3.62

3.45

Order size flexibility

3.16

3.00

3.47

3.41

3.28

Environment

2.98

3.17

3.28

3.11

3.16

CSR

2.64 (DP)

3.15

3.20 (PS)

2.86

2.97

Operations: production process type (one of a kind, batch, mass—% of total)

One of a kind

28.78

24.12

29.36

17.04

32.10

Batch production

51.12

45.30

45.44

55.26

52.61

Mass production

20.10

30.58

25.21

27.70

15.30

Operations: order policy (Engineered-to-order, manufactured-to-order, assembled-to-order, make-to-stock—% of total)

ETO

13.27

9.79

17.55

11.19

21.47

MTO

46.29

35.86

49.67

43.67

41.87

ATO

25.45

29.54

16.60

18.25

20.43

MTS

15.00

24.81

16.18

26.92

16.23

Supply chain: purchasing (raw materials, parts/components, subassemblies/systems—% of total)

Raw materials

51.37

40.02 (DP)

55.25 (RG)

51.61

53.86

Parts/components

38.27

39.53

31.50

35.90

34.29

Subassemblies/systems

10.36 (RG)

20.45 (PS, DP, EX)

13.25 (RG)

12.49

11.86 (RG)

Supply chain: selling (to subassembly producers, finished product manufacturers, distributors, end users—% of total)

Subassembly producer

14.14

17.42

16.91

14.81

13.62

Finished products m.

38.32

30.83

30.16

32.00

28.17

Distributors

25.83

27.14

20.96

31.26

32.97

End users

21.71

24.61

31.97

21.93

25.24

Supply chain: improvement programs (implementation effort in the last 3 years, 5-point scale)

Supply strategy

2.91

3.25

2.99

2.94

2.97

Supplier development

2.95

3.46 (EX)

3.10

3.06

2.88 (RG)

Coord. with suppliers

2.65 (RG)

3.34 (PS, EX)

2.90

2.85

2.76 (RG)

Distribution strategy

2.22

2.66

2.58

2.66

2.29

Coord. with customers

2.51

2.85

2.84

2.94

2.62

Environmental impact

2.27

2.69

2.67

2.56

2.37

Risk management

2.58 (RG)

3.15 (PS, EX)

2.83

2.89

2.57 (RG)

  1. Bold—highest value in row, Italic—lowest value in row, (PS, RG, DP, IM, EX) —significant difference (p < 0.05) between the category in the column, and the ones in parentheses (ANOVA, Scheffe post hoc test)

Appendix 2: Questionnaire Items

2.1 Domestic Sourcing, Manufacturing and Selling Ratios

G1. Where do you source the raw materials, parts/components, subassemblies/systems and manufacture and sell the finished products/services resulting from your plant’s dominant activity (answers should add up to 100 %):

 

Sourcing

Manufacturing1

Sales

This country

_______ %

_______ %

_______ %

Within your continent

_______ %

_______ %

_______ %

Outside your continent

_______ %

_______ %

_______ %

Total

100 %

100 %

100 %

  1. 1In case there are other plants in your company involved in your plant’s dominant activity

2.2 Location Advantages

B7. What is the importance of the following advantages provided by the location of the plant?

 

None

 

High

Proximity to suppliers

1

2

3

4

5

Availability of low cost labor

1

2

3

4

5

Availability of low cost material and/or energy sources

1

2

3

4

5

Availability of skills and know-how

1

2

3

4

5

Access to transportation & logistic facilities

1

2

3

4

5

Proximity to customers

1

2

3

4

5

2.3 Competitive Priorities

A4. Consider the importance of the following attributes to win orders from your major customers

 

Importance in the last 3 years

 

Not important

Very important

Lower selling prices

1

2

3

4

5

Superior product design and quality

1

2

3

4

5

Superior conformance to customer specifications

1

2

3

4

5

More dependable deliveries

1

2

3

4

5

Faster deliveries

1

2

3

4

5

Superior customer service (after-sales and/or technical support)

1

2

3

4

5

Wider product range

1

2

3

4

5

Offer new products more frequently

1

2

3

4

5

Offer products that are more innovative

1

2

3

4

5

Greater order size flexibility

1

2

3

4

5

Environmentally sound products and processes

1

2

3

4

5

Committed social responsibility

1

2

3

4

5

2.4 Operations—Production Process Type and Order Policy

B8. To what extent do you use the following process types (% of volume)? (percentages should add up to 100 %):

One of a kind production

Batch production

Mass production

Total

__________ %

__________ %

__________ %

100 %

B9. What proportion of your customer orders are (percentages should add up to 100 %):

Designed/engineered to order

Manufactured to order

Assembled to order

Produced to stock

Total

__________ %

__________ %

__________ %

__________ %

100 %

2.5 Supply Chain—Purchasing and Selling

SC1. What is the percentage of spending on the following categories of goods purchased (your answers should add up to 100 %)?

Raw materials

Parts/components

Subassemblies/systems

Total

_________ %

_________ %

_________ %

100 %

SC4. Indicate the percentage of sales in the following categories of customers (your answers should add up to 100 %):

Manufacturers of subassemblies

Manufacturers of finished products

Wholesalers/distributors

End users

Total

_________ %

_________ %

_________ %

_________ %

100 %

2.6 Supply Chain—Improvement Programs

SC9. Indicate the effort put into implementing the following action programs in the last 3 years

 

Effort in the last 3 years

None

High

Rethinking and restructuring supply strategy and the organization and management of supplier portfolio through e.g. tiered networks, bundled outsourcing, and supply base reduction

1

2

3

4

5

Implementing supplier development and vendor rating programs

1

2

3

4

5

Increasing the level of coordination of planning decisions and flow of goods with suppliers including dedicated investments (e.g. information systems, dedicated capacity/tools/equipment, dedicated workforce)

1

2

3

4

5

Rethinking and restructuring distribution strategy in order to change the level of intermediation (e.g. using direct selling, demand aggregators, multi-echelon chains)

1

2

3

4

5

Increasing the level of coordination of planning decisions and flow of goods with customers including dedicated investments (e.g. information systems, dedicated capacity/tools/equipment, dedicated workforce)

1

2

3

4

5

Improving the environmental impact generated by transportation of materials/products and outsourcing of process steps

1

2

3

4

5

Implementing supply chain risk management practices including early warning system, effective contingency programs for possible supply chain disruptions

1

2

3

4

5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Demeter, K., Szász, L. (2014). Exploring Operations of Manufacturing Plant Types in International Context. In: Johansen, J., Farooq, S., Cheng, Y. (eds) International Operations Networks. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5646-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5646-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5645-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5646-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics